Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 255–263 | Cite as

Health-related quality of life in older adults with symptomatic hip and knee osteoarthritis: a comparison with matched healthy controls

  • Fausto Salaffi
  • Marina Carotti
  • Andrea Stancati
  • Walter Grassi
Original Articles

Abstract

Background and aims: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessment is receiving increasing attention as an outcome measure in osteoarthritis (OA). The aims of this study were to compare HRQOL among older adults aged 55 to 78 years with hip and/or knee OA with those without OA, and to assess the influence of selected variables (sex, body mass index, radiographic OA severity, educational level, comorbidities) on HRQOL. Methods: The generic Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 item healthstatus questionnaire (SF-36) was administered to a cohort of 264 OA patients (105 with hip OA alone, 108 with knee OA alone, and 51 with both hip and knee OA) and 112 healthy controls. Results: Compared with the healthy controls, OA of the lower extremities has a detrimental effect on the eight-scale profile score, as well as on physical and mental summary measures of the SF-36. The most striking impact was seen in the physical measures “physical functioning”, “physical role” and “pain” (p<0.0001). No statistically significant differences in SF-36 scores were found among the three groups of OA patients. The physical and mental summary scales of the SF-36 were closely correlated (p<0.0001). One hundred and forty-five patients (54.9%) reported at least one chronic coexisting disease. There was a significantinverse association with measures of comorbidity (number of comorbidities and comorbidity index score) and both physical and mental summary scores of the SF-36 questionnaire. In patients with OA of the knee alone (but not in hip OA alone or hip and knee OA), the SF-36 pain score was inversely correlated with years of formal education (p=0.016). In addition, the impact of hip and knee SF-36 dimensions was not influenced by the degree of radiographic severity. Conclusions: Older adults with OA of the lower extremitiesundergo a significant impact on multiple dimensions of HRQOL, compared with healthy controls. The use of a generic measure of HRQOL such as the SF-36, in studies of OA where comorbidity is common, should be useful in characterizing the global burden of this disease.

Keywords

Comorbidity health-related quality of life hip osteoarthritis knee osteoarthritis metrology pain SF-36 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Murray CJL, Lopez AD. The global burden of disease. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davis MA. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Clin Geriatr Med 1988; 4: 241–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mannoni A, Briganti MP, Di Bari M, et al. Epidemiological profile of symptomatic osteoarthritis in older adults: a population based study in Dicomano, Italy. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 576–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Saase JLCM, van Romunde LKJ, Cats A, Vandenbroucke JP, Valkenburg HA. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: Zoetermeer survey. Comparison of radiological osteoarthritis in a Dutch population with that in 10 other populations. Ann Rheum Dis 1989; 48: 271–80.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Picavet HSJ, Hazes JMW. Prevalence of self reported musculoskeletal diseases is high. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 644–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yelin E. The Economics of Osteoarthritis. In Brandt KD, Doherty M, Lohmander LS, eds. Osteoarthritis. New York: Oxford University Press 1998; 23–30.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leardini G, Salaffi F, Montanelli R, Gertzeli S, Colangelo I, Canesi B. A multicentric study of annual costs of knee osteoarthritis in Italy. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44: S313.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oliveria SA, Felson DT, Reed JI, Cirillo PA, Walker AM. Incidence of symptomatic hand, hip, and knee osteoarthritis among patients in a health maintenance organization. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 1134–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Felson DT, Naimark A, Anderson J, Kazis L, Castelli W, Meenan RF. The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly. The Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum 1987; 30: 914–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guccione AA, Felson DT, Anderson JJ, et al. The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health 1994; 84: 351–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kadam UT, Jordan K, Croft PR. Clinical comorbidity in patients with osteoarthritis: a case-control study of general practice consultants in England and Wales. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 408–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ettinger WH, Davis MA, Neuhaus JM, Mallon KP. Long-term physical functioning in persons with knee osteoarthritis from NHANES. I: Effects of comorbid medical conditions. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47: 809–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dominick KL, Ahern FM, Gold CH, Heller DA. Health-related quality of life among older adults with arthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 2: 5 (available at: http://www.hqlo.com/content/2/1/5)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hill CL, Parsons J, Taylor A, Leach G. Health related quality of life in a population sample with arthritis. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 2029–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Center for Disease Control and Prevention: Health-related quality of life among adults with arthritis — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 11 states, 1996–1998. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2000; 49: 366–9.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hagen KB, Kvien TK, Bjorndal A. Musculoskeletal pain and quality of life in patients with noninflammatory joint pain compared to rheumatoid arthritis: a population survey. J Rheumatol 1997: 24: 1703–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Groessl EJ, Kaplan RM, Cronan TA. Quality of well-being in older people with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res 2003; 49: 23–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps (ICIDH): a manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva: WHO, 1980.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Altman R, Brandt T, Hochberg M, Moskowitz R. Design and conduct of clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis. Recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritis Research Society. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1996; 4: 217–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lequesne M. ILAR guidelines for testing slow acting drugs in osteoarthritis (SYSADOAs). Rev Esp Rheumatol 1993; 20 (Suppl 1): 220–1.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bellamy N, Kirwan J, Altman R, et al. Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III clinical trials in knee, hip and hand osteoarthritis. Results of consensus development at OMERACT III. J Rheumatol 1997; 24: 799–802.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science (GREES): osteoarthritis section. Recommendations for the registration of drugs used in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1996; 55: 552–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dougados M, LeClaire P, van der Heijde D, Bloch DA, Bellamy N, Altman RD. A report of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International Standing Committee for Clinical Trials Response Criteria Initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2000; 8: 395–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dominick KL, Ahern FM, Gold CH, Heller DA. Relationship of health-related quality of life to health care utilization and mortality among older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res 2002; 14: 499–508.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of quality of life outcomes. N Engl J Med 1996; 334; 835–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Guyatt GH, Bombardier C, Tugwell PX. Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. CMAJ 1986; 134: 889–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carr A. Problems in measuring or interpreting change in patient outcomes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002; 10: 503–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care 1989; 27: S217–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). 1. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–81.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bellamy N, Watson Buchanan W, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or the knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1833–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bellamy N. Pain assessment in osteoarthritis: experience with the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1989; 18 (Suppl 2): 14–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Salaffi F, Leardini G, Canesi B, Mannoni A, Fioravanti A, Caporali R, on behalf of Gonarthrosis and Quality Of Life Assessment (GOQOLA) Study Group. Reliability and validity of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis index in Italian patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003; 11: 551–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McConnell S, Kolopack P, Davis AM. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): a review of its utility and measurement properties. Arthritis Care Res 2001; 45: 453–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Brazier JE, Harper R, Munro J, Walters SJ, Snaith ML. Generic and condition-specific outcome measures for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology 1999; 38: 870–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Picavet HSJ, Hoeymans N. Health related quality of life in multiple musculoskeletal diseases: SF-36 and EQ-5D in the DMC3 study. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 723–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Steiner W, Stuki G. Responsiveness of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index as compared with the SF-36 in patients with osteoarthritis of the legs undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60: 834–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Talamo J, Frater A, Gallivan S, Young A. Use of the short Form 36 (SF-36) for health status measurement in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1997; 36: 463–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ruta DA, Hurst NP, Kind P, Hunter M, Stubbings A. Measuring health status in British patients with rheumatoid arthritis: reliability, validity and responsiveness of the short form 36-item health survey (SF-36). Br J Rheumatol 1998; 37: 425–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hagen KB, Smedstad LM, Uhlig T, Kvien TK. The responsiveness of health status measures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of disease-specific and generic instruments. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 1474–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Husted JA, Gladman DD, Cook RJ, Farewell VT. Responsiveness of health status instruments to changes in articular status and perceived health in patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 1998; 25: 2146–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Suarez-Almazor ME, Kendall C, Johnson JA, Skeith K, Vincent D. Use of health status measures in patients with low back pain in clinical settings. Comparison of specifc, generic and preference based instruments. Rheumatology 2000; 39: 783–90.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Altman RD, Asch E, Bloch DA, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29: 1039–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification of osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum 1991; 34: 505–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Salaffi F, Carotti M, Stancati A, Grassi W. Radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis: analysis of disease progression. Aging Clin Exp Res 2003; 15: 391–404.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957; 16: 494–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wolfe F. Determinants of WOMAC function, pain and stiffness scores: evidence for the role of low back pain, symptom counts, fatigue and depression in osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia. Rheumatology 1999; 38: 355–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Creamer P, Lethbridge-Cejku M, Hochberg MC. Determinants of pain severity in knee osteoarthritis: effect of demographic and psychosocial variables using 3 pain measures. J Rheumatol 1999; 26:1785–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 1987; 40: 373–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Greenfield S, Apolone G, McNeil BJ, Cleary PD. The importance of co-existent disease in the occurrence of postoperative complications and one-year recovery in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Med Care 1993; 31: 141–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sangha O, Stuki G, Liang M, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The self-administered comorbidity questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Care Res 2003; 49: 156–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Apolone G, Mosconi P. The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 1025–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ware J, Kosinski M, Bayliss M, Rogers WH, Raczec A. Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 Health Profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1995; 4: AS264–79Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    American Geriatric Society Panel on Chronic Pain in Older Persons. The management of chronic pain in older persons. J Am Geriatric Soc 1998; 46: 635–51.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hochberg MC, Kasper J, Williamson J, Skinner A, Fried LP. The contribution of osteoarthritis to disability: preliminary data from the women’s health and aging study. J Rheumatol 1995; 22 (Suppl 43): 16–8.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Davis MA, Ettinger WH, Neuhaus JM, Mallon KP. Knee osteoarthritis and physical functioning: evidence from the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study. J Rheumatol 1991; 18: 591–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Jordan KM, Arden NK, Doherty M, et al. EULAR Recommendations 2003: an evidence based approach to the management of knee osteoarthritis: Report of a Task Force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 1145–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hoeksma HL, van den Ende CHM, Ronday HK, Heering A, Breedveld FC, Dekker J. Comparison of the responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score with generic measures for hip function in osteoarthritis of the hip. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 935–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Birrell F, Croft P, Cooper C, et al. Health impact of pain in the hip region with and without radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis: a study of new attenders to primary care. Ann Rheum Dis 2000; 59: 857–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Salaffi F, Piva S, Barreca C, Cacace E, Ciancio G, Leardini G, on behalf of Gonarthrosis and Quality of Life (GOQUOLA) Study Group. Validation of an Italian version of the arthritis impact measurement scales 2 (ITALIAN-AIMS2) for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology 2000; 39: 720–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ethgen O, Vanparijs P, Delhalle S, Rosant S, Bruyere O, Reginster JY. Social support and health-related quality of life in hip and knee osteoarthritis. Qual Life Res 2004; 13: 321–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hopman-Roch M, Odding E, Hofman A, Hraaimaat F, Bijlsma J. Physical and psychosocial disability in elderly subjects in relation to pain in the hip and/or knee. J Rheumatol 1996; 23: 1037–44.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Stewart AL, Greenfield S, Hays RD, et al. Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcome Study. JAMA 1989; 262: 907–13.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT. The SF-36 health survey questionnaire; an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? BMJ 1993; 306: 1440–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Lyons RA, Lo SV, Littlepage BNC. Comparative health status of patients with 11 common illnesses in Wales. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1994; 48: 388–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Becker N, Bondegaard T, Olsen AK, Sjogren P, Bech P, Eriksen J. Pain epidemiology and health-related quality of life in chronic non-malignant pain patients referred to a Danish multidisciplinary pain center. Pain 1997; 73: 393–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    ICIDH-2 checklist for international classification of functioning disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000. See also:www.ifrr.vdr.de
  67. 67.
    Weigl M, Cieza A, Harder M, et al. Linking osteoarthritis-specific health-status measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003; 11: 519–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Callahan LF, Smith WJ, Pincus T. Self-report questionnaires in five rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Care Res 1989; 2: 122–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Summers MN, Haley WE, Reveille JO, Alarcon GS. Radiographic assessment and psychological variables as predictors of pain and functional impairment in osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. Arthritis Rheum 1988; 31: 204–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    O’Reilly SC, Muir KR, Doherty M. Screening for pain in knee osteoarthritis: which question? Ann Rheum Dis 1996; 55: 931–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Lanyon P, O’Reilly S, Jones A, Doherty M. Radiographic assessment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in the community: definitions and normal joint space. Ann Rheum Dis 1998; 57: 595–601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Verbrugge LM, Cates DM, Ike RW. Risk factors for disability among U.S. adults with arthritis. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Verbrugge LM, Lepkowski JM, Konkol LL. Levels of disability among U.S. adults with arthritis. J Gerontol 1991; 46: S71–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Guralnik JM, LaCroix AZ, Everett DF, Kovar MG. Aging in the eighties: the prevalence of comorbidity and its association with disability. Adv Data Vital Health Stat 1989; no. 170, DHHS Publication No. PHS 89-1250.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Verbrugge LM. Disability transitions for older persons with arthritis. J Aging Health 1992; 4: 212–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Badley EM, Rasooly I, Webster GK. Relative importance of musculoskeletal disorders as a cause of chronic health problems, disability, and health care utilization: findings from the 1990 Ontario Health Survey. J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 505–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Marksabcdef R, Allegrante JP. Comorbid disease profiles of adults with end-stage hip osteoarthritis. Med Sci Monit 2002; 8: 305–9.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Ling S, Bandeen-Roche K, Fan MY, et al. Disability associated with comorbid osteoarthritis (OA) and heart disease (HD). J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48: S35.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Young NL, Cheah D, Waddell JP, et al. Patient characteristics that affect the outcome of total hip arthroplasty: a review. Can J Surg 1998; 41: 188–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Weinberger M, Tierney WM, Booher P. Common problems experienced by adults with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res 1989; 2: 94–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Internal Publishing Switzerland 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fausto Salaffi
    • 1
  • Marina Carotti
    • 2
  • Andrea Stancati
    • 1
  • Walter Grassi
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Patologia Molecolare e Terapie InnovativeCattedra e Scuola di Specializzazione in ReumatologiaItaly
  2. 2.Istituto di Radiologia, Università Politecnica delle MarcheJesiItaly

Personalised recommendations