Advertisement

A comparison of pain and anxiety associated with the administration of maxillary local analgesia with Wand and conventional technique

  • Jinous F. TahmassebiEmail author
  • M. Nikolaou
  • M. S. Duggal
Article

Abstract

AIM: This was to compare the sensation of pain when injections were given using the Wand computer controlled local analgesia (LA) system and a conventional technique in children of pre-school and school age. METHODS: 38 children were randomly assigned to either a treatment or control group. The treatment (Wand) group consisted of 20 children, while the control group (conventional LA technique) consisted of 18 children. The children were aged between 39.0 and 120.0 months with a mean age of 81.9 months (SD-23.2). One operator carried out all local analgesia administrations. Pain sensation was rated using the VAS scale by the operator, each child and their parent. Anxiety was rated using the Venham scale. RESULTS: No statistical difference in pain sensation and anxiety was found when the Wand was used, compared with the conventional technique (P=0.710, P=0.976). The results also showed no significant difference in anxiety change between males and females in the two groups (P=0.714). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the pain or anxiety experienced by the children in the conventional and Wand group.

Key words

children local analgesia pain anxiety 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen D, Kotil D, Lartzelere R, Huftless S, Beiraghi S. Comparison of a computerized anaesthesia device with a traditional syringe in preschool children. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:315–320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. American Society of Anesthesiologists. New classification of physical status. Anesthesiol 1963;24:111.Google Scholar
  3. Asarch T, Allen K, Petersen B, Beigradi S. Efficacy of a computerized local anaesthesia device in paedi`atric dentistry. Pediatr Dent 1999;2:421–424.Google Scholar
  4. Fenlon WL, Dobbs AR, Curzon MEJ. Parental presence during treatment of the child patient: a study with British patients. Br Dent J 1991;174:23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fernald C, Corry J. Empathic versus directive preparation of children for needles. Child Health Care 1981;10:44–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gibson R, Allen K, Huftless S, Beiraghi S. The Wand vs traditional injections: A comparison of pain related behaviors. Pediatr Dent 2000;21:458–462.Google Scholar
  7. Hochman M, Chiarello D, Hochman C, Lopatkin R, Pergola S. Computerized local anaesthesia vs traditional syringe technique: Subjective pain response. N Y State Dent J 1997;63:24–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Millestone Scientific. The Wand: Computer controlled anaesthesia delivery system. Manual. 1998.Google Scholar
  9. Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, Harkins SW. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain 1994;56:217–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Primosch R, Brooks R. Influence of anaesthetic flow rate delivered by the Wand local anaesthetic system on pain response to palatal injections. Am J Pediatr Dent 2002;15:15–19.Google Scholar
  11. Ram D, Peretz B. Administering local anaesthesia to paediatric dental patientscurrent status and prospects for the future. Int J Paed Dent 2002;12:80–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ram D, Peretz B. The assessment of pain sensation during local anesthesia (Wand) and a conventional syringe. J Dent Child 2003a;70:130–133.Google Scholar
  13. Ram D, Peretz B. Assessing the pain reaction of children receiving periodontal ligament anesthesia using a computerized device (Wand). J Clin Pediatr Dent 2003b; 27:247–50.Google Scholar
  14. Varni JW, Thomson KL, Hanson V. The Varni-Thomson paediatric pain questionnaire: chronic musculoskeletal pain in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Pain 1987;28:27–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Venham L, Gaulin-Kremer E. A self-report measure of situational anxiety for young children. Pediatr Dent 1979;1:91–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Versloot J, Veerkamp JSJ, Hoogstraten J. Pain behavior and distress in children during two sequential dental visits: comparing a computerized anesthesia delivery system and a traditional syringe. Brit Dent J 2008;205:30–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jinous F. Tahmassebi
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Nikolaou
    • 1
  • M. S. Duggal
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept of Paediatric DentistryLeeds Dental InstituteLeedsEngland

Personalised recommendations