Medical Science Educator

, Volume 23, Supplement 3, pp 431–435 | Cite as

Development of Interprofessional Graduate Health Professions Education Programs: Findings From a Needs Assessment

  • Emmanuelle Careau
  • Isabelle Savard
  • Holly O. Witteman
Short Communications
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

It is increasingly necessary to equip healthcare professionals to engage in collaboration via interprofessional education (IPE). This paper describes the findings of a mixed-methods pedagogical needs assessment in health professions education, in which IPE emerged as a key theme. Two new graduate programs aim to meet these needs.

Keywords

Interprofessional education needs assessment mixed methods flexible instructional design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, et al. Health professionals for new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependant world. The Lancet 2010.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aretz HT. Some thoughts about creating healthcare professionals that match what societies need. Med Teacher 2011; 33: 608–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gibbs T, McLean M. Creating equal opportunities: the social accountability of medical education. Med Teacher 2011; 33: 620–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gruppen LD, Mangrulkar RS, Kolars JC (2012) The promise of competency-based education in the health professions for improving global health. Human Resources for Health 2012; 10: 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hirsh D, Walters L, Poncelet AN. Better learning, better doctors, better delivery system: possibilities from a case study of longitudinal integrated clerkships. Med Teacher 2012; 34: 548–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Armstrong EG, Barsion SJ. Creating “innovator’s DNA” in health care education. Acad Med 2013; 88: 343–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaprielian VS, Silberberg M, McDonald MA, Koo D, Hull SK, et al. Teaching population health: a competency map approach to education. Acad Med 2013; 88: 626–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage Publications; 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reeves S, Perrier L, Goldman J, Freeth D, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (update). The Cochrane Library 2013; 2013(3):1–47.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zwarenstein M, Reeves S, Perrier L. Effectiveness of pre-licensure interprofessional education and post-licensure collaborative interventions. J Interprof Care 2005; 19 Suppl 1:148–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Olenick M, Allen LR. Faculty intent to engage in interprofessional education. J Multidiscip Healthc 2013; 6:149–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Accreditation of Interprofessional Health Education Initiative (AIPHE). Interprofessional Health Education Accreditation Standards Guide. Canada: AIPHE, 2011.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Egan-Lee E, Baker L, Tobin S, Hollenberg E, Dematteo D, Reeves S. Neophyte facilitator experiences of interprofessional education: implications for faculty development. J Interprof Care 2011; 25(5):333–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Steinert Y. Learning together to teach together: interprofessional education and faculty development. J Interprof Care 2005; 19(Suppl 1):60–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Freeth D, Hammick M, Koppel I, Reeves S, Barr H. A critical review of evaluation of interprofessional education. London: Higher Education Academy Learning and Teaching Support Network for Health Sciences and Practice, 2002.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    World Health Organization. Framework for Action on Interprofessional Education & Collaborative Practice. Geneva, Switzerland: 2010.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oandasan I, Reeves S. Key elements for interprofessional education, part 1: the learner, the educator and the learning context. J Interprof Care 2005; 19(suppl 1):8–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emmanuelle Careau
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Isabelle Savard
    • 1
  • Holly O. Witteman
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of MedicineUniversité LavalQuébec CityCanada
  2. 2.Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS)Québec CityCanada
  3. 3.Réseau de Collaboration sur les Pratiques Interprofessionnelles en Santé et Services Sociaux (RCPI)Québec CityCanada
  4. 4.Research Centre of the CHU de QuébecQuébec CityCanada

Personalised recommendations