For an anthropology of eating disorders. A pornographic vision of the self

New Hypotheses
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

In reading the considerations of the leading contemporary sociologists, attentive observers of the metamorphosis of identity in the post-modern age, a game came to my mind: “what if I mixed up quotes from these scholars’ papers with extracts from patients’ clinical reports, especially people suffering from so-called “eating disorders”? The objective of this game is to show how difficult it is to pick out the clinical fragments from the sociologists’ descriptions of the “never ending task of assembling our Self”. The game is to try to separate psychopathology from the Late Modern physiology of identity. The great psychopathologists from the last century offered us two major meaning organizers of identity and its disorders: the Freudian and the Jaspersian. Freud’s notion of the “discontents with civilization” served to explain that widespread sense of malaise that characterizes the modern condition. As civilization has been built on our restraining our drives, civilized man ended up “trading in a part of his chances for happiness for a bit of security”. Security is guaranteed by our submitting to norms of civilized living together. Neurosis, that feeling that permeates modern human beings who neither belong to themselves nor to others, is the agonizing result. The Jaspersian concept of the Ego consciousness is mainly based on the Kantian Self, the identity pole of subjectivity, standing above the stream of changing experience. It is a necessary condition for coherent experience. Also the Jaspersian Self presupposes coherence, since its main features include identity through time, a sense of unity and one of demarcation from the external world, and a feeling of being actively involved in one’s own experiences and performances. In late modernity, identity is a task. Post-modern people have the task and necessity to be perpetually constructing themselves. Being, Self, are organized in a reflexive way. Individuals are forced to choose their own life style among a multitude of alternatives. Are the Freudian and the Kantian/Jaspersian models of the Self now still proving to be suitable for an adequate psychopathological analysis?

Key words

Eating disorders self phenomenology anthropology identity late modernity 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Bauman Z.: Intervista sull’identità. Roma/Bari, Laterza, 2003.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Giddens A.: Modernity and self-identity. London, Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sennet R.: The corrosion of character. The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York/London, Norton and Co., 1999.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bauman Z.: La società dell’incertezza, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1999.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Milos G., Spindler A., Schnyder U., Mertz J., Hoek H.W., Willi J.: Incidence of severe anorexia nervosa in Switzerland: 40 years of development. Int. J. Eat. Disord., 35, 250–258, 2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoek E.W., van Hoeken D.: Review of the prevalence and incidence of eating disorders. Int. J. Eat. Disord., 34, 383–396, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yannakoulia M., Matalas A.-L., Yiannakouris N., Papoutsakis C., Passos M., Klimis-Zacas D.: Disordered eating attitudes: an emerging health problem among Mediterranean adolescents. Eat. Weight Disord., 9, 126–133, 2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freud S.: 1929. Civilization and its discontents, Standard Edition, vol. XXI, London Hogarth Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jaspers K.: Allgemeine Psychopathologie, Heidelberg, Springer, 1913.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bleuler E.: Dementia praecox oder Gruppe der Schizophrenie. Leipzig, Deuticke, 1911.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Minkowski E.: La schizophrénie. Psychopathologie des schizoides et des schizophrènes, Paris, Payot, 1927.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Henry M.: Incarnation. Pour une philosophie de la chaire, Paris, Seuil, 2000.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Merleau-Ponty M.: The primacy of perception, Northwestern, Evanston, 1964.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sheets-Johnstone M.: The primacy of movement. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins, 1999.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stanghellini G.: Disembodied spirits and deanimated bodies. The psychopathology of common sense. Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tiger L.: The manufacture of evil: Ethics, evolution and the industrial system. New York, Harper & Row, 1987.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paquette M.C., Rine K.: Sociocultural context of women’s body image. Soc. Sci. Med., 59, 1047–1058, 2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kjaerbye-Thygesen A., Munk C., Ottesen B., Kruger Kjaer S.: Why do slim women consider themselves too heavy? A characterization of adult women considering their body weight as too heavy. Int. J. Eat. Disord., 35, 275–285, 2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cena H., Toselli A., Tedeschi S.: Body uneasiness in overweight and obese Italian women seeking weightloss treatment. Eat. Weight Disord., 8, 321–325, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Foucault M.: L’hermeneutique du sujet. Cours au College de France, 1981-1982. Paris, Seuil/Gallimard, 2001.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ricouer P.: Soi-méme comme un autre. Paris, Seuil, 1990.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Arciero G.: Saggi e dialoghi sull’identità personale. Torino, Bollati Boringhieri, 2002.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gergen M., Gergen K.J.: Social construction. A reader. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi, SAGE, 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Editrice Kurtis 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università “G. D’Annunzio”ChietiItaly

Personalised recommendations