Skip to main content
Log in

Screening Wheat Genotypes for High Callus Induction and Regeneration Capability from Immature Embryo Cultures

  • Published:
Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selecting the explant genotypes is crucial step in in vitro culture and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system due to its host range specificity. Immature embryos of five winter and three spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L) cultivars were evaluated for tissue culture response in three callus initiation media. MS medium containing 2,4-0 (2 mg ml-1) plus B5 vitamins (MSB5), MS medium containing 2,4-0 (1 mg ml-1) with no vitamins (MS1GC) or MS medium containing picloram (2.2 mg ml-1) and 2,4-0 (0.5 mg ml-1) plus MS vitamins (CM4C) were used for callus initiation. Percentage of callus induction varied widely with the genotype and initiation medium used, with values ranging from 5.7% to 100%. Embryogenic capacity of genotypes was evaluated by number of somatic embryos formed from cultured immature embryos. Bob White (spring) and NE92458 (winter) were equal and most embryogenic; Pronghorn and 2137 (both winter) were the poorest. CM4C medium was found to be the best medium for initiating embryogenic callus among three culture media tested. A standard regeneration procedure was used. The genotypes with the highest regeneration efficiencies were Bob White, Fielder and NE92458, (1.8, 1.4 and 1.6 plantslexplant, respectively).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahloowalia BS, Crop Sci, 22 (1982) 405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sears RG & Deckard EL, Crop Sci, 22 (1982) 546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ozias-Akins P, & Vasil IK, Protoplasma, 110 (1982) 95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Weeks JT, Anderson OD & Blechl AE, Plant Physiol, 102 (1993) 1077.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Haliloglu K & Baenziger PS, Cereal Res Commun, 31 (2003) 9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mathias RJ & Simpson ES, Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult, 7 (1986) 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fennell S, Bohorova N, van Ginkel M, Crossa J & Hoisington D, Theor Appl Genet, 92 (1995) 163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elena EB & Ginzo HD, J Plant Physiol, 132 (1988) 600.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. He DG, Yang YM & Scott KJ, Plant Sci, 57 (1988) 225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carman JG, Jefferson NE & Campbell WF, Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult, 10 (1998) 101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng M, Joyce E, Pang S, Zhou H, Hironaka CM, Duncan DR, Conner TW & Wan Y, Plant Physiol, 115 (1997) 971.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Murashige T & Skoog F, Physiol Plant, 15 (1962) 473.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gamborg OL, Miller RA & Ojima K, Exp Cell Res, 50 (1968) 151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Waller RA & Duncan DB, J Am Stat Assoc, 64 (1969) 1484.

    Google Scholar 

  15. SAS Institute Inc. (1996) SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou H, Arrowsmith JW, Fromm ME, Hironaka CM, Taylor ML, Rodriguez, D, Pajeau ME, Brown SM, Santino CG & Fry JE, Plant Cell Rep, 15 (1995) 159.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. He DG, Yang TM, Bertram J & Scott KJ, Plant Sci, 68 (1990) 103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maddock SE, Lancaster VA, Risiott R & Franklin J, Exp Bot, 34 (1987) 915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Redway FA, Vasil V & Vasill K, Plant Cell Rep, 8 (1990) 714.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maheshwary N, Rajyalakshmi K, Baweja K, Dhir SK, Chowdhry CN & Maheshwary SC, Crfit Rev Plant Sci, 14 (1995) 149.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Boulton MI, Steinkellner H, Donson J, Markham PG, King DI & Davis KW, J Gen Viral, 70 (1989) 2309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mooney PA, Goodwin PB, Dennis ES & Liewellyn DJ, Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult, 25 (1991) 209.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamil Haliloqlu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haliloqlu, K., Baenziger, P.S. Screening Wheat Genotypes for High Callus Induction and Regeneration Capability from Immature Embryo Cultures. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 14, 155–160 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03263244

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03263244

Key words

Navigation