Advertisement

Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 174–181 | Cite as

Reduced midlife physical functioning among never married and childless men: evidence from the 1946 British Birth Cohort Study

  • Jack M. Guralnik
  • Suzanne Butterworth
  • Kushang Patel
  • Gita Mishra
  • Diana Kuh
Section on Longitudinal Studies

Abstract

Background and aims: Marital and parental role characteristics are important factors in both men and women’s health. Most studies to date have either focused on disease specific outcomes or summary measures of self-reported health rather than using functional tests of performance. The goal of this study is to investigate the extent to which marital and parental role characteristics are associated with midlife physical function. Methods: A prospective birth cohort study was carried out with reference to births that took place in England, Scotland, and Wales during one week in March of 1946. Regular assessment of 1353 men and 1411 women were made from six weeks after birth throughout childhood and adulthood. Handgrip strength, timed chair rising, and standing balance tests at age 53 years were used to calculate an aggregate physical performance score that ranged from 0 (poorest score) to 2.81. Results: The mean physical performance score was 1.42 (SD 0.42) for men and 1.30 (SD 0.37) for women. By age 53 years, 11% of men and 8% of women had married but remained childless; 6% of men and 4% of women had never married. Never married (x 1.15; 95% CI 1.06, 1.24) and childless married men ($⋏r x$ 1.36; 95% CI 1.30, 1.42) had significantly poorer physical performance scores than married men with children ($⋏r x$ 1.46; 95% CI 1.43, 1.48). These relationships remained after adjustment for adult social class and employment status, own educational attainment and body mass index at 53 years (beta=−0.18, 95% CI −0.27, −0.09 for never married and beta=−0.09, 95% CI −0.16, −0.03 for childless married, compared with married men with children). Of those men who had never married, 28% reported they were not working due to long-term health problems compared to 5% in both childless married men and married men with children. There were no marked differences in functional outcomes among women. Conclusions: In this representative middle-aged population, unmarried and childless men faced greater risk of poor midlife physical function, even after adjustment for confounders. These findings suggest that for men, marriage and parenthood protect against functional decline in midlife. Alternatively, physical performance may be a marker of poorer health in earlier life, which affects the chance of marriage and parenthood.

Keywords

Aging disability marital status parental status physical function 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. 1.
    Manzoli L, Villlari P, Pirone G, Boccia A. Marital status and mortality in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 2007; 64: 77–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson N, Backlund E, Sorlie P, Loveless C. Marital status and mortality: The national longitudinal mortality study. Ann Epidemiol 2000; 10: 224–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaplan R, Kronick R. Marital status and longevity in the United States population. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60: 760–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ebrahim S, Wannamethee G, McCallum A, Walker M, Shaper A. Marital status, change in marital status, and mortality in middle-aged British men. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 142: 834–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mastekaasa A. Parenthood, gender and sickness absence. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50: 1827–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kotler P, Wingard DL. The effect of occupational, marital and parental roles on mortality: the Alameda County Study. Am J Public Health 1989; 79: 607–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martikainen P. Women’s employment, marriage, motherhood and mortality: a test of the multiple role and role accumulation hypotheses. Soc Sci Med 1995; 40: 199–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Benzeval M. The self-reported health status of lone parents. Soc Sci Med 1998; 46: 1337–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weitoft GR, Haglund B, Hjern A, Rosen M. Mortality, severe morbidity and injury among long-term lone mothers in Sweden. Int J Epidemiol 2002; 31: 573–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weitoft G, Burstrom B, Rosen M. Premature mortality among lone father and childless men. Soc Sci Med 2004; 59: 1449–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bennett K. Does marital status and marital status change predict physical health in older adults? Psychol Med 2006; 36: 1313–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L. Assessing the building blocks of function: Utilizing measures of functional limitation. Am J Prev Med 2003; 25: 112–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wadsworth M, Kuh D, Richards M, Hardy R. Cohort profile: The 1946 National Birth Cohort (MRC National Survey of Health and Development). Int J Epidemiol 2006; 35: 49–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wadsworth ME, Butterworth SL, Hardy RJ et al. The life course prospective design: an example of benefits and problems associated with study longevity. Soc Sci Med 2003; 57: 2193–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuh D, Bassey EJ, Butterworth S, Hardy R, Wadsworth M. Grip strength, postural control, and functional leg power in a representative cohort of British men and women; associations with physical activity, health status, and socioeconomic conditions. J Gerontol Med Sci 2005; 60: 224–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bassey EJ, Harries UJ. Normal values for handgrip strength in 920 men and women aged over 65 years, and longitudinal changes over 4 years in 620 survivors. Clin Sci 1993; 84: 331–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kronhed G, Moller C, Olsson B. The effect of short-term balance training on community-dwelling older adults. J Aging Phys Activity 2001; 9: 19–31.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guralnik JM, Butterworth S, Wadsworth ME, Kuh D. Childhood socioeconomic status predicts physical functioning a half century later. J Gerontol Med Sci 2006; 61: 694–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guralnik JM, Fried LP, Salive ME. Disability as a public health outcome in the aging population. Ann Rev Public Health 1996; 17: 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leveille SG, Penninx BW, Melzer D, Izmirlian G, Guralnik JM. Sex differences in the prevalence of mobility disability in old age: the dynamics of incidence, recovery, and mortality. J Gerontol Soc Sci 2000; 55: 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kiernan K. Who remains celibate? J Biosoc Sci 1988; 20: 253–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McMunn A, Bartley M, Kuh D. Women’s health in mid-life: life course social roles and agency as quality. Soc Sci Med 2006; 63: 1561–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Willits M, Benzeval M, Stansfield S. Partnership history and mental health over time. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004; 58: 53–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Janlert U, Asplund K, Weinehall L, Orth-Gomer K, Unden A. Men who never married. A socio-medical study in northern Sweden. Arctic Med Res 1992; 51: 72–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pudrovska T, Schieman S, Carr D. Strains of singlehood in later life: Do race and gender matter? J Gerontol Soc Sci 2006; 61: 315–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoeffer B. Predictors of life outlook of older single women. Res Nurs Health 1987; 10: 111–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cwikel J, Gramotnev H, Lee C. Never-married childless women in Australia: health and social circumstances in older age. Soc Sci Med 2006; 62: 1991–2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barrett AE, Lynch SM. Caregiving networks of elderly persons: variation by marital status. Gerontologist 1999; 39: 695–704.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Government Actuary’s Department, Marital Status Projections for England and Wales, http://www.gad.gov.uk/marital_status_projections/2003/index_principal.htm, accessed July 13, 2007.
  30. 30.
    Rantanen T, Guralnik JM, Foley D, et al. Midlife hand grip strength as a predictor of old age disability. JAMA 1999; 281: 558–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Salive ME, Wallace RB. Lower extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 556–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Internal Publishing Switzerland 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jack M. Guralnik
    • 1
  • Suzanne Butterworth
    • 2
  • Kushang Patel
    • 1
  • Gita Mishra
    • 2
  • Diana Kuh
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of Epidemiology, Demography and BiometryNational Institute on AgingBethesdaUSA
  2. 2.MRC National Survey of Health and Development, MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and AgeingUniversity College and Royal Free Medical SchoolLondonUK

Personalised recommendations