Advertisement

Monash Bioethics Review

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp S58–S62 | Cite as

Improving Australia’s ethical review processes — slow and steady wins the race

  • Kerry J. Breen
Articles

Abstract

In this response, the Australian Health Ethics Committee (AHEC) indicates that it shares, and has strategies in place to address, the majority of the concerns identified by Susan Dodds. AHEC believes it is too early to assess the full impact of the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans (1999) or to call for a major review of the ethics committee process. While some Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs) are over-stretched, the system is not on the verge of collapse.

Keywords

National Statement Ethical Conduct Human Research Ethic Committee Monash Bioethic Review Human Research Ethic Committee 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Copyright information

© Monash University 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kerry J. Breen
    • 1
  1. 1.Australian Health Ethics CommitteeAustralia

Personalised recommendations