Comparison of extractability of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn with sequential extraction in contaminated and non-contaminated soils

  • M. A. KashemEmail author
  • B. R. Singh
  • T. Kondo
  • S. M. Imamul Huq
  • S. Kawai


Various extraction procedures were employed for measuring extractable concentrations of potential toxic elements in soil. The extractability of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn in four contaminated and four non-contaminated soils of Japan, was compared by single extraction (CaCl2, DTPA, NH4Cl, 0.1 M HCl and 1 M HCl ) and sequential extraction procedures [(six operationally defined chemical phases, viz. water soluble (Fl), exchangeable (F2), carbonate (F3), oxide (F4), organic (F5) and residual (F6) fractions)]. Extractability of metals from soils samples varied depending on metals and/or extradants used. Among the extradants, 1 M HCl extracted the largest proportion of Cd (79 to 96% of total), Cu (61 to 83%), Pb (51 to 99%) and Zn (23 to 52%) from soils followed by 0.1 M HCl, NH4Cl, DTPA and CaCl2. In all the extradants, the proportion of extractability of metals was higher in the contaminated soils than the non-contaminated soils. Regardless of soils and extradants, relative extractability was higher for Cd as compared to other three metals. The use of 1 M HCl may be recommended for first-level screening of soil contamination with heavy metals. The other four weak extradants are believed to provide a better assessment of bioavailable/mobile metals content in soils than 1 M HCl extradant. However, 0.1 M HCl mobilized all four metals irrespective of soil types, therefore, might be the best choice if only one extradant is to be used. The sequential extraction procedures showed 22 to 64% of total Cd was in the mobile fraction (sum of Fl to F3), while the corresponding values for Cu, Pb and Zn in this fractions were 2 to 23% suggesting higher mobility of Cd than other three metals. The single extraction procedures are simple and easy to perform and obtained results are comparable with sequential extraction procedure.


Contaminated soils chemical extraction heavy metals single and sequential extraction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ANNZECC, ARMCANZ., (2000). Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine water Quality. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra. Chapter 3, 1–103.Google Scholar
  2. Ahnstrom, Z.S., Parker, D.R., (1999). Development and assessment of a sequential extraction procedure for the fractionation of soil cadmium. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 63, 1650–1658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asami, T., Kubota, M., Orikasa, K., (1994). Distribution of different fractions of cadmium, zinc, lead and copper in unpolluted and polluted soils. Water Air Soil Plollut, 83, 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beckett, P.H.T., (1989). The use of extractants in studies on trace metals in soils, sewage sludges and sludge-treated soils. Adv. Soil Sci., 9, 143–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bouyoucos, G.J., (1962). Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils. Agron J., 54, 464–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Council on Soil Testing and Plant Analysis (CSTPA), (1980). Handbook on reference methods for soil testing. Unvi. Georgia, Athens, GA.Google Scholar
  7. Evans, L.J., Spiers, G.A., Zhao, G., (1995). Chemical aspects of heavy metals solubility with reference to sewage sludge amended soils. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 59, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gupta, S.K., Aten, C, (1993). Comparison and evalution of extraction media and their suitability in a simple model to predict the biological relevance of heavy metal concentrations in contaminated soil. Int. J. Anal Chemist, 51, 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. He, Q.B., Singh. B.R., (1993). Plant availability of cadmium in soils. I. Extractable cadmium in newly and long-term cultivated soils. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B. Soil Plant Sci., 43, 134–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kashem, M.A., Kondo, T., Singh, B.R., Kawai, S., (2006). Fractionation and mobility of cadmium, copper, lead and zinc in some contaminated soils of Japan. J. Environ. Monitor. Assess. (Submitted).Google Scholar
  11. Kashem, M.A., Singh, B.R., (2001). Solid phase speciation of Cd, Ni and Zn in some contaminated and non-contaminated tropical soils. In: Iskandar IK and Krikham MB (Ed) Trace Elements in Soil. Bioavailability, Flux and Transfe, Lewis publishers, CRS press. Boca Raton. FL. 213–227.Google Scholar
  12. Krishnamurti, G.S.R., Huang, P.M., Van Rees, K.C.J., Kozak, L.M., Rostead, H.P.W., (1995). A new soil test method for determination of plant available cadmium in soils. Commun. Soil Sci.Plant Anal., 26, 2857–2867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lindsay, W.L., Norvell, W.A., (1978). Development of DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sc. Soc. Am. J., 42, 421–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Matos, A.T., Fontes, M.P.F., Costa, L.M., Martinez, M.A., (2001). Mobility of heavy metals as related to soil chemical and mineralogical characteristics of Brazilian soils. Environ. Pollut, 111, 429–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McCready, S., Birch, G.F. and Taylor, S.E., (2003). Extraction of heavy metals in Sydney Harbour sediments using IM HCl and 0.5M EDTA and implications for sediment-quality guidelines. Aust. J. Earth Sci., 50, 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McLaughlin, M.J., Zarcinas, B.A., Stevens, D.P., Cook, N., (2000). Soil Testing for Heavy Metals. Commun. Soil Sci.Plant Anal., 31, 1661–1700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mellum, H.K., Arnesen, A.K.M., Singh, B.R., (1998). Extractability and plant uptake of heavy metals in alum shale soils. Commun. Soil Sci.Plant Anal., 29, 1183–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Minitab Inc., (1992). Statistical software standard version. Pennsylvania State Collage, PA: Minitab Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Narwal, R.P. Singh, B.R., (1998). Effect of organic materials on partitioning, extractability and plant uptake of metals in an alum shale soil. Water Air Soil Pollut., 103, 405–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rieuwerts, J.S., Ashnore, M.R. and Farago, M.E., Thornton, I., (2005). The influence of soil characteristics on the extractability of Cd, Pb and Zn in upland and moorland soils. Sci. Total Environ. Sci. Total Environ., 366, 864–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sims, J.T., Kline, J.S., (1991). Chemical fractionation and plant uptake of heavy metals in soils amended with co-composted sewage sludge. J. Environ. Qual., 20, 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Singh, B.R., Narwal, R.P., Jeng, AS., Almas, A., (1995). Crop uptake and extractability of cadmium in soils naturally high in metals at different pH levels. Commun. Soil Sci.Plant Anal., 26, 2123–2142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Singh, B.R., (2006). Natural attenuation of trace element availability in soils assessed by chemical extraction. In: Rebecca HS, Daryl, McLaughlin MJ (Eds). Natural Attenuation of Trace Element viability in Soils. Taylor & Francis, London, UK. (In press).Google Scholar
  24. Soil Survey Laboratory Staff., (1992). Soil Survey Laboratory methods manual. Soils Surv. Invest. Resps, 42. USDA-SCS, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  25. Udom, B.E., Mbagwu, J.S.C., Adesodun, J.K., Agbim, N.N., (2004). Distribution of zinc, copper, cadmium and lead in a tropical Ultisols after long-term disposal of sewage sludge. Environ. Internat, 30, 467–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Walkley, A., Black, I.A., (1934). An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci., 37, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Xian, X., (1989). Effect of chemical forms of cadmium, zinc, and lead in polluted soils on their uptake by cabbage plants. Plants and Soil., 113, 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Kashem
    • 1
    Email author
  • B. R. Singh
    • 2
  • T. Kondo
    • 3
  • S. M. Imamul Huq
    • 4
  • S. Kawai
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Nutrition, Faculty of AgricultureIwate University Ueda 3-18-8MoriokaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Plant and Environmental SciencesNorwegian University of Life SciencesAasNorway
  3. 3.Geo-Environmental Protection DepartmentFujita CorporationAtsugiJapan
  4. 4.Department of Soil, Water and EnvironmentDhaka UniversityDhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations