The influence of restorative treatment approaches and the use of local analgesia, on the children’s discomfort
- 145 Downloads
Aim: The aim is to investigate possible differences in discomfort during treatment with the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) or the Conventional restorative method with and without local analgesia (LA). Methods: The study group consisted of 6 and 7 year-old children with no dental experience (mean age 6.98, SD± 0.52) randomly divided into four treatment groups: Conventional method with and without LA and ART with and without LA. One or two proximal lesions in primary molars were treated. The heart rate and the behaviour (Venham) were measured. Statistics: Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS version 10.0. Results: In a first session 300 children were treated and 109 children for a second time in the same way as at the first visit. During the first session ART without LA gave the least discomfort while the Conventional method without LA gave the most discomfort. During the second treatment the least discomfort was observed with ART without LA and the most discomfort in the Conventional way with LA. Conclusion: There is a constant preference for hand instruments; the bur is increasingly accepted. The experience with LA is the reverse.
KeywordsPaediatric Dentistry Dental Anxiety European Archive Atraumatic Restorative Technique Primary Molar
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Aartman I, van Everdingen T, Hoogstraten J, Schuurs A. Self report measurements of dental anxiety and fear in children: A critical assessment. J Dent Child, 1998; 252–258.Google Scholar
- Benjamins C (1995). Psychophysiological measurement of dental anxiety. Thesis Amsterdam: Academic Centre for Dentistry, The Netherlands, 1995.Google Scholar
- Berge ten M. On the structure of childhood dental fear, using the dental subscale of the children’s fear survey schedule. Dental fear in children: prevalence, etiology and risk factors (chapter 3.2), PhD thesis, ACTA, Amsterdam, 2001.Google Scholar
- Frencken JE, Holmgren CJ. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment for dental caries 1st Ed., Nijmegen ISBN 906759024X, 1999Google Scholar
- Lenters M, Amerongen WE van, Mandari GJ. A measure of iatrogenic damage to the adjacent surfaces of deciduous molars, in three different ways of cavity preparation. Eur. Arch. Paed. Dent. 2006;7: 6–10Google Scholar
- Mhaville R, van Amerongen W.E, Mandari G. Radiographic assessment of residual caries and marginal integrity after preparation in three different ways and restoration with hand mixed glass-ionomer. Eur. Arch. Paed. Dent. 2006; in pressGoogle Scholar
- Milgrom P, Coldwell SE, Getz T, Weinstein P, Ramsay DS. Four dimensions of fear of dental injections. Journ Am Dent Assoc 1997;128: 756–62Google Scholar
- Rahimtoola S, van Amerongen WE, Maher R, Groen H. Pain related to different ways of minimal intervention in the treatment of small caries lesions. J Dent Child 2000; 67:123–7.Google Scholar
- Veerkamp JSJ, Gruythuysen RJM, Amerongen WE van, Hoogstraten J. Dental treatment of fearful children using nitrous oxide. Part 3, anxiety during sequential visits. J Dent Child 1993;60: 175–82.Google Scholar