Advertisement

Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 91–98 | Cite as

Gender differences in associations between ADL and other health indicators in 1992 and 2002

  • Pär Schön
  • Marti G. Parker
  • Ingemar Kåreholt
  • Mats Thorslund
Original Article

Abstract

Background and aims: Research has shown increased prevalence rates over time in several health indicators in the older population. These increases have not been accompanied by corresponding increases in ADL and IADL disability. As disability and other health indicators follow different trends, the associations between them may change. And, as both health and disability also appear to follow different trends for men and women, we can expect gender differences in the associations. We examined gender differences in how objective tests of function, as well as self-reported health and function indicators, were associated with ADL/IADL in 1992 and 2002. Methods: Data came from the Swedish Panel Study of Living Conditions among the Oldest Old (SWEOLD), a nationally representative interview survey of persons aged 77+. Results: Compared with men, women had significantly higher prevalence rates for most health indicators in both survey years, but there were no significant gender differences in ADL/IADL limitations. Prevalence rates increased significantly between 1992 and 2002 for all health indicators, but not for ADL/IADL. Most of the associations between ADL/IADL and other health indicators were stronger for men than for women. The overall pattern found was that associations have become weaker for women over time; for men, the picture was mixed. Conclusions: The changing associations between ADL/IADL and other health indicators may reflect complex interplay between changes in several social and environmental factors, some of which may be modifiable. ADL/IADL appear to reflect different dimensions of health and different kinds of needs for men and women.

Keywords

ADL disability elderly population gender differences health IADL 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Costa D. Changing chronic disease rates and long-term declines in functional limitation among older men. Demography 2002; 39: 119–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crimmins EM. Trends in the health of the elderly. Annu Rev Public Health 2004; 25: 79–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crimmins EM, Saito Y. Change in the prevalence of diseases among older Americans: 1984–1994. Demogr Res 2000; 9: 1–20.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Freedman V, Schoeni R, Martin L, Cornman J. Chronic conditions and the decline in late-life disability. Demography 2007; 44: 459–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Freedman VA, Martin LG. Contribution of chronic conditions to aggregate changes in old-age functioning. Am J Public Health 2000; 90: 1755–60.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Freedman VA, Martin LG, Schoeni RF. Recent trends in disability and functioning among older adults in the United States: a systematic review. JAMA 2002; 288: 3137–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kramarow E, Lubitz J, Lentzner H, Y. Trends in the health of older Americans, 1970–2005. Health Affairs 2007; 26: 1417–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martin LG, Freedman VA, Schoeni RF, Andreski PM. Health and functioning among baby boomers approaching 60. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2009; 64: 369–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Robine J, P, Sermet C. Examination of the causes and mechanisms of the increase in disability-free life expectancy. J Aging Health 1998; 10: 171–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wen X. Trends in the prevalence of disability and chronic conditions among the older population: implications for survey design and measurement of disability. Aust J Ageing 2004; 23: 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parker MG, K, Thorslund M. Health changes among Swedish oldest old: prevalence rates from 1992 and 2002 show increasing health problems. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2005; 60: 1351–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schön P, Parker MG. Sex differences in health in 1992 and 2002 among very old Swedes. J Popul Ageing 2008; 1: 107–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ahacic K, Kåreholt I, Thorslund M, Parker MG. Relationships between symptoms, physical capacity and activity limitations in 1992 and 2002. Aging Clin Exp Res 2007; 19: 187–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Merrill SS, Seeman TE, Kasl SV, Berkman LF. Gender differences in the comparison of self-reported disability and performance measures. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1997; 52: M19–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nathanson CA. Sex, illness, and medical care. A review of data, theory, and method. Soc Sci Med 1977; 11: 13–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oksuzyan A, Juel K, Vaupel JW, Christensen K. Men: good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging. Aging Clin Exp Res 2008; 20: 91–102.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Verbrugge LM. The twain meet: empirical explanations of sex differences in health and mortality. J Health Soc Behav 1989; 30: 282–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Verbrugge LM, Wingard DL. Sex differentials in health and mortality. Women Health 1987; 12: 103–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parker MG, Thorslund M, Lundberg O. Physical function and social class among Swedish oldest old. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1994; 49: 196–201.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wray LA, Blaum CS. Explaining the role of sex on disability: a population-based study. Gerontologist 2001; 41: 499–510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leveille SG, Resnick HE, Balfour J. Gender differences in disability: evidence and underlying reasons. Aging Clin Exp Res 2000; 12: 106–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    von Strauss E, Aguero-Torres H, Kareholt I, Winblad B, Fratiglioni L. Women are more disabled in basic activities of daily living than men only in very advanced ages: a study on disability, morbidity, and mortality from the Kungsholmen Project. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 669–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Verbrugge LM. Sex differences in health. In Maddox G, Ed. The Encyclopedia of Aging. New York: Springer, 1987: 601–4.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Manton KG. Mortality and morbidity. In Binstock RH, George LK, Eds. Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences (3rd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press, 1990: 64–90.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Macintyre S, Ford G, Hunt K. Do women ‘over-report’ morbidity? Men’s and women’s responses to structured prompting on a standard question on long standing illness. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 89–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jette AM. Toward a common language for function, disability, and health. Phys Ther 2006; 86: 726–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 1–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Erikson R, Åberg R. Welfare in transition: a survey of living conditions in Sweden 1968–1981. Oxford: Clarendon, 1987.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lundberg O, Thorslund M. Fieldwork and measurement considerations in surveys of the oldest old. Soc Ind Res 1996; 37: 165–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cook NR, Albert MS, Berkman LF, Blazer D, Taylor JO, Hennekens CH. Interrelationships of peak expiratory flow rate with physical and cognitive function in the elderly: MacArthur Foundation studies of aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1995; 50: M317–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cook NR, Evans DA, Scherr PA, Speizer FE, Taylor JO, Hennekens CH. Peak expiratory flow rate and 5-year mortality in an elderly population. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 15: 784–94.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Leveille SG, Fried L, Guralnik JM. Disabling symptoms: what do older women report? J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17: 766–73.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Avlund K, Rantanen T, Schroll M. Tiredness and subsequent disability in older adults: the role of walking limitations. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2006; 61: 1201–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fors S. Health inequalities among older adults in Sweden 1992–2002. Eur J Public Health 2007; 18: 138–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fritzell J, Lundberg O (Eds). Health inequalities and welfare resources. Continuity and change in Sweden. Bristol: The Policy Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thorslund M, Lundberg O. Health and inequalities among the oldest old. J Aging Health 1994; 6: 51–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lundberg O. Den ojämlika ohälsan. Om klass- och könsskillnader i sjuklighet [Inequality in ill health: on class and sex differences in illness]. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1990.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Parker MG, Thorslund M. Health trends in the elderly population: getting better and getting worse. Gerontologist 2007; 47: 150–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Guralnik JM, Branch LG, Cummings SR, Curb JD. Physical performance measures in aging research. J Gerontol Med Sci 1989; 44: M141–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Internal Publishing Switzerland 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pär Schön
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marti G. Parker
    • 2
  • Ingemar Kåreholt
    • 2
  • Mats Thorslund
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Social WorkStockholm University;StockholmSweden
  2. 2.Aging Research CenterKarolinska Institutet and Stockholm University;StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations