The Teaching of Management of the Pulp in Primary Molars in Europe: A preliminary investigation in Ireland and the UK
- 92 Downloads
- 10 Citations
Abstract
AIM: This was to determine which methods of primary pulp therapy are currently being taught in European dental schools starting with a preliminary study in the UK and Ireland. METHODS: A questionnaire, based on that used in a USA study, was sent to paediatric dentistry staff at each of 18 dental schools in Ireland and the UK. RESULTS: There was a response rate of 87%. All respondents taught the vital pulpotomy technique in primary molars but no uniformity was found regarding pulpectomy, indirect and direct pulp capping techniques. Most respondents, 92.9%, taught the use of ferric sulphate for vital pulpotomy. Formocresol, mineral trioxide aggregate and calcium hydroxide accounted for the remainder, with some respondents electing to teach different medicaments depending on whether the students were at undergraduate or postgraduate level. CONCLUSIONS: Formocresol is no longer the most commonly taught pulp medicament in dental schools in Ireland and the UK.
Key words
Primary pulp therapy pulpotomy ferric sulphate mineral trioxide aggregate formocresolPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Reference Manual guidelines for pulp treatment for primary and young permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 2006;28:144–8Google Scholar
- Al-Zayer MA, Straffon LH, Feigal RJ, Welch KB. Indirect pulp treatment of primary posterior teeth: a retrospective study Pediatr Dent. 2003;25(1):29–36.Google Scholar
- Atieh M. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Int J Paed Dent 2008; 18:325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Duggal MS. Providing children with the quality dental care they deserve. Community Dent Health 2006; 23:66–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duggal MS, Nooh A, High A. Response of the primary pulp to inflammation: a review of the Leeds studies and challenges for the future. Eur J Paed Dent 2002; 3:112–117Google Scholar
- Dunston B, Coll JA. A survey of primary tooth pulp therapy as taught in US dental schools and practiced by diplomats of the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry. Pediatric Dentistry 2008; 30(1) 42–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Falster CA, Arujo FB, Strffon LH, Nor JE. Indirect pulp capping: in vivo outcomes of an adhesive resin system v’s calcium hydroxide for protection of the dentin-pulp complex. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:241–248PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farooq NS, Coll JA, Kuwabara A, Shelton P. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp capping in the treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2000; 22:278–286PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hinds K, Gregory JR. Condition of young children’s teeth. National Diet and Nutrition Survey: children aged 1.5 to 4.5 years. Report of the dental survey. Vol. 2, London: HMSO, 1995:11–20.Google Scholar
- Huth KC, Paschos E, Hajek-Al-Khatar N, et al. Effectiveness of 4 pulpotomy techniques—randomized controlled trial J Dent Res. 2005 Dec;84(12):1144–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Innes NPT, Stirrups DR, Evans DJP, Hall N, Leggate M. A novel technique using preformed metal crowns for managing carious primary molars in general practice — A retrospective analysis Bait Dent J. 2006; 200:451–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- International Agency for Research on Cancer. Press release no. 153. 15 June 2004. URL http://www.iarc.fr/en/Media-Centre/IARC-Press-Releases/Archives-2006-2004/2004/IARC-classifies-formaldehyde-as-carcinogenic-to-humans Accessed 6 December 2007
- Kassa D, Day P, High A, Duggal MS. Histological comparison of pulpal inflammation in primary teeth with occlusal or proximal caries. Int J Paed Dent 2009; 19:26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nadin G, Goel BR, Yeung CA, Glenny AM. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003; 1:CD003220Google Scholar
- Ng FK, Messer LM. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate as a pulpotomy medicament: An evidence-based assessment. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2008 Jun;9(2):58–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pitts NB, Boyles J, Nugent ZJ, Thomas N, Pine CM. The dental caries experience of 5-year-old children in Great Britain (2005/6). Surveys co-coordinated by the British Association for the study of community dentistry. Community Dent Health. 2007 Mar;24(1):59–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Primosch RE, Glomb TA, Jerrell RG. Primary Tooth Pulp Therapy as Taught in Predoctoral Pediatric Dental Programs in the United States. Pediatr Dent 1997; 19:118–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Randall RC. Preformed metal crowns for primary and permanent molar teeth: review of the literature Pediatr Dent. 2002 Sep–Oct;24(5):489–500PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roberts JF, Sherriff M. The fate and survival of amalgam and preformed crown molar restorations placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice. Brit Dent J 1990; 169:237–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rodd HD, Waterhouse PJ, Fuks AB, Fayle SA, Moffat MA. Pulp therapy for primary molars. Int J Paed Dent 2006; 116 (Suppl. 1):15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Srinivasan V, Patchett CL, Waterhouse PJ. Is there life after Buckley’s Formocresol? Part 1 — A narrative review of alternative interventions and materials. Int J Paediatr Dent 2006; 16:117–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Torabinejad M, Chivian N. Clinical applications of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate. J Endod 25:197–205, March 1999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vij R, Coll JA, Shelton P, Farooq NS. Caries control and other variables associated with success of primary molar vital pulp therapy. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26:214–220PubMedGoogle Scholar