Assessing Professionalism and Ethics Knowledge and Skills: Preferences of Psychiatry Residents
- 124 Downloads
Professionalism is one of the fundamental expectations and a core competency in residency education. Although programs use a variety of evaluative methods, little is known about residents’ views of and preferences regarding various methods of assessment.
The authors surveyed residents at seven psychiatry residency programs in the United States regarding their attitudes on professionalism, ethics preparation, and evaluation in psychiatry residency training. This report describes their views on methods of assessing professionalism.
Residents strongly agreed that clinical supervision is an appropriate assessment method. Moreover, they rated clinical supervision more highly than oral examinations, short-answer questions, essays, and standardized patient interactions. Residents also strongly favored direct faculty observation of residents’ interactions with actual patients and clinical team members.
This study suggests that both direct faculty supervision and other clinically-based assessments are methods accepted by psychiatry residents. Future research on the validity and effectiveness of these modes of assessment is needed.
KeywordsAcademic Psychiatry Standardize Patient Psychiatry Resident Ethic Training Clinical Supervision
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 17.ABIM Foundation: American Board of Internal Medicine; ACP-ASIM Foundation. American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine; European Federation of Internal Medicine: Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136:243–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Branch WT Jr: Small-group teaching emphasizing reflection can positively influence medical students’ values. Acad Med 2001; 76:1171-1172; author reply: 1172–1173Google Scholar