Synthesis of silver nanoparticles by Lactobaciluus acidophilus 01 strain and evaluation of its in vitro genomic DNA toxicity
- 329 Downloads
- 10 Citations
Abstract
Silver nanoparticles synthesized by dried biomass of Lactobaciluus acidophilus 01 strain was evaluated against toxicity of genomic DNA isolated from bacteria (E. coli) fungi (Beauveria bassiana) algae (Seenedesmus acutus) and human blood adopting standard condition was discussed in the present study. Synthesized silver nanoparticles were characterized by UV-Vis spectroscopy and SEM. The UV-Vis spectroscopy revealed the formation of silver nanoparticles by yielding the typical silver plasmon absorption maxima at 430 nm and SEM micrograph indicates the uniform spherical particles within the size range of 45∼60 nm. The energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) of the nanoparticle confirmed the presence of elemental silver signal as strong peak. The above synthesized silver nanoparticles didn’t cause any toxic effect on all the tested genomic DNA at all tested concentrations which reveals nil genomic nanoparticles induced toxicity.
References
- 1.Ahmad, P. Mukharjee, S. Senapati, D Mandal and M. Sastry, Colloids Surf. B 28, 313 (2008). doi:10.1016/S0927-7765(02)00174-1.Google Scholar
- 2.D. Cui and H. Gao, Biotechnol. Prog. 19, 683 (2003). doi:10.1021/bp025791i.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.L. Dubas, T. Kulsiriwiwat and K. Samningjam. Acta. Metallurgica Slovaca 13, 1559 (2007).Google Scholar
- 4.OC. Farokhzad, J. Cheng, B. A. Teply, Sherifi, S. Jon, P. W. Kantoff, JP Richie and R. Langer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103, 6315 (2008). doi:10.1073/pnas.0601755103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.R. Feynman, Science 254, 1300 (1991). doi:10.1126/science.254.5036.1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.C, Greulich, Kittler M. Epple, G. Muhr and Köller, Arch. Surg. 394, 49 (2001).Google Scholar
- 7.M. James, NNIN REU Research Accomplishments 146, 147 (2004).Google Scholar
- 8.T. Klaus, R. Joerger, E. Olsson and C. G. Granqvist, Trends Biotechnol. 19, 15 (2001). doi:10.1016/S0167-7799(00)01514-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.M. Kumar and R. M. Sastry, Nano Lett. 1, 151 (2001).Google Scholar
- 10.M. Kowshik, A. Ahmad, D. Mandal and S. Senapati, Nanotechnology 14, 95 (2003). doi:10.1088/0957-4484/14/ 1/321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.P. D. Marcato, G. I. H. DeSiyza, O. L. Alves, E. Esposito and N. Duran, 4th Mercosur Congress on Process Systems Engineering (2008).Google Scholar
- 12.G. Maribel Guzman, Jean Dille and Stephan Gode, World Academy of Science, Eng. Technol. 43, 17 (2008).Google Scholar
- 13.P. Mehrbod, N. Motamed, M. Tabatabaian, R. Soleimani Estyar and M. T. Kheri, DARU. 17,121 (2009).Google Scholar
- 14.S. Minaeian, A. R. Shahverdi, A. S. Nohi and H. R. Shahverdi, J. Sci. I. A. U. 17, 31 (2009).Google Scholar
- 15.K. Roy, H. Q. Mao, S. K. Huang and K. W. Leong, Nat. Med. 5, 387 (1999). doi:10.1038/7385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.M. V. Rutberg, V. A. Dubina, E. V. Kolikov, E. V. Moiseenko, N. M. Ignateva, Volkov, V. N. Snetov and A. Yu. Stogov, Biochem. Biophys. 421, 193 (2008).Google Scholar
- 17.E. Sachlos, D. Gotora and J. T. Czernuszka, Tissue Eng. 12, 2479 (2006). doi:10.1089/ten.2006.12.2479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.I. H. Sadowski Maliszewska, B. Grochowalska, J. Polowczyk and T. Kozlecki, Mater. Science-Poland 26, 213 (2008).Google Scholar