The prejudice and discrimination that overweight and obese individuals experience as a result of their weight (i.e. weight stigma) often leads to psychological consequences, such as depression. The present study examined whether coping with stigmatizing experiences mediated the relationship between perceived weight stigma and depression among overweight/obese treatment seeking adults. Fifty-four overweight and obese (mean BMI=37.2) weight loss treatment seeking participants (87.3% Caucasian, 79.6% female) participated in the study. Results from this study indicate that greater stigmatizing experiences were significantly related to depression. Both adaptive and maladaptive coping significantly mediated the relationship between weight stigma and depression. Surprisingly however, greater adaptive coping was positively related to depression. Coping responses appear to mediate the association between experiencing bias and discrimination because of one’s weight and adverse psychological outcomes. Results suggest that obese individuals are at considerable risk for psychological complications secondary to weight-based mistreatment by others and their responses to cope with the mistreatment.
Weight stigma bias obesity depression coping
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Carr D, Friedman MA, Jaffe K. Understanding the relationship between obesity and positive and negative affect: the role of psychosocial mechanisms. Body Image 2007; 4: 165–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers A, Rosen JC. Obesity stigmatization and coping: Relation to mental health symptoms, body image, and self-esteem. Int J Obes 1999; 23: 221–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman KE, Reichmann SK, Costanzo PR, et al. Weight stigmatization and ideological beliefs: Relation to psychological functioning in obese adults. Obes Res 2005; 13: 907–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puhl RM, Brownell KD. Confronting and coping with weight stigma: an investigation of overweight and obese adults. Obesity 2006; 14: 1802–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner E, Edge K, Altman J, et al. Searching for the structure of coping: A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychol Bull 2003; 129: 216–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Association for the Advancement of Fat Acceptance. NAAFA policy on adoption discrimination. http://www.naafa.org/documents/policies/adoption.html, 1991.
Tobin DL, Holroyd KA, Reynolds RV, et al. The hierarchical factor structure of the Coping Strategies Inventory. Cogn Ther Res 1989; 13: 343–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faith MS, Leone M, Ayers TS, et al. Weight criticism during physical activity, coping skills, and reported physical activity in children. Pediatrics 2002; 110: e23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977; 1: 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986; 51: 1173–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel ME. Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In: Leinhart S (Ed) Sociological methodology. San Franscisco, Jossey- Bass, 1982, pp 290–312.Google Scholar