The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences

, Volume 58, Issue 4, pp 661–676 | Cite as

Deep Resonant GPS-Dynamics Due to the Geopotential

  • Martin LaraEmail author
  • Juan F. San-Juan
  • Zachary J. Folcik
  • Paul Cefola


On time scales of interest for mission planning of GNSS satellites, the qualitative motion of the semimajor axis and the node evolves primarily from resonances with the Earth’s gravitational field. The relevant dynamics of GPS orbits, which are in deep 2 to 1 resonance, is modeled with an integrable intermediary that depends only on one angle, the stroboscopic mean node, plus a two degrees of freedom perturbation that is factored by the eccentricity. Results are compared with long-term runs of the GTDS DSST showing very good agreement.


Celestial Mechanics Semimajor Axis Transformation Equation Solar Radiation Pressure Artificial Satellite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    ROSSI, A. “Resonant dynamics of Medium Earth Orbits: Space Debris Issues,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 100, No. 4, 2008, pp. 267–286.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    ANSELMO, L. and PARDINI, C., “Long-Term Dynamical Evolution of High Area-to-Mass Ratio Debris Released into High Earth Orbits,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 67, 2010, pp. 204–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    ANSELMO, L. and PARDINI, C. “Dynamical Evolution of High Area-to-Mass Ratio Debris Released into GPS Orbits,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 43, 2009, pp. 1491–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    ELY, T.A. and HOWELL, K.C. “Long Term Evolution of Artificial Satellite Orbits due to Resonant Tesseral Harmonics,” The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences Vol. 44, 1996, pp. 167–190.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    ELY, T.A. and HOWELL, K.C. “Dynamics of Artificial Satellite Orbits with Tesseral Resonances Including the Effects of Luni-Solar Perturbations,” International Journal of Dynamics and Stability of Systems, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1997, pp. 243–269.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    ELY, T.A. and HOWELL, K.C. “East-West Stationkeeping of Satellite Orbits with Resonant Tesseral Harmonics,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2000, pp. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    FERREIRA, L.D.D. and VILHENA DE MORAES, R. “GPS Satellites Orbits: Resonance,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2009, Article ID 347835, 12 pp.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    DELEFLIE, F., LEGENDRE, P., EXERTIER, P. and BARLIER, F. “Long Term Evolution of the Galileo Constellation due to Gravitational Forces,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 36, 2005, pp. 402–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    GARFINKEL, B. “Formal Solution in the Problem of Small Divisors,” Astronomical Journal, Vol. 71, No. 8, 1966, pp. 657–669.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    BROUWER, D. and CLEMENCE, G.M. Methods of Celestial Mechanics, Academic Press, New York and London, 1961, pp. 296ff.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    BOCCALETTI, D. and PUCACCO, G. Theory of Orbits. 2: Perturbative and Geometrical Methods, Springer, A&A library, 1998, p. 10.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    ALLAN, R.R. “Resonance Effects due to the Longitude Dependence of the Gravitational Field of a Rotating Primary,” Planetary and Space Science, Vol. 15, 1967, pp. 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    LANE, M.T. “An Analytical Treatment of Resonance Effects on Satellite Orbits,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 42, Nos. 1–4, 1988, pp. 3–38.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    SOCHILINA, A.S. “On the Motion of a Satellite in Resonance with Its Rotating Plane,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 26, No. 4, 1982, pp. 337–352.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    GEDEON, G.S. “Tesseral Resonance Effects on Satellite Orbits,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1969, pp. 167–189.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    KAMEL, A., EKMAN, D. and TIBBITTS, R. “East-West Stationkeeping Requirements of Nearly Synchronous Satellites due to Earth Triaxiality and Luni-Solar Effects,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1973, pp. 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    ELY, T.A. “Eccentricity Impact on East-West Stationkeeping for Global Positioning System Class Orbits,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2002, pp. 352–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    BOHLIN, K. “Zur Frage der Convergenz der Reihenentwickelungen in der Störungstheorie,” Astronomische Nachrichten, Vol. 121, No. 2, 1889, 17–24.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    FERRAZ-MELLO, S. Canonical Perturbation Theories. Degenerate Systems and Resonance, 2007, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 345, Springer.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    ROMANOWICZ, B.A. “On the Tesseral-Harmonics Resonance Problem in Artificial-Satellite Theory,” SAO Special Report 365, 1975, 52 pp; Part II, SAO Special Report 373, 1976, 30 pp.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    MOORE, P. “A Resonant Problem of Two Degrees of Freedom,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1983, pp. 31–47.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    MOORE, P. “A Problem of Libration with Two Degrees of Freedom,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 33, No. 1, 1984, pp. 49–69.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    VALK, S., LEMAÎTRE, A. and DELEFLIE, F. “Semi-Analytical Theory of Mean Orbital Motion for Geosynchronous Space Debris under Gravitational Influence,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 43, 2009, pp. 1070–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    MCCLAIN, W. D. A Recursively Formulated First-Order Semianalytic Artificial Satellite Theory Based on the Generalized Method of Averaging, Volume 1: The Generalized Method of Averaging Applied to the Artificial Satellite Problem, Computer Sciences Corporation CSC/TR-77/6010, 1977 (“the blue book”). Also: A Semianalytic Artificial Satellite Theory. Volume 1. Application of the Generalized Method of Averaging to the Artificial Satellite Problem, 1992.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    DANIELSON, D.A., NETA, B. and EARLY, L.W. Semianalytic Satellite Theory (SST): Mathematical Algorithms, Naval Postgraduate School, NPS Report NPS-MA-94-001, January 1994.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    FONTE, D.J., Implementing a 50 × 50 Gravity Field in an Orbit Determination System, Master of Science Thesis, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CSDL-T-1169. June 1993.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    SCHUTZ, B.E. and CRAIG, D.E. “GPS Orbit Evolution: 1998–2000,” Proceedings of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Denver, Colorado, Aug 14–17, 2000.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    INEICHEN, D., BEUTLER, G. and HUGENTOBLER, U. “Sensitivity of GPS and GLONASS Orbits with Respect to Resonant Geopotential Parameters,” Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 77, 2003, pp. 478–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    FROIDEVAL, L. and SCHUTZ, B.E. “Long arc Analysis of GPS Orbits,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 124, 2006, pp. 653–664.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    HORI, G.-I. “Theory of General Perturbation with Unspecified Canonical Variable,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1966, pp. 287–296.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    DEPRIT, A. 1969 “Canonical Transformations Depending on a Small Parameter,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 12–30.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    CAMPBELL, J.A. and JEFFERYS, W.H. “Equivalence of the Perturbation Theories of Hori and Deprit,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1970, pp. 467–473.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    DEPRIT, A. “Delaunay Normalisations,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1982, pp. 9–21.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    SCHUTZ, B.E. “Numerical Studies in the Vicinity of GPS Deep Resonance,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 105, 2000, pp. 287–302.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    BROUCKE, R. and CEFOLA, P.J. “On the Equinoctial Orbit Elements,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1972, pp. 303–310.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    HINTZ, G.R. “Survey of Orbit Element Sets,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, vol. 31, no. 3, 2008, pp. 785–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    DELHAISE, F. and HENRARD, J. “The Problem of Critical Inclination Combined with a Resonance in Mean Motion in Artificial Satellite Theory,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 55, 1993, pp. 261–153.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    KOZAI, Y. “Second-Order Solution of Artificial Satellite Theory without Air Drag,” Astronomical Journal, Vol. 67, No. 7, 1962, pp. 446–461.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    DEPRIT, A. and ROM, A. “The Main Problem of Artificial Satellite Theory for Small and Moderate Eccentricities,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1970, pp. 166–206.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    MÉTRIS, G. Théorie du mouvement des satellites artificiels — Développement des équations du mouvement moyen — Application à l’étude des longues périodes, Ph.D. Dissertation, Observatoire de Paris, 1991, 188 p.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    LYDDANE, R.H. “Small Eccentricities or Inclinations in the Brouwer Theory of the Artificial Satellite,” Astronomical Journal, Vol. 68, 1963, pp. 555–558.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    CHAO, C.-C.G. Applied Orbit Perturbation and Maintenance, The Aerospace Press, El Segundo, California — AIAA Inc., Reston, Virginia, 2005, p. 87.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    LARA, M., SAN-JUAN, J.F. and CEFOLA, P. “Long-Term Evolution of Galileo Operational Orbits by Canonical Perturbation Theory,” presented as paper IAC-C1.3.9 at the, 62nd International Astronautical Congress, Cape Town, South Africa, 2011.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    GARFINKEL, B. “A Theory of Libration,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1976, pp. 229–246.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    KAULA, W.M. Theory of Satellite Geodesy, Blaisdell Publishing Company, Waltham, Massachusetts, 1966, p. 50. Reprinted by Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, N.Y., 2000.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    SANDERS, J.A. and VERHULST, F. Averaging Methods in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York-Tokyo, Springer-Verlag 1985.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    PROULX, R., MCCLAIN, W., EARLY, L. and CEFOLA, P. “A Theory for the Short Periodic Motion due to the Tesseral Harmonic Gravity Field,” presented as paper AAS 81-180 at the AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Conference, North Lake Tahoe, Nev., August 1981.Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    CEFOLA, P. and BROUCKE, R. “On the Formulation of the Gravitational Potential in Terms of Equinoctial Variables,” presented as paper AIAA 75-9 at the AIAA 13th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Pasadena, CA, January 1975.Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    PARDINI, C. and ANSELMO, L. SATRAP: Satellite Reentry Analysis Program, Internal Report C94-17, CNUCE/CNR, Pisa, Italy, 30 August 1994.Google Scholar
  50. [50]
    CHAO, C.C. and GICK, R.A. “Long-Term Evolution of Navigation Satellite Orbits: GPS/GLONASS/GALILEO,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 34, 2004, pp. 1221–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    DELEFLIE, F., ROSSI, A., PORTMANN, C, MÉTRIS, G. and BARLIER, F. “Semi-Analytical Investigations of the Long Term Evolution of the Eccentricity of Galileo and GPS-Like Orbits,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 47, 2011, pp. 811–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    CARTER, S.S. Precision Orbit Determination From GPS Receiver Navigation Solutions, Master of Science Thesis, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. CSDL-T-1260, June 1996.Google Scholar
  53. [53]
    LARA, M., SAN-JUAN, J.F., FOLCIK, Z.J. and CEFOLA, P. “Deep Resonant GPS-Dynamics due to the Geopotential,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 140, 2011, pp. 1985–2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Astronautical Society, Inc. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Lara
    • 1
    Email author
  • Juan F. San-Juan
    • 2
  • Zachary J. Folcik
    • 3
  • Paul Cefola
    • 4
  1. 1.Real Observatorio de la ArmadaSan FernandoSpain
  2. 2.Universidad de La RiojaLogroñoSpain
  3. 3.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA
  4. 4.University at Buffalo, State University of New YorkAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations