The fate and behavior of selected endocrine disrupting chemicals in full scale wastewater and sludge treatment unit processes

Article

Abstract

Endocrine disrupting chemicals are discharged into the environment mainly through wastewater treatment processes. There is a need for better understanding of the fate of these compounds in the unit processes of treatment plant to optimise their removal. The fate of oestrone, 17β-estradiol, 17α-ethinyestradiol and nonylphenol in the unit processes of full scale wastewater treatment plants in the UK, including activated sludge plant, oxidation ditch, biofilter and rotating biological contactor were investigated. The overall removal efficiencies of all the compounds ranged from 41 %to 100%. The removals were predominantly during the secondary biological treatment with the rates of removal related to the nitrification rates and the sludge age. The removal efficiency of the treatment processes were in the order activated sludge > oxidation ditch > biofilter > rotating biological contactors. Activated sludge plant configured for biological nutrient removal showed better removal of the endocrine disrupting chemicals compared to conventional activated sludge plant effluents. Tertiary treatment was also significant in the removal process through solids removal. Overall mechanisms of removal were biodegradation and sorption unto sludge biomass. Phytoremediation was also significant in the removal processes. The endocrine disrupting chemicals persisted in the anaerobic sludge digestion process with percentage removals ranging fro 10–48 %. Sorption of the endocrine disrupting chemicals onto the sludge increased with increasing values for the partitioning coefficients and the organic carbon contents of the sludge.

Keywords

Biodegradation Endocrine disrupting compounds Removal efficiency Sludge Wastewater treatment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. APHA; AWWA; WEF, (1992). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 18th Ed. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and the Water Environment Federation. Washington DC., USA.Google Scholar
  2. Baronti, C.; Curini, R.; D’Ascenzo, G.; Di Corcia, A.; Samperi, R., (2000). Monitoring natural and synthetic estrogens at activated sludge treatment plants and in receiving river water. Environ. Sci. Tech., 34(24), 5059–5066 (8 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birkett, J. W.; Lester, J. N., (2003). Endocrine Disrupters in Wastewater and Sludge Treatment Processes. CRC Press LLC, Florida.Google Scholar
  4. Chien, M. K.; Shih, L. H., (2007). An empirical study of the implementation of green supply chain management practices in the electrical and electronic industry and their relation to organizational performances. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 4(3), 383–394 (12 pages).Google Scholar
  5. Czajka, C. P.; Londry, K. L., (2006). Anaerobic biotransformation of estrogens. Sci. Total Environ., 367(2–3), 932–941 (10 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. D’Ascenzo, G.; Di Corcia, A.; Gentili, A.; Mancini, R.; Mastropasqua, R.; Nazzari, M.; Samperi, R., (2003). Fate of natural estrogen conjugates in municipal sewage transport and treatment facilities. Sci. Total Environ., 302(1–3), 199–209 (11 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Gioia, D.; Sciubba, L.; Bertin, L.; Barberio, C.; Salvadori, L.; Frassinetti S.; Fava, F., (2009). Nonylphenol polyethoxylate degradation in aqueous waste by the use of batch and continuous biofilm bioreactors. Water Res., 43(12), 2977–2988 (12 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Esperanza, M.; Suidan, M. T.; Marfil-Vega, R.; Gonzalez, C.; Sorial, G. A.; McCauley P.; Brenner, R., (2007). Fate of sex hormones in two pilot-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants: Conventional treatment. Chemosphere, 66(8), 1535–1544 (10 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fouial-Djebbar, D.; Badjah Hadji Ahmed, A. Y.; Budzinski, H., (2010). Determination of organochlorine compounds in coastal marine sediments from the southern west of the Mediterranean Sea. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 7(2), 271–280 (10 pages).Google Scholar
  10. Gabet-Giraud, V.; Miege, C.; Choubert, J. M.; Martin Ruel, S.; Coquery, M., (2010). Occurrence and removal of estrogens and beta blockers by various processes in wastewater treatment plants. Sci. Total Environ., 408(19),4257–4269 (13 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gomes, R. L.; Deacon, H. E.; Lai, K. M.; Birkett, J. W.; Scrimshaw, M. D.; Lester, J. N., (2004). An assessment of the bioaccumulation of estrone in Daphnia magna. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 23(1), 105–108 (4 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gomez, M. J.; Martinez Bueno, M. J.; Lacorte, S.; Fernandez-Alba, A. R.; Aguera, A., (2007). Pilot survey monitoring pharmaceuticals and related compounds in a sewage treatment plant located on the Mediterranean coast. Chemosphere, 66(6), 993–1002 (10 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gong, R.; Liang, J.; Chen, J.; Huang, F., (2009). Removal of bisphenol A from aqueous solution by hydrophobic sorption of hemimicelles. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 6(4), 539–544 (6 pages).Google Scholar
  14. Goyal, P.; Sharma, P.; Srivastava, S.; Srivastava, M. M., (2008). Saraca indica leaf powder for decontamination of Pb: Removal, recovery, adsorbent characterization and equilibrium modeling. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 5(1), 27–34 (8 pages).Google Scholar
  15. Haiyan, R.; Shulan, J.; Uddin Ahmad, N.; Dao, W.; Chengwu, C., (2007). Degradation characteristics and metabolic pathway of 17 alpha-ethynylestradiol by Sphingobacterium sp. JCR5. Chemosphere, 66(2), 340–346 (7 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hashimoto, T.; Onda, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Tada, K.; Miya, A.; Murakami, T., (2007). Comparison of natural estrogen removal efficiency in the conventional activated sludge process and the oxidation ditch process. Water Res., 41(10), 2117–2126 (10 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ifelebuegu, A. O.; Theophilus, S. C.; Bateman, M. J., (2010). Mechanistic evaluation of the sorption properties of endocrine disrupting chemicals in sewage sludge biomass. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 7(4), 617–622 (6 pages).Google Scholar
  18. Imai, S.; Shiraishi, A.; Gamo, K.; Watanabe, I.; Okuhata, H.; Miyasaka, H.; Ikeda, K.; Bamba, T.; Kazumasa, H., (2007). Removal of phenolic endocrine disruptors by Portulaca oleracea. J. Biosci. Bioeng., 103(5), 420–426 (7 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Janex-Habibi, M. L.; Huyard, A.; Esperanza, M.; Bruchet, A., (2009). Reduction of endocrine disruptor emissions in the environment: The benefit of wastewater treatment. Water Res., 43(6), 1565–1576 (12 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jobling, S.; Nolan, M.; Tyler, C. R.; Brighty, G. C.; Sumpter, J. P., (1998). Widespread sexual disruption in wild fish. Environ. Sci. Tech., 32(17), 2498–2506 (9 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson, A. C.; Belfroid, A.; Di Corsa, A., (2000). Estimating steroid oestrogen inputs to activated sludge treatment works and observations on their removal from the effluent. Sci. Total Environ., 256(2–3), 163–173 (11 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson. A. C.; Sumpter J. P., (2001). Removal of endocrine disrupting chemicals in activated sludge treatment process. Environ. Sci. Tech., 35(24), 4697–4703 (7 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jurgens, M. D.; Holthaus, K. I. E.; Johnson, A. C.; Smith J. J. L.; Hetheridge, M.; Williams, R., (2002). The potential for estradiol and ethinylestradiol degradation in English Rivers. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 21(3), 480–488 (9 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kanda, R.; Churchley, J., (2008). Removal of endocrine disrupting chemicals during conventional wastewater treatment. Environ. Tech., 29(3), 315–323 (9 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koh, Y. K. K.; Chiu, T. Y.; Boobis A.; Cartmell, E.; Scrimshaw, M. D.; Lester, J. N., (2008). Treatment and removal Strategies of natural Estrogens in the Wastewater. Environ. Tech., 29(1), 245–268 (24 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Korner, W.; Bolz, U.; Sussmuth, W.; Hiller, G.; Schuller, W.; Hanf, V.; Hagenmaier, H., (2000). Input/output balance of estrogenic active compounds in a major municipal sewage plant in Germany. Chemosphere, 40(9–11), 1131–1142 (12 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lai, K. M.; Scrimshaw, M. D.; Lester, J. N., (2002a). Biotransformation and bioconcentration of steroid estrogens by Chlorella vulgaris. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 68(2), 859–864 (6 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lai, K. M.; Scrimshaw, M. D.; Lester, J. N., (2002b). Prediction of the bioaccumulation factors and body burden of natural and synthetic estrogens in aquatic organisms in river systems. Sci. Total Environ., 289(1–3), 159–168 (10 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lillenberg, M.; Yurchenko, S.; Kipper, K.; Herodes, K.; Pihl, V.; Lõhmus, R.; Ivask, M.; Kuu, A.; Kutti, S.; Litvin, S. V.; Nei, L., (2010). Presence of fluoroquinolones and sulfonamides in urban sewage sludge and their degradation as a result of composting. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 7(2), 307–312 (6 pages).Google Scholar
  30. Matsui, S.; Takigami, H.; Matsuda, T.; Taniguchi, N.; Adachi, J.; Kawami, H.; Schimizu, Y., (2000). Estrogens and oestrogen mimics contamination in water and the role of sewage treatment. Water Sci. Tech., 42(12), 173–179 (7 pages).Google Scholar
  31. Miege, C.; Choubert, J. M.; Ribeiro, L.; Eusebe, M.; Coquery, M., (2009). Fate of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in wastewater treatment plants — conception of a database and first results. Environ. Poll., 157(5), 1721–1726 (6 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nakada, N.; Tanishima, T.; Shinokara, H.; Kiri, K.; Takada, H., (2006). Pharmaceutical chemicals and endocrine disrupters in municipal wastewater in Tokyo and their removal during activated sludge treatment. Water Res., 40(17), 3297–3303 (7 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nasu, M.; Oshima, Y.; Tanaka, H., (2001). Study on endocrine disrupting chemicals in wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci. Tech., 43(2), 101–108 (8 pages).Google Scholar
  34. Patrolecco, L.; Capri, S.; De Angelis, S.; Polesello, S.; Valsecchi, S., (2004). Determination of endocrine disrupting chemicals in environmental solid matrices by extraction with a non-ionic surfactant (Tween 80). J. Chromatogr. A., 1022(1–2), 1–7 (7 pages).Google Scholar
  35. Pothitou, P.; Voutsa, D., (2008). Endocrine disrupting compounds in municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants in Northern Greece. Chemosphere, 73(11), 1716–1723 (8 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shi, J. H.; Suzuki, Y.; Nakai, S.; Hosomi, M., (2004). Microbial degradation of estrogens using activated sludge and night soil-composting microorganisms. Water Sci. Tech., 50(8), 153–159 (7 pages).Google Scholar
  37. SCA, (2005). The determination of steroid estrogens in environmental and wastewater using chromatography and mass spectrometery. Standing Committee of Analyst, Environment Agency, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
  38. Stasinakis, A. S.; Kordoutis, C. I.; Tsiouma, V. C.; Gaatidou, G.; Thomaidis, N. S., (2010). Removal of selected endocrine disrupters in activated sludge systems: Effect of sludge retention time on their sorption and biodegradation. Biores. Tech., 101(7), 2090–2095 (6 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stavrakis, C., Hequet, V., Faur, C., Andres, Y., Le-Cloirec, P., Colin, R., (2008). Biodegradation of endocrine disruptors: Case of 17β-Estradiol and Bisphenol A. Environ. Tech., 29(1), 269–278 (10 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ternes, T. A.; Kreckel, P.; Muller, J., (1999a). Behavior and occurrence of estrogens in municipal sewage treatment plants ll. Aerobic batch experiments with activated sludge. Sci. Total Environ., 225(1–2), 91–99 (9 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ternes, T. A.; Stumpf, M.; Mueller, J.; Haberer, K.; Wilken, R. D.; Servos, M., (1999b). Behaviour and occurrence of estrogens in municipal sewage treatment plants -1 investigation in German, Canada and Brazil. Sci. Total Environ., 225(1–2), 81–90 (10 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vader, J. S.; van Ginkel, C. G.; Sperling, F. M. G. M.; de Jong, J.; de Boer, W.; de Graaf, J. S. van der Most, M.; Stokman, P. G. W., (2000). Degradation of ethinyl estradiol by nitrifying activated sludge. Chemosphere, 41(8), 1239–1243 (5 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Litved, H., (2006). Occurrence and removal of selected organic micropollutants at mechanical, chemical and advanced wastewater treatment plants in Norway. Water Res., 40(19), 3559–3570 (12 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wu, J.; He, C., (2010). Experimental and modeling investigation of sewage solids sedimentation based on particle size distribution and fractal dimension. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 7(1), 37–46 (10 pages).Google Scholar
  45. Xu, K.; Harper Jr, W. F.; Zhao, D., (2008). 17α -ethinyestradiol sorption to activated sludge biomass: Thermodynamic properties and reaction mechanism. Water Res., 42(12), 3146–3152 (7 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang, Y.; Zhou, J. L., (2008). Occurrence and removal of endocrine disrupting chemicals in wastewater. Chemosphere, 73(5), 848–853 (6 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhou, H.; Huang, X.; Wang, X.; Zhi, X.; Yang, C.; Wen, X.; Wang, Q.; Tsuno, H.; Tanaka, H., (2010). Behavior of selected endocrine disrupting chemicals in three sewage treatment plants of Beijing, China. Environ. Monit. Assess., 161(1–4), 107–121 (15 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography, Environment and Disaster ManagementCoventry UniversityCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations