Nano-Micro Letters

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 160–163 | Cite as

Synthesis of silver nanoparticles by Lactobaciluus acidophilus 01 strain and evaluation of its in vitro genomic DNA toxicity

  • S. Karthick Raja Namasivayam
  • Gnanendra E. Kumar 
  • Reepika R. 
Open Access
Article

Abstract

Silver nanoparticles synthesized by dried biomass of Lactobaciluus acidophilus 01 strain was evaluated against toxicity of genomic DNA isolated from bacteria (E. coli) fungi (Beauveria bassiana) algae (Seenedesmus acutus) and human blood adopting standard condition was discussed in the present study. Synthesized silver nanoparticles were characterized by UV-Vis spectroscopy and SEM. The UV-Vis spectroscopy revealed the formation of silver nanoparticles by yielding the typical silver plasmon absorption maxima at 430 nm and SEM micrograph indicates the uniform spherical particles within the size range of 45∼60 nm. The energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) of the nanoparticle confirmed the presence of elemental silver signal as strong peak. The above synthesized silver nanoparticles didn’t cause any toxic effect on all the tested genomic DNA at all tested concentrations which reveals nil genomic nanoparticles induced toxicity.

Lactobacillus acidophilus Silver nanoparticles Antibacterial activity Biosynthesis 

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmad, P. Mukharjee, S. Senapati, D Mandal and M. Sastry, Colloids Surf. B 28, 313 (2008). doi:10.1016/S0927-7765(02)00174-1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Cui and H. Gao, Biotechnol. Prog. 19, 683 (2003). doi:10.1021/bp025791i.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Dubas, T. Kulsiriwiwat and K. Samningjam. Acta. Metallurgica Slovaca 13, 1559 (2007).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    OC. Farokhzad, J. Cheng, B. A. Teply, Sherifi, S. Jon, P. W. Kantoff, JP Richie and R. Langer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103, 6315 (2008). doi:10.1073/pnas.0601755103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Feynman, Science 254, 1300 (1991). doi:10.1126/science.254.5036.1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C, Greulich, Kittler M. Epple, G. Muhr and Köller, Arch. Surg. 394, 49 (2001).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. James, NNIN REU Research Accomplishments 146, 147 (2004).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Klaus, R. Joerger, E. Olsson and C. G. Granqvist, Trends Biotechnol. 19, 15 (2001). doi:10.1016/S0167-7799(00)01514-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Kumar and R. M. Sastry, Nano Lett. 1, 151 (2001).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Kowshik, A. Ahmad, D. Mandal and S. Senapati, Nanotechnology 14, 95 (2003). doi:10.1088/0957-4484/14/ 1/321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. D. Marcato, G. I. H. DeSiyza, O. L. Alves, E. Esposito and N. Duran, 4th Mercosur Congress on Process Systems Engineering (2008).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Maribel Guzman, Jean Dille and Stephan Gode, World Academy of Science, Eng. Technol. 43, 17 (2008).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Mehrbod, N. Motamed, M. Tabatabaian, R. Soleimani Estyar and M. T. Kheri, DARU. 17,121 (2009).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Minaeian, A. R. Shahverdi, A. S. Nohi and H. R. Shahverdi, J. Sci. I. A. U. 17, 31 (2009).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. Roy, H. Q. Mao, S. K. Huang and K. W. Leong, Nat. Med. 5, 387 (1999). doi:10.1038/7385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. V. Rutberg, V. A. Dubina, E. V. Kolikov, E. V. Moiseenko, N. M. Ignateva, Volkov, V. N. Snetov and A. Yu. Stogov, Biochem. Biophys. 421, 193 (2008).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. Sachlos, D. Gotora and J. T. Czernuszka, Tissue Eng. 12, 2479 (2006). doi:10.1089/ten.2006.12.2479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    I. H. Sadowski Maliszewska, B. Grochowalska, J. Polowczyk and T. Kozlecki, Mater. Science-Poland 26, 213 (2008).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU) Press 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Karthick Raja Namasivayam
    • 1
  • Gnanendra E. Kumar 
    • 1
  • Reepika R. 
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologySathyabama UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations