Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 179–184 | Cite as

Comparative evaluation of effects of chemo-mechanical and conventional caries removal on dentinal morphology and its bonding characteristics — An SEM study

  • R. AroraEmail author
  • M. Goswami
  • S. Chaudhary
  • T. R. Chaitra
  • A. Kishor
  • M. Rallan
Scientific Article

Abstract

AIM: To compare the efficacy of three caries removal techniques namely: Papacarie®, calcium hydroxide and rotary instruments by SEM analyses of the micro-morphology of residual dentine and resin tags at resin-dentine interface. METHODS: 45 extracted human permanent molar teeth, with occlusal caries extending up to dentine, were divided into two groups (Group 1 and 2) and each group was subdivided into three subgroups: subgroup A included teeth treated with conventional rotary method, subgroup B and C included those treated with calcium hydroxide and Papacarie® respectively. Group 1 samples were prepared for viewing the micro-morphology of residual dentine (2000x and 5000x) and Group 2 samples were filled with composite resin and analysed for resin tag formation (1000x) under SEM. RESULTS: Papacarie® showed minimal smear layer and open dentinal tubules. Calcium hydroxide and rotary instruments showed a typical smear layer and occluded dentinal tubules. Resin tags obtained with Papacarie® were the longest and significantly superior to those obtained with rotary and calcium hydroxide. CONCLUSIONS: Papacarie® exhibited better bonding characteristics of residual dentine than calcium hydroxide and rotary method of caries removal. Thus, Papacarie® is a suitable alternative to conventional method of caries removal, especially in paediatric patients.

Key words

Papacarie® calcium hydroxide rotary instrument SEM dentinal properties 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen M, Lund A, Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM. In vitro solubility of human pulp tissue in calcium hydroxide and sodium hypochlorite. Endodontics and Dent Traumatol 1992; 8:104–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banerjee A, Kidd EAM, Watson TF. Scanning electron microscopic observations of human dentine after mechanical caries excavation. J Dent 2000; 28:179–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beeley JA, Yip HK, Stevenson AG. Chemochemical caries removal: a review of the techniques and latest developments. Br Dent J 2000; 188:427–430.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bussadori S.K, Castro L.C, Galvao A.C. Papain Gel: A new chemo-mechanical caries removal agent. J Clin Ped Den 2005; 30:115–120.Google Scholar
  5. Bystrom A, Claesson R, Sundqvist G. The antibacterial effect of camphorated paramonochlorophenol, camphorated phenol and calcium hydroxide in the treatment of infected root canals. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985; 1:170–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrillo CM, Tanaka MH, Cesar MF et al. Use of papain gel in disabled patients. J Dent Child 2008; 75:222–228.Google Scholar
  7. Correa FNP, Rocha RDO, Filho LER, Muench A, Rodrigues CRMD. Chemical vs conventional caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a microhardness study. J Clin Ped Dent 2007a; 31:189–194.Google Scholar
  8. Correa FNP, Filho LER, Rodrigues CRMD. Evaluation of residual dentine after conventional and chemo-mechanical caries removal using SEM. J Clin Ped Dent 2007b; 32:115–120.Google Scholar
  9. Dammaschke T, Eickmeier M, Schafer E, Danesh G, Ott KHR. Effectiveness of Carisolv compared with sodium hypochlorite and calcium hydroxide. Acta Odont Scand 2005; 63:110–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elkholany NR, Abdelaziz KM, Zaghloul NM, Aboulenine N. Chemo-mechanical method: A valuable alternative for caries removal. Dent Update 2002; 9:16–22.Google Scholar
  11. Fava LRG, Saunders WP. Calcium hydroxide pastes: classification and clinical indications. Int Endod J 1999; 32:257–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferrari M, Grandini S, Simonetti M, Monticelli F, Goracci C. Influence of a microbrush on bonding fiber post into root canals under clinical conditions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94:627–631.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foreman PC, Barnes F. A review of calcium hydroxide. Int Endod J 1990; 23:283–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ganesh M, Parikh D. Chemo-mechanical caries removal agents: review and clinical application in primary teeth. Journal of Dentistry & Oral Hygiene 2011; 3:34–45.Google Scholar
  15. Hasselgren G, Olsson B, Cvek M. Effects of calcium hydroxide and sodium hypochlorite on the dissolution of necrotic porcine muscle tissue. J Endod 1988; 14:125–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hosoya Y, Shinkawa H, Marshall GW. Influence of Carisolv on resin adhesion for two different adhesive systems to sound human primary dentine and young permanent dentine J Dent 2001; 33:283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kotb RMS, Abdella AAH, El Kateb MA, Ahmed AM. Clinical evaluation of Papacarie in primary teeth. J Clin Ped Dent 2009; 34:117–123.Google Scholar
  18. Martins MD, Fernandes KPS, Motta LJ et al. Biocompatibility analysis of chemo-mechanical caries removal material Papacarie on cultured fibroblasts and subcutaneous tissue. J Dent Child 2009; 76:123–129.Google Scholar
  19. Pashley DH, Kalathoor S, Burnham D. The effects of calcium hydroxide on dentine permeability. J Dent Res 1986; 65:417–420.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peric T, Markovic D. In vitro effectiveness of a chemo-mechanical method for caries removal. Eur J Paed Dent 2007; 2:61–67.Google Scholar
  21. Piva E, Ogliari FA, de Moraes RR et al. Papain-based gel for biochemical caries removal: influence on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Braz Oral Res 2008; 22:364–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sivapathasundharam B and Raghu AR. Shafer’s textbook of oral pathology. Ed. 5th Elsevier; 2006: pg 567–658.Google Scholar
  23. Splieth C, Rosin M, Gellissen B. Determination of residual dentine caries after conventional mechanical and chemo-mechanical caries removal with Carisolv. Clin Oral Inves 2001; 5:250–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tonami KI, Araki K, Mataki S, Kurosaki N. Effect of chloramines and sodium hypochlorite on carious dentin. J Med Dent Sci 2003; 50:139–146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Tronstad L. Root resorption etiology, terminology and clinical manifestations. Endod Dent Traumatol 1988; 4:241–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yazici AR, Atilla P, Ozgunaltay G, Muftuoglu S. In vitro comparison of the efficacy of Carisolv™ and conventional rotary instrument in caries removal. J Oral Rehab 2003; 30:1177–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Arora
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Goswami
    • 1
  • S. Chaudhary
    • 1
  • T. R. Chaitra
    • 1
  • A. Kishor
    • 1
  • M. Rallan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Paedodontics and Preventive DentistryKothiwal Dental College and Research CentreMora Mustaqueem, MoradabadIndia

Personalised recommendations