Advertisement

Business Research

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 180–204 | Cite as

VHB-JOURQUAL2: Method, Results, and Implications of the German Academic Association for Business Research’s Journal Ranking

  • Ulf SchraderEmail author
  • Thorsten Hennig-Thurau
Open Access
Article

Abstract

VHB-JOURQUAL represents the official journal ranking of the German Academic Association for Business Research. Since its introduction in 2003, the ranking has become the most influential journal evaluation approach in German-speaking countries, impacting several key managerial decisions of German, Austrian, and Swiss business schools. This article reports the methodological approach of the ranking’s second edition. It also presents the main results and additional analyses on the validity of the rating and the underlying decision processes of the respondents. Selected implications for researchers and higher-education institutions are discussed.

Keywords

FRPSDULVRQ ZLWK FRUUHODWLRQ EHWZHHQ 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adler, Nancy J. and Anne-Wil Harzing (2009): When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8 (1): 72–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albers, Sönke (2009): Misleading Rankings of Research in Business, German Economic Review, 10 (3): 352–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azar, Ofer H. and David M. Brock (2008): A Citation-Based Ranking of Strategic Management Journals, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 17 (3): 781–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blank, Rebecca M. (1991): The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from the American Economic Review, American Economic Review, 81 (5): 1041–1067.Google Scholar
  5. Brady, Michael K. and J. Joseph Cronin Jr. (2001): Some New Thoughts on Conceptualizing Perceived Service Quality: A Hierarchical Approach, Journal of Marketing, 65 (3): 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bräuninger, Michael and Justus Haucap (2002): What Economists Think of Their Journals and How They Use Them: Reputation and Relevance of Economics Journals, Discussion Paper, University of the Federal Armed Forces: Hamburg.Google Scholar
  7. Clermont, Marcel (2009): Erfassung betriebswirtschaftlich relevanter Zeitschriften in Literaturdatenbanken: Analyse hinsichtlich Vollständigkeit und Schlussfolgerungen für die Literatursuche und die Messung der Forschungsleistung, Working Paper, RWTH: Aachen.Google Scholar
  8. Clermont, Marcel and Christian Schmitz (2008): Erfassung betriebswirtschaftlich relevanter Zeitschriften in den ISI-Daten-banken sowie der Scopus-Datenbank, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 78 (10): 987–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dilger, Alexander (2000): Plädoyer für einen sozialwissenschaftlichen Zitationsindex, Die Betriebswirtschaft, 60 (4): 473–484.Google Scholar
  10. Dyckhoff, Harald and Christian Schmitz (2007): Forschungsleistungsmessung mittels SSCI oder SCI-X? Internationale Sichtbarkeit und Wahrnehmung der deutschen Betriebswirtschaftslehre von 1990 bis 2004, Die Betriebswirtschaft, 67 (6): 640–664.Google Scholar
  11. Extejt, Marian M. and Jonathan E. Smith (1990): The Behavioral Sciences and Management: An Evaluation of Relevant Journals, Journal of Management, 16 (3): 539–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fabel, Oliver and Frank Heße (1999): Befragungsstudie vs. Publikationsanalyse: Zur Interpretation von Ranglisten der Forschungsaktivitäten deutscher betriebswirtschaftlicher Fachbereiche, Die Betriebswirtschaft, 59 (2): 196–204.Google Scholar
  13. Franke, Nikolaus and Martin Schreier (2008): A Meta-Ranking of Technology and Innovation Management/Entrepreneurship Journals, Die Betriebswirtschaft, 68 (2): 185–216.Google Scholar
  14. Frey, Bruno S. (2007): Evaluierungen, Evaluierungen … Evaluitis, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 8 (3), 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frey, Bruno S. and Katja Rost (2008): Do Rankings Reflect Research Quality?, Working Paper, SSRN.Google Scholar
  16. Harzing, Anne-Wil (ed.) (2007): Journal Quality List, 26th ed., 5 March 2007, www.harzing.com/jql.htm (Access Date: 2007-03-10).Google Scholar
  17. Harzing, Anne-Wil (ed.) (2009): Journal Quality List, 34th ed., 3 July 2009, www.harzing.com/jql.htm (Access Date: 2009-08-28).Google Scholar
  18. Heischmidt, Kenneth A. and Peter Gordon (1993): Rating of Marketing Publications: Impact of Accreditation and Publication History, Journal of Education for Business, 68 (3): 152–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten, Markus F. Langer, and Ursula Hansen (2001): Modeling and Managing Student Loyalty: An Approach Based on Relationship Quality, Journal of Service Research, 3 (4): 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten, Gianfranco Walsh, and Ulf Schrader (2004): VHB-JOURQUAL: Ein Ranking von betriebswirtschaftlich-relevanten Zeitschriften auf der Grundlage von Expertenurteilen, Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 56 (6): 520–545.Google Scholar
  21. Homburg, Christian (2008): Internationalität, Praxisnähe, Spitzenforschung: Deutsche Universitäten im Zielkonflikt?, in: Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg (ed.): Zukunft deutscher Universitäten: Standpunkte und Perspektiven, Gabler: Wiesbaden, 31–6Google Scholar
  22. Hult, G. Tomas M., Martin Reimann, and Oliver Schilke (2009): Worldwide Faculty Perceptions of Marketing Journals: Rankings, Trends, Comparisons, and Segmentations, global EDGE Business Review, 3 (3): 1–10.Google Scholar
  23. Laband, David N. and Michael J. Piette (1994a): The Relative Impacts of Economics Journals: 1970–1990, Journal of Economic Literature, 32 (2): 640–666.Google Scholar
  24. Laband, David N. and Michael J Piette (1994b): Does the “Blindness” of Peer Review Influence Manuscript Selection Efficiency?, Southern Economic Journal, 60 (4): 896–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Macharzina, Klaus, Joachim Wolf, and Anne Rohn (2004): Quantitative Evaluation of German Research Output in Business Administration — 1992–2001, Management International Review, 44 (3): 335–359.Google Scholar
  26. Maier, Gunther (2006): Impact factors and peer judgment: The case of regional science journals, Scientometrics, 69 (3): 651–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oesterle, Michael-Jörg (2006): Wahrnehmung betriebswirtschaftlicher Fachzeitschriften durch Praktiker, Die Betriebswirtschaft, 66 (3): 307–325.Google Scholar
  28. Ritzberger, Klaus (2008): A Ranking of Journals in Economics and Related Fields, German Economic Review, 9 (4): 402–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rossiter, John R. (2002): The C-OAR-SE Procedure for Scale Development in Marketing, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19 (4): 305–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schlinghoff, Axel and Uschi Backes-Gellner (2002): Publikationsindikatoren und die Stabilität wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Zeit-schriftenrankings, Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 54 (6): 343–362.Google Scholar
  31. Schrader, Ulf and Thorsten Hennig-Thurau (2007): VHB-JOURQUAL2: Planungsstand und Ergebnisse der Vorbefragung. Presentation at the 69th annual scientific conference of the VHB, June 2nd, Paderborn.Google Scholar
  32. Schulze, Günther G., Susanne Warning, and Christian Wiermann (2008): Zeitschriftenrankings für die Wirtschaftswissenschaften: Konstruktion eines umfassenden Metaindexes, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 9 (3): 286–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simon, Hermann (1993): Die deutsche Betriebswirtschaftslehre im internationalen Wettebewerb — ein schwarzes Loch?, in: Horst Albach and Klaus Brockhoff (eds.): Die Zukunft der Betriebswirtschaftslehre in Deutschland, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Special Issue 9/1993: 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Starbuck, William H. (2004): Vita Contemplativa: Why I stopped trying to understand the real world, Organization Studies, 25 (7): 1233–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thomson Reuters (2009): Journal Citation Reports, Edition 2008, http://admin-apps.isiknowledge.com/JCR/JCR (with licence, Access Date: 2009-08-28).Google Scholar
  36. Vieira, Pedro Cosme da Costa (2008): An Economics Journals’ Ranking that Takes into Account the Number of Pages and Coauthors, Applied Economics, 40 (7): 853–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Vocational Education and Work Studies, Division of Work Studies: Economy and Sustainable ConsumptionTechnical University of BerlinGermany
  2. 2.Department of Marketing and Media ResearchBauhaus-University of WeimarGermany
  3. 3.Faculty of ManagementCass Business SchoolCity University LondonUK

Personalised recommendations