Advertisement

Linearized and non-linearized isotherm models comparative study on adsorption of aqueous phenol solution in soil

  • B. SubramanyamEmail author
  • A. Das
Article

Abstract

Use of native soil in adsorption of phenol from industrial wastewater has been one of the attractive option for dephenolation, especially in view of low cost and ease in accessibility, as well as scope for regeneration (or, at least reuse). However, an effective usage of the adsorbent necessitates a deeper understanding of the adsorption characteristics. Most of the study of adsorption characteristics are confined to analysis of mono- and bi- parametric isotherm models (and rarely, linearized multi-parametric isotherm models), due to the difficulties in solving higher parametric models, as well as fairly satisfying results by lower-parametric models. In the present study, adsorption batch studies were carried out using a naturally and widely available common soil of south India (namely, Adhanur soil), for removal of phenol from the aqueous solution, with an explicit objective of comparison of linear and non-linear regression methods for finding variation in isotherm coefficients and fitness of the models. Six linearized isotherm models (including four linearized Langmuir models) and three non-linear isotherm model were discussed in this paper, and their coefficients were estimated. Although all the studied isotherm models showed fairly good fit to the experimental data, but Redlich—Peterson isotherm was found to be the best representative for phenol-sorption on the used soil adsorbent. Besides, it was observed that to determine the isotherm parameters non-linear isotherm models were found to be the best representative of adsorption characteristics, than their linearized counter-parts.

Keywords

Adhanur Soil Dephenolation Multi-parametric coefficients Regression 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdel-Ghani, N. T.; Hefny, M.; El-Chagbaby G. A. F., (2007). Removal of lead from aqueous solution using low cost abundantly available adsorbents. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 4 (1), 67–73 (7 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarry, S. E.; Solomon, B. O., (2008). Kinetics of batch microbial degradation of phenols by indigenous Pseudomonas fluorescence. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 5 (2), 223–232 (10 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akbal, F., (2005). Sorption of phenol and 4-chlorophenol onto pumice treated with cationic surfactant. J. Environ. Manage., 74 (3), 239–244 (6 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aksu, Z.; Yener, J., (2001). A comparative adsorption/ biosorption study of mono-chlorinated phenols onto various sorbents. Waste Manage., 21 (8), 695–702 (8 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al Asheh, S.; Banat, F.; Abu-Aitah, L., (2003). Adsorption of phenol using different types of activated bentonites. Seperat. Purificat. Tech., 33 (1), 1–10 (10 pagres). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Duri, B.; McKay, G., (1988). Basic dye adsorption on carbon using a solid phase diffusion model. Chem. Eng. J., 38 (1), 23–31 (9 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Allen, S. J.; Gana, Q.; Matthewsa, R.; Johnson, P. A., (2003). Comparison of optimised isotherm models for basic dye adsorption by kudzu. Bioresour. Tech., 88 (2) 143–152 (10 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ATSDR, (1998). Toxicological Profile for Phenol. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Atlanta, GA, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Banat, F. A.; Al-Bashir, B.; Al-Asheh, S.; Hayajneh, O., (2000). Adsorption of phenol by bentonite. Environ. Pollut., 107 (3), 391–398 (8 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bandyopadhyay, G.; Chattopadhyay, S., (2007). Single hidden layer artificial neural network models versus multiple linear regression model in forecasting the time series of total ozone. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 4 (1), 141–149 (9 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caturla, F.; Martin-Martinez, J. M.; Molina-Sabio, M.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Torregrosa, R., (1988). Adsorption of substituted phenols on activated carbon. J. Coll. Inter. Sci., 124 (2), 528–534 (7 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dabrowski, A.; Podkoscielny, P.; Hubicki, Z.; Barcza, M., (2005). Adsorption of phenolic compounds by activated carbon -a critical review. Chemosphere, 58 (8), 1049–1070 (22 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dursun, G.; Handan, C.; Arzu, Y. D., (2005). Adsorption of phenol from aqueous solution by using carbonised beet pulp. J. Hazard. Mater. B, 125 (1-3), 175–182 (8 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fang, H. H.; Chen, O., (1997). Toxicity of phenol towards aerobic biogranules. Water Res., 31 (9), 2229–2242 (14 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goncharuk, V. V.; Kucheruk, D. D.; Kochkodan, V. M.; Badekha, V. P., (2002). Removal of organic substances from aqueous solutions by reagent enhanced reverse osmosis. Desalination, 143 (1), 45–51 (7 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gosh, D.; Bhattacharya, G. K., (2002). Adsorption of methylene blue on kaolinite. Appl. Clay Sci., 20 (6), 295–300 (6 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gueu, S.; Yao, B.; Adouby, K.; Ado, G., (2007). Kinetics and thermodynamics study of lead adsorption on to activated carbons from coconut and seed hull of the palm tree. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 4 (1), 11–17 (7 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamdaouia, O.; Naffrechoux, E., (2007), Modeling of adsorption isotherms of phenol and chlorophenols onto granular activated carbon Part I. Two-parameter models and equations allowing determination of thermodynamic parameters. J. Hazard. Mater., 147 (1–2), 381–394 (14 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ho, Y. S.; Wang, C. C., (2004), Pseudo-isotherms for the sorption of cadmium ion onto tree fern. Proc. Biochem., 39 (6), 761–765 (5 pages). Google Scholar
  20. Janos, P.; Buchtova, H.; Ryznarova, M., (2003). Sorption of dyes from aqueous solutions onto fly ash, Water Res., 37 (20), 4938–4944 (7 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kinniburgh, D. G., (1986). General purpose adsorption isotherms. Environ. Sci. Tech., 20 (9), 895–904 (10 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kojima, T.; Nishijima, K.; Matsukata, M., (1995). Removal and recovery of phenol from FCC effluent. J. Membrane Sci., 102 (1–3), 43–47 (5 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kujawski, W.; Warszawski, A.; Ratajczak, W.; Porebski, T.; Capaa, W.; Ostrowska, I., (2004). Removal of phenol from wastewater by different separation techniques. Desalination, 163 (1–3), 287–296 (10 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lanouette, K. H., (1977). Treatment of Phenolic Wastes. Chem Eng., 84 (22), 99–106 (8 pages). Google Scholar
  25. Lawrence, M. A. M.; Kukkadapu, R. K.; Boyd, S. A., (1998). Adsorption of phenol and chlorinated phenols from aqueous solution by tetramethylammonium- and tetramethyl-phosphonium-exchanged montmorillonite. Appl. Clay Sci., 13 (1), 13–20 (8 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Magne, P.; Walker, P. L., (1986). Phenol adsorption on activated carbons: Application to the regeneration of activated carbons polluted with phenol. Carbon, 24 (2), 101–107 (7 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Michot, L. J.; Pinnavaia, T. J., (1991). Adsorption of chlorinated phenols from aqueous solution by surfactant- modified pillared clays. Clay. Miner., 39 (6), 634–641 (8 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moon, H.; Lee, W. K., (1983). Intraparticle diffusion in liquid phase adsorption of phenols with activated carbon in a finite batch adsorber. J. Coll. Interface Sci., 96 (1), 162–170 (9 Pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Murialdo, S. E.; Fenoglio, R.; Haure, P. M.; Gonzalez, J. F., (2003). Degradation of phenol and chlorophenols by mixed and pure cultures. Water SA., 29 (4), 457–463 (7 pages). Google Scholar
  30. Porter, J. F.; Mckay, G.; Choy, K. H., (1999). The prediction of sorption from a binary mixture of acidic dyes using single- and mixed-isotherm variants of the ideal adsorbed solute theory. Chem. Eng. Sci., 54 (24), 5863–5885 (23 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Samarghandi, M. R.; Nouri, J.; Mesdaghinia, A. R.; Mahvi, A. H.; Nasseri, S.; Vaezi, F., (2007). Efficiency removal of phenol, lead and cadmium by means of UV/TiO2/H2O2 processes. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 4 (1), 19–25 (7 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Soil Atlas (1998). Thanjavur district. Department of Agriculture Tamil Nadu, India.Google Scholar
  33. Srivastava, V. C.; Swamy, M. M.; Mall, I. D.; Prasad, B.; Mishra, I. M., (2006). Adsorptive removal of phenol by bagasse fly ash and activated carbon: Equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics. Colloid. Surface. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspect., 272 (1–2), 89–104 (16 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Treybal, R. E., (1981). Mass-transfer Operations. 3rd. Ed., McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  35. Vasanth Kumar, K.; Sivanesan, S., (2005). Comparison of linear and non-linear method in estimating the sorption isotherm parameters for safranin onto activated carbon. J. Hazard. Mater., 123 (1–3), 288–292 (5 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vasanth Kumar, K.; Sivanesan, S., (2007a). Isotherms for Malachite Green onto rubber Wood (Hevea brasiliensis) sawdust: Comparison of linear and non-linear methods. Dyes and Pigments, 72 (1), 124–129 (6 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vasanth Kumar, K.; Sivanesan, S., (2007b). Sorption isotherm for safranin onto rice husk: Comparison of linear and nonlinear methods. Dyes Pigments 72 (1), 130–133 (4 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Viraraghavan, T.; Alfaro, F. M., (1998). Adsorption of phenol from wastewater by peat, fly ash and bentonite. J. Hazard. Mater. 57 (1–3), 59–70 (12 pages). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. WHO, (1963), Guidelines for drinking-water quality, World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringSASTRA UniversityThanjavurIndia

Personalised recommendations