Advertisement

Medical Science Educator

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 158–168 | Cite as

Does Critical Reflection by Biochemistry Learning Teams Foster Patient-centered Beliefs among Medical Students?

  • Lon J. Van WinkleEmail author
  • Nalini Chandar
  • Jacalyn M. Green
  • Sean M. Lynch
  • Susan M. Viselli
  • Paulette Burdick
Original Research

Abstract

The authors measured patient-centered orientation scores of first-year osteopathic medical students before vs. after implementing exercises to foster critical reflection by learning teams. In the 2008–09 academic year, 60 of a total of 130 classroom hours were devoted to team-based learning (TBL) in a sequence of three Biochemistry courses (1500, 1501 and 1502). TBL was modified to include required and extra-credit team critical reflection assignments. Index questions were used to compare student learning on their own using modified TBL to learning facilitated by instructors in the preceding year. Individual student performances on index questions improved using modified TBL as the sequence of three courses progressed from 8% lower than in the prior year for the first course (p<0.001) to 7% higher than in the prior year for the third course (p<0.005). Moreover, team members cooperated more on team tests as they progressed from Biochemistry 1500 through Biochemistry 1502 (p<0.01). Finally, students became more patient-centered and caring (p<0.0001) using modified TBL, whereas the reverse was observed (p<0.01) prior to implementing exercises to foster critical reflection by team-based learning teams. Thus, TBL, modified to include opportunities for team critical reflection, fostered both cooperation and patient-centered orientations in first-year medical students.

Keywords

Empathy patient-centered professionalism reflection team-based 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ogur B, Hirsh D, Krupat E, Bor D. The Harvard medical school — Cambridge integrated clerkship: an innovative model of clinical education. Acad Med. 2007; 82: 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krupat E, Pelletier S, Alexander EK, Hirsh D, Ogur B, Schwartzstein R. Can changes in the principal clinical year prevent the erosion of students’ patient-centered beliefs? Acad Med. 2009; 84: 582–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hojat M. Ten approaches for enhancing empathy in health and human services culture. J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2009; 31: 412–450.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Colliver JA, Conlee MJ, Verhulst SJ, Dorsey JK. Reports of the decline of empathy during medical education are greatly exaggerated: a reexamination of the research. Acad Med. 2010; 85: 588–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hojat M, Vergare MJ, Maxwell K, Brainard G, Herrine SK, Isenberg GA, et al. The devil is in the third year: a longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school. Acad Med. 2009; 84: 1182–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Newton BW, Barber L, Clardy J, Cleveland E, O’Sullivan P. Is there hardening of the heart in medical school? Acad Med. 2008; 83: 244–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mehrabian A. Beyond IQ: broad-based measurement of individual success potential or “emotional intelligence”. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs. 2000; 126: 133–239.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hojat, M. Empathy in patient care: antecedents, development, measurement, and outcomes. New York: Springer; 2007.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohen, JJ. Viewpoint: linking professionalism to humanism: what it means, why it matters. Acad Med. 2007; 82: 1029–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Winkle LJ, Robson C, Chandar N, Green JM, Viselli SM, Donovan K. Use of poems written by physicians to elicit critical reflection by students in a medical biochemistry course. Journal for Learning Through the Arts. [in press].Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mann K, Gordon J, MacLeod A. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2009; 14: 595–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Winkle LJ, Dobie S, Ross VR, Sharma U, Green JM, Lynch SM. Acute intervention to foster reflection on reciprocity in relationships increased participants’ patient- or student-centered orientation scores in association with a medical biochemistry course. Internet J Med Ed. 2011; 1(2).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Michaelsen LK, Knight AB, Fink LD. Team-Based Learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups in College Teaching. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing; 2004.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morrison G, Goldfarb S, Lanken PN. Team training of medical students in the 21st century: would Flexner approve? Acad Med. 2010; 85: 254–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van Winkle LJ, Sefcik D. Medical students’ attitudes toward using simulated patients to introduce basic science concepts in a large classroom setting. Internet J Med Ed. 2010; 1(2).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sefcik D, Van Winkle LJ. Motivating students to attend basic science lectures. Acad Med. 2011; 86: 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Plack MM, Driscoll M, Blissett S, McKenna R, Plack TP. A method for assessing reflective journal writing. J Allied Health. 2005; 34: 199–208.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Plack MM, Driscoll M, Marquez M, Cuppernull L, Maring J, Greenberg L. Assessing reflective writing on a pediatric clerkship by using a modified Bloom’s Taxonomy. Ambul Pediatr. 2007; 7: 285–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krupat E, Rosenkranz SL, Yeager, CM, Barnard K, Putnam SM, Inui TS. The practice orientations of physicians and patients: The effect of doctor-patient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2000; 39: 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wiener H, Plass H, and Marz R. Team-based learning in intensive course format for first-year medical students. Croat Med. J 2009; 50: 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vasan NS, DeFouw DO, and Holland BK. Modified use of team-based learning for effective delivery of medical gross anatomy and embryology. Anat Sci Educ. 2008; 1: 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nieder GL, Parmelee DX, Stolfi A, and Hudes PD. Team-based learning in a medical gross anatomy and embryology course. Clin Anat. 2005; 18: 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chung EK, Rhee JA, Baik YH, and A OS. The effect of team-based learning in medical ethics education. Med Teach. 2009; 31: 1013–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vasan NS, DeFouw DO, and Compton S. A survey of student perceptions of team-based learning in anatomy curriculum: favorable views unrelated to grades. Anat Sci Educ. 2009; 2: 150–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Parmelee DX, DeStephen D, and Borges NJ. Medical students’ attitudes about team-based learning in a pre-clinical curriculum. Med Educ Online. 2009; 14: 1.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Power DV, Durning S, Moutier C, Massie FS, Harper W, Eacker A, Szydlo DW, Sloan JA, and Shanafelt TD. Burnout and serious thoughts of dropping out of medical school: a multi-institutional study. Acad Med. 2010; 85: 94–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lon J. Van Winkle
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nalini Chandar
    • 1
  • Jacalyn M. Green
    • 1
  • Sean M. Lynch
    • 1
  • Susan M. Viselli
    • 1
  • Paulette Burdick
    • 1
  1. 1.Chicago College of Osteopathic MedicineMidwestern UniversityDowners GroveUSA

Personalised recommendations