Advertisement

Welding in the World

, Volume 52, Issue 7–8, pp 79–92 | Cite as

Influence of Parent Metal Strength on the Fatigue Strength of Parent Material with Machined and Thermally Cut Edges

  • J.-O. Sperle
Research Supplement

Abstract

Trends towards more effective and lighter structures have increased the interest in using high strength steels for higher performance and reduced weight. Design measures for avoiding welds in highly stressed regions and the introduction of post-weld improvement of critical welds mean that unwelded sections also have to be assessed in the design of welded structures. In this investigation, hot rolled strip steels in thicknesses of 6–12 mm with minimum yield strengths from 240 to 900 MPa are fatigue tested under constant amplitude pulsating tensile loading. Specimens with as rolled surface and with machined, laser cut, plasma cut and oxygen cut edges are tested. The results are evaluated according to the IIW recommended practice. The surface roughness Rz has been measured for different surface conditions, including ground and as rolled surfaces, and compared to literature data. Thermal cutting methods have been developed appreciably over the years, especially for laser and plasma cutting. This means that the FAT classes evaluated here are higher than those recommended by IIW. The results show that if the quality of cutting can be kept high, the fatigue strength of strip steel, especially strip with laser and plasma cut edges, can be of the same order as that of steel strip with machined edges. Both empirical and physically based models are presented for the influence of surface roughness on the fatigue strength at different steel strength. A tentative recommendation is given for a steel strength enhancement factor for the influence of yield strength on the fatigue resistance at different values of surface roughness.

IIW-Thesaurus keywords

Fatigue strength High strength steels Mechanical properties Parent material Reference lists Steels Thermal cuts 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Trogen H., Olsson K-E., Spennare H.: Influence of cutting method and material static strength on the fatigue strength of test specimens, Proceedings of the Fist North European Engineering and Science Conference of Welded High Strength Steel structures, Stockholm, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Hobbacher A.: Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components, IIW doc. XIII-2151r1-07/XV-1254r1–07.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bergqvist L., Sperle J-O.: Fatigue strength of high strength steel beams with thermally cut surfaces, Doc. IIW-644-80 (ex doc. XIII-919–79), Welding in the World, 1980, Vol. 18, No 9/10, pp. 208–220.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Sonsino C.M., Kaufmann H., Müller F., Berghôfer U.: Schwingfestigkeit von hochfesten Feinkornbaustählen im brenngeschnittenen Zustand, Studiengesellshaft Stahlanwendung e.V., Projekt 185 — Forschungsbericht Juni 1992.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Nilsson T., Jansson S.: A comparison of Domex steel and other cold forming steel with laser cut edges, SSAB Tunnplát, Internal technical report no 970524 (in Swedish).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    SS-EN ISO 9013: Thermal cutting — Classification of thermal cuts — Geometrical product specification and quality tolerances (ISO 9013:2002), 2003-03–21, revision 2.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    The effect of surface roughness on the fatigue limit of steels at zero mean stress, Engineering Sciences Data Unit (ESDU), Publication no 74027, 1974.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Howse D.S., Hilton P.A.: A cutting process comparison, TWI report 605/1997.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Byggnevi M., Mrden N.: Fatigue performance of gas cut edges at R= −1, Proceedings of Int. Symposium on Integrated Design and Manufacturing of Welded Structures, March 13–14 2007, Eskilstuna, Sweden.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Fricke W., Weissenborn, Eggert: Erschliessung des hochfesten Stahls für den Schiffbau, Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg, Bericht Nr. 1/2004.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Sperle J-O., Nilsson T.: The application of high strength steels for fatigue loaded structures, Proceedings of HSLA Steels Conference, Beijing, 1992.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Gustafsson M. et al.: Internal database on fatigue test results, SSAB Tunnplåt AB.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Smith R.A.: Fatigue thresholds — A design engineer’s guide through the jungle, Proceedings of the Conference on Fatigue Thresholds, Stockholm, 1981.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Topper T.H., El Haddad M.H.: Fatigue strength prediction of notches based on fracture mechanics, Proceedings of the Conference on Fatigue Thresholds, Stockholm, 1981.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Olsson K-E.: Influence of surface roughness and steel strength — Proposal for a surface roughness factor (in Swedish), Internal document, Kea Quality, November 2005.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Olsson K-E.: Private communication.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Takahashi K., Murakami Y.: Quantitative evaluation of the effect of surface roughness on the fatigue strength, Report from Kyushu University, Japan.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Eylmann S., Paetzold H.: High tensile steel in ship structures — Fatigue tests on simple specimens, Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg, TUHH Report TD 03.52.05.01, 2004.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Paetzold H.: Beitrag zur Gütesicherung Unterwasser — Plasmageschittener Blechkanten in Der Schiffskonstruktion, Institute für Schiffbau der Universität Hamburg, Bericht Nr. 211/1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute of Welding 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.-O. Sperle
    • 1
  1. 1.Sperle Consulting ABSweden

Personalised recommendations