Pain control in local analgesia

  • J. G. MeechanEmail author


AIM: This is to review the factors involved in administering local analgesia (LA) to children. REVIEW: This paper describes those aspects that a dentist can control and considers strategies to reduce injection discomfort. The main factors affecting successful use of LA in children are detailed. These include equipment factors, such as needles, syringes and cartridges and patient factors focussing on expectation of pain and anxiety of a child, area of the mouth to be injected, and the appropriate LA technique. In addition safety aspects of using LA in children are discussed. CONCLUSION: A number of factors that are under the influence of the dentist can affect the discomfort of LA. Knowledge of safe LA doses is important to ensure that toxic reactions do not occur.

Key words

pain children dentistry local analgesia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Asarch T, Allen K, Petersen B, Beiraghi S. Efficacy of a computerised local anesthesia device in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent 1999; 21:421–424.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Babikov AS, Moskovets ON, Rabinovich SA. Effect of mepivacaine injection speed on the anesthetic effectiveness and localisation. Int Fed Dent Anesth Soc. Proceedings of the 11th International Dental Congress on Modern Pain Control 2006; p 82.Google Scholar
  3. Bishop PT. The frequency of accidental intravascular injection of local anaesthetics in children. Br Dent J 1983; 154:76–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carr MP, Horton JE. Evaluation of a transoral delivery system for topical anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132:1714–1719.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Corbett IP, Ramacciato JC,Groppo FC, Meechan JG. Topical anaesthetic use amongst UK general dental practitioners. Int Fed Dent Anesth Soc. Proceedings of the 11th International Dental Congress on Modern Pain Control 2006; p 93.Google Scholar
  6. Corbett IP, Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. Articaine infiltration for anesthesia of mandibular first molars. Journal of Endodontics. 2008; 34:514–518.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Don kor P, Wong J, Punnia-Moorthy A. An evaluation of the closed mouth mandibular block technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 19:216–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duncan JD, Reeves GW, Fitchie JG. Technique to diminish discomfort from the palatal injection. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67:901–902PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flanagan T, Wahl MJ, Schmitt MM, Wahl JA. Size doesn’t matter: needle gauge and injection pain. Gen Dent 2007; 55:216–217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Franz-Montan M, Silva ALR., Cogo K, et al. Liposome-encapsulated ropivacaine for topical anesthesia of human oral mucosa. Anesth Analg 2007; 104:1528–1531.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fukuyama H, Suzuki N, Umino M. Comparison of topical anesthesia of 20% benzocaine and 60% lidocaine gel. Oral Surg Oral Med, Oral Path Oral Radiol Endodont 2002; 94:157–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fuller NP, Menke RA, Meyers WJ. Perception of pain to three different intraoral penetrations of needles. J Am Dent Assoc 1979; 99:822–824.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibson RS, Allen K, Hutfless S, Beiraghi S. The Wand vs traditional injection: a comparison of pain related behaviors. Pediatr Dent 2000; 22:458–462.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gill CJ, Orr DL. A double blind crossover comparison of topical anesthetics. J Am Dent Assoc 1979; 98:213–214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hersh V, Houpt MI., Cooper A. Analgesic efficacy and safety of an intra-oral lidocaine patch. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127:1626–1634.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Holst A, Evers H. Experimental studies of new topical anaesthetics on the oral mucosa. Swed Dent J 1985; 9:185–191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hutchins HS, Young FA, Lackland DL, Fishburne CP. The effectiveness of topical anesthesia and vibration in alleviating the pain of oral injections. Anesth Prog 1997; 44:87–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacobs S, Haas DA, Meechan JG, May S. Injection pain: Comparison of the three mandibular block techniques and modulation by nitrous oxide. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134:869–876.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones CM, Heidmann J, Gerrish AC. Children’s ratings of dental injection and treatment pain, and the influence of the time taken to administer the injection. Int J Paeiatr Dent 1995; 5:81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jung IY, Kim JH, Kim ES, Lee CY, Lee SJ. An evaluation of buccal infiltrations and inferior alveolar nerve blocks in pulpal anesthesia for mandibular first molars. J Endodont 2008; 34:11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kanaa MD, Meechan JG, Corbett IP, Whitworth JM. Efficacy and discomfort associated with slow and rapid inferior alveolar nerve block injection. J Endodont 2006; 32:919–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Corbett IP, Meechan JG. Articaine buccal infiltration enhances the effectiveness of lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block. Int J Endodont. 2009;42:238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keller BJ. Comparison of the effectiveness of two topical anesthetics and a placebo in reducing injection pain. Hawaii Dent J 1985; 16:10–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kincheloe JE, Mealiea WL, Mattison GD, Seib K. Psychophysical measurement on pain perception after administration of a topical anesthetic. Quintessence Int 1991; 22:311–315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kohli K, Ngan P, Crout R, Linscott CC. A survey of local and topical anesthesia use by pediatric dentists in the United States. Pediatr Dent 2001; 23:265–259.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kudo M, Ohke H, Katagiri K, et al. The shape of local anesthetic injection syringes with less discomfort and anxiety — evaluation of discomfort and anxiety caused by various types of local anaesthetic injection syringes in high level trait-anxiety people. J Jpn Dent Soc Anesthesiol 2001; 29:173–178.Google Scholar
  27. Kuscu OO, Akyuz S. Children’s preferences concerning the physical appearance of dental injectors. J Dent Child 2006; 73:116–121.Google Scholar
  28. Kuscu OO. Akyuz S. Is it the injection device or the anxiety experienced that causes pain during dental local anaesthesia? Int J Paediat Dent. 2008; 18:139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martin MD, Ramsey DS, Whitney C, Fiset L, Weinstein P. Topical anesthesia: differentiating the pharmacological and psychological contributions to efficacy. Anesth Prog 1994; 41:40–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Meechan JG, Blair GS. Clinical experience in oral surgery with two different automatic aspirating syringes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989; 18:87–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meechan JG, Gowans AJ, Welbury RR. The use of patient controlled transcutaneous electronic nerve stimulation (TENS) to decrease the discomfort of regional anaesthesia in dentistry: a randomised controlled clinical trial. J Dent 1998; 26:417–420.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meechan JG, Thomason JM. A comparison of 2 topical anesthetics on the discomfort of intraligamentary injections. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1999; 87:362–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meechan JG. Supplementary routes to local anaesthesia. Int Endodont J 2002; 35:885–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meechan JG, Day PF. A comparison of intraoral injection discomfort produced by plain and epinephrine-containing lidocaine local anesthetic solutions: a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth, volunteer investigation. Anesth Prog 2002; 49:44–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Meechan JG, Ledvinka J.I.M. Pulpal anaesthesia for mandibular central incisor teeth: a comparison of infiltration and intraligamentary injections. Int Endodont J. 2002; 35:629–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meechan JG, Howlett PC, Smith BD. Factors influencing the discomfort of intraoral needle penetration. Anesth Prog 2005; 52:91–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nakanishi O, Haas D, Ishikawa T, Kameyama S, Nishi M. Efficacy of mandibular topical anesthesia varies with the site of administration. Anesth Prog 1996; 43:14–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Nist RA, Reader A, Beck M, Meyers WJ. An evaluation of the incisive nerve block and combination inferior alveolar and incisive nerve blocks in mandibular anesthesia. J Endodont 1992; 18:455–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nusstein JM, Beck M. Effectiveness of 20% benzocaine as a topical anesthetic for intraoral injections. Anesth Prog 2003; 50:159–163.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Oikarinen VJ, Ylipaavalnpemi P, Evers H. Pain and temperature sensations related to local analgesia. Int J Oral Surg 1975; 4:151–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ram D, Peretz B. Reactions of children to maxillary infiltration and mandibular block injections. Pediat Dent 2001; 23:343–346.Google Scholar
  42. Ram D. Peretz B. The assessment of pain sensation during local anesthesia using a computerized local anesthesia (Wand) and a conventional syringe. J Dent Child 2003; 70:130–133.Google Scholar
  43. Ram D, Hermida LB, Peretz B. A comparison of warmed and room-temperature anesthetic for local anesthesia in children. Pediat Dent 2002; 24:333–336.Google Scholar
  44. Ram D, Hermida B L, Amir E. Reaction of children to dental injection with 27- or 30-gauge needles. Int J Paed Dent 2007; 17:383–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rood JP. Inferior dental nerve block: routine aspiration and a modified technique. Brit Dent J 1972; 132:103–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rood JP. The temperature of local anaesthetic solutions. J Dent 1977; 5:213–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rosivack R G, Koenigsberg S R, Maxwell K C. An analysis of the effectiveness of two topical anaesthetics. Anesth Prog 1990; 37:290–292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Rout PG, Saksena A, Fisher SE. An investigation of the effect on 27-gauge needle tips following a single local anaesthetic injection. Dent Update 2003; 30:370–374.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. San Martin-Lopez AL. Garrigos-Esparza LD. Torre-Delgadillo G. et al. Clinical comparison of pain perception rates between computerized local anesthesia and conventional syringe in pediatric patients. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005; 29:239–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Touyz LZ. Lamontagne P. Smith BE. Pain and anxiety reduction using a manual stimulation distraction device when administering local analgesia orodental injections: a multi-center clinical investigation. J Clin Dent 2004; 15:88–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Versloot J. Veerkamp JS. Hoogstraten J. Computerized anesthesia delivery system vs. traditional syringe: comparing pain and pain-related behavior in children. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005 113:488–493.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Versloot J, Veerkamp JS, Hoogstraten J. Children’s self-reported pain at the dentist. Pain 2007; doi 10.1016/j.pain.2007.09.025.Google Scholar
  53. Versloot J. Veerkamp JS. Hoogstraten J. Pain behaviour and distress in children during two sequential dental visits: comparing a computerised anaesthesia delivery system and a traditional syringe. Brit Dent J. 2008; 205:E2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vickers ER, Punnia Moorthy A. A clinical evaluation of three topical anaesthetic agents. Aust Dent J 1992; 37:266–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. White JJ. Reader A, Beck M et al. The periodontal ligament injection: a comparison of the efficacy in human maxillary and mandibular teeth. J Endodont 1988; 14:508–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Whitworth JM, Kanaa MD, Corbett IP, Meechan JG. Influence of injection speed on the effectiveness of incisive/mental nerve block: a randomised controlled double blind study in adult volunteers. J Endodont 2007; 33:1149–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilson S, Molina L de L, Preisch J, Weaver J. The effect of electronic dental anesthesia on behaviour during local anesthetic injection in the young, sedated dental patient. Padiatr Dent 1999; 21:12–17.Google Scholar
  58. Yagiela JA. Intravascular lidocaine toxicity: influence of epinephrine and route of administration. Anesth Prog 1985; 32:57–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Dental SciencesNewcastle University, Framlington PlaceEngland, UK

Personalised recommendations