Severity of bulimic symptoms is the best predictor of interference on an emotional Stroop paradigm

Original Research Paper

Abstract

Objective: The goal of the current study was to further investigate whether an emotional Stroop effect exists among patients with bulimia nervosa. Method: Performances of 30 female controls, 30 females with subclinical eating disordered symptoms, and 30 females diagnosed with bulimia nervosa were compared on an emotional Stroop color naming task using stimuli separated into three areas of concern (eating, weight, and shape words). Results: Results indicated that overall the three groups differed significantly on the emotional Stroop task, with the interference latency for disorder salient words progressively increasing as the severity of bulimic symptoms increased. Severity of bulimic symptoms was the best predictor of interference on the emotional Stroop paradigm. Discussion: Results provide further evidence that interference on the emotional Stroop is uniquely related to the symptoms of bulimia nervosa and bear credence to the possibility of its use as an additional tool in the diagnosis of bulimia nervosa.

Key words

Bulimia eating disorders Stroop interference emotional 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stroop J.R.: Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Exp. Psychol., 18, 643–662, 1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ben-Tovim D.I., Walker M.K., Fok D., Yap E.: An adaptation of the Stroop test for measuring shape and food concerns in eating disorders: A quantitative measure of psychopathology? Int. J. Eat. Disord., 8, 681–687, 1989.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cooper M.J., Anastasiades P., Fairburn C.G.: Selective processing of eating-, shape-, and weight-related words in persons with bulimia nervosa. J. Abnorm. Psychol., 101, 352–355, 1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cooper M.J., Fairburn C.G.: Selective processing of eating, weight and shape related words in patients with eating disorders and dieters. Br. J. Clin. Psychol., 31, 363–365, 1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cooper M.J., Todd G.: Selective processing of three types of stimuli in eating disorders. Br. J. Clin. Psychol., 36, 279–281, 1997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Perpina C., Hemsley D., Treasure J., de Silva P.: Is the selective information processing of food and body words specific to patients with eating disorders? Int. J. Eat. Disord., 14, 359–366, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    MacLeod C.M.: Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychol. Bull., 109, 163–203, 1991.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beumont P.J.V.: Clinical presentation of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. In: Fairburn C.G., Brownell K.B. (Eds.), Eating disorders and obesity, 2nd ed. New York, The Guilford Press, 2002, pp. 162–170.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dobson K.S., Dozois J.A.: Attentional biases in eating disorders: A meta-analytic review of Stroop performance. Clin. Psychol. Rev., 28, 1001–1022, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cooper M.J., Fairburn C.G.: Demographic and clinical correlates of selective information processing in patients with bulimia nervosa. Int. J. Eat. Disord., 13, 109–116, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fairburn C.G., Cooper Z.: The Eating Disorder Examination. In: Fairburn C.G., Wilson G.T. (Eds.), Binge eating: Nature, assessment and treatment, 12th ed. New York, The Guilford Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thelen M.H., Farmer J., Wonderlich S., Smith M.: A revision of the Bulimia Test: The BULIT-R. Psychol. Assess., 3, 119–124, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Herman C.P., Polivy J.: Restrained eating. In: Stunkard A.J. (Ed.), Obesity. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders Company, 1980, pp. 208–225.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. Washington, American Psychiatric Association, 2004.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith M.C., Thelen M.H.: Development and validation of a test for bulimia. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 52, 863–872, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thelen M.H., Mintz L.B., Vander Wal J.S.: The Bulimia Test-Revised: Validation with DSM-IV criteria for bulimia nervosa. Psychol. Assess., 8, 219–221, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Beck A.T., Steer R.A., Brown G.K.: Beck Depression Inventory-II Manual. The Psychological Corporation. Harcourt Brace Javanovick, Inc., 1996Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wechsler D.: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition Manual. New York, The Psychological Corporation, 1997.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cohen J.: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Editrice Kurtis 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristine L. Lokken
    • 1
  • H. M. Marx
    • 2
  • F. R. Ferraro
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryThe University of Alabama at Birmingham CPM253BirminghamUSA
  2. 2.Georgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of North DakotaGrand ForksUSA

Personalised recommendations