Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 190–194 | Cite as

Colonic investigations in the elderly: Colonoscopy or barium enema?

  • P. Burtin
  • B. Bour
  • T. Charlois
  • O. Ruget
  • P. Calès
  • A. Dauver
  • J. Boyer
Original Article

Abstract

Colonoscopy (CS) is currently considered the best diagnostic procedure for colonic imaging. The objectives of this multicentric study were to assess whether CS or simple contrast barium enema (SCBE) has the best effectiveness and tolerance in the elderly (over 80 years old). Except in cases of emergency, 67 elderly patients from 3 centers were randomized among three diagnostic strategies: CS, SCBE or barium enema + rectosigmoidoscopy (BERS). CSs were generally carried out after polyethylene- glycol (PEG) cleansing, and barium enemas after enema cleansing.

The diagnostic effectiveness of the three strategies was not significantly different: a colonic abnormality was found in CS, SCBE, BERS groups in 65, 56 and 71% of the cases, respectively. No other investigation was needed in 61 to 76% of cases, and, on the basis of the exploration, final therapy was modified in less than 22% of cases. Overall cleansing quality was significantly better with barium enema (84.1%) than with CS (57.0% p<0.05). This was explained by a poor tolerance to PEG intake, which led to 28.2% of adverse effects, compared with 7.1% after enema preparation (p<0.05). This resulted in a significantly higher failure rate of complete colonic exploration with CS (48%) than with barium enema (9%; p<0.001). In conclusion, the effectiveness of the three diagnostic strategies is similar in the elderly. However, due to a better acceptance of the enema preparation, and to a better success rate of complete exploration, SCBE should be preferred to investigate colonic symptoms when the above preparations are used. (Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 7: 190–194, 1995)

Keywords

Barium enema colonoscopy elderly randomized study 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Williams C.B., Macrae F.A., Bartram C.I.: A prospective study of diagnostic methods in adenoma follow-up. Endoscopy 14: 74–78, 1982.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Howard O.M., Buchanan J.D., Hunt R.H.: Angiodysplasia of the colon. Experience of 26 cases. Lancet 2: 16–19, 1982.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Höchter W., Weingart J., Kühner W., Frimberger E., Ottenjann R.: Angiodysplasia in the colon and rectum. Endoscopic morphology, localisation and frequency. Endoscopy 17: 182–185, 1985.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O’Brien M.J., Winawer S.J., Zauber A.G., Gottlieb L., Sternberg S., Diaz B., Dickersin G., Ewing S., Geller S., Kasimian D., Komorowski R., Saporn A.: The National Polyp Study Group: Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 98: 371–379, 1990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brunetaud J.M., Mosquet L., Houcke M., Scopelliti J., Rance F., Cortot A., Paris J.C.: Villous adenomas of the rectum. Results of endoscopic treatment with Argon and Nd:YAG lasers. Gastroenterology 89: 832–837, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rex D.K., Weddle R.A., Lehman G.A., Pound D., O’Connor K., Hawes R., Dittus R., Lappas J., Lumeng L.: Flexible sigmoidoscopy plus air contrast barium enema versus colonoscopy for suspected lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 98: 855–861, 1990.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parks T.G.: Natural history of diverticular disease of the colon. Clin. Gastroenterol. 4: 53–69, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ministère de la solidarité, de la santé et de la protection: Personnes âgées: environnement, santé, revenus. Cahiers statistiques, Solidarité santé. La documentation française, Paris, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jaramillo E., Slezak P.: Comparison between double-contrast barium enema and colonoscopy to investigate lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointest. Radiol. 17: 81–83, 1992.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Norfleet R.G., Ryan M.E., Wyman J.B., Rhodes R., Nunez J., Kirchner J., Parent K.: Barium enema versus colonoscopy for patients with polyps found during flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 35: 531–534, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ott D.J., Scharling E.S., Chen Y.M., Wu W.C., Gelfand D.W.: Barium enema examination: sensitivity in detecting colonic polyps and carcinomas. Southern Med. J. 82: 197–200, 1989.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Irvine E.J., O’Connor J., Frost R.A., Shorvon P., Somers S., Stevenson G., Hunt R.: Prospective comparison of double contrast barium enema plus flexible sigmoidoscopy us colonoscopy in rectal bleeding: barium enema vs colonoscopy in rectal bleeding. Gut 29: 1188–1193, 1988.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wegener M., Borsch G., Schaffstein J., Luth I., Rickeis R., Ricken D.: Effect of aging on the gastrointestinal transit of a lactulose supplemented mixed solid-liquid meals in human. Digestion 39: 40–46, 1988.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Di Palma J.A., Brady III C.E., Pierson W.P.: Colon cleansing: acceptance by older patients. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 81: 652–655, 1986.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bour B., Blanqui A., Halphen M., Lemann M.: Préparation à la coloscopie du sujet âgé. Résultats obtenus avec 4 litres d’une solution de PEG et impact de l’aromatisation. Med. Chir. Dig. 21: 335–338, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Waye J.D., Bashkoff E.: Total colonoscopy: is it always possible? Gastrointest. Endosc. 37: 152–154, 1991.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grasset D., Roucou C., Syzeirol L., Seigneurie C.: Intérêt et tolerance de la coloscopie chez le sujet de plus de 80 ans. Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol. 16: A110, 1992.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chatrenet P., Friocourt P., Ramain J.P., Cherrier M., Maillard J.B.: Colonoscopy in the elderly: a study of 200 cases. Eur. J. Med. 2:411–413, 1993.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Internal Publishing Switzerland 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Burtin
    • 1
  • B. Bour
    • 2
  • T. Charlois
    • 3
  • O. Ruget
    • 1
  • P. Calès
    • 1
  • A. Dauver
    • 4
  • J. Boyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Gastroenterology UnitUniversity HospitalAngersFrance
  2. 2.Gastroenterology UnitGeneral HospitalLe Mans
  3. 3.Gastroenterology UnitGeneral HospitalLuçon
  4. 4.Department of RadiologyUniversity HospitalAngersFrance

Personalised recommendations