Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 318–322 | Cite as

Identical twins revealing discordant hypodontia. The rationale of dental arch differences in monozygotic twins

  • M. VarelaEmail author
  • M. J. Trujillo-Tiebas
  • P. García-Camba
Case Report

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While it is generally accepted that monozygotic (MZ) twins are identical with respect to inherited traits, because they share 100% of their genetic material, clinical findings and scientific evidence does not support this belief. In addition to environmental factors and stochastic developmental events, a number of genetic mechanisms, detectable by new techniques in molecular genetics, explain the differences frequently observed in MZ twins. CASE REPORT: Nine-year-old twin girls requested treatment for a dental malocclusion. Their facial and occlusal features were very similar. Panoramic radiographs revealed hypodontia of two permanent teeth in one twin (35 and 45) and of only one tooth in the other (45). An incorrect diagnosis of dizygosity (DZ) had been made at birth based on the presence of two amniotic sacs. Despite discordance in the dental complement of both girls their orthodontist suspected that the twins might be identical. A genetic study performed by quantitative fluorescence-polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis of chromosomes 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, and X confirmed that the twins were MZ. CONCLUSION: Discordances in dental complement between MZ twins are not uncommon and do not exclude monozygosity.

Keywords

Twins hypodontia genetics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adinolfi M, Pertl B, Sherlock J. Rapid detection of aneuploidies by microsatellite and the quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction. Prenat Diagn 1997; 17:1299–1311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baba-Kawano S, Toyoshima Y, Regalado L, Sádo B, Nakasima A. Relationship between congenitally missing lower third molars and late formation of tooth germs. Angle Orthod 2002; 72:112–117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailleul-Forestier I, Molla M, Verloes A, Berdal A. The genetic basis of inherited anomalies of the teeth. Part 1: clinical and molecular aspects of nonsyndromic dental disorders. EurJ Med Genet 2008; 51:273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brook AH, Griffin RC, Smith RN et al. Tooth size patterns in patients with hypodontia and supernumerary teeth. Arch Oral Biol 2009; 54 Suppl 1:S63–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruder CE, Piotrowski A, Gijsbers AA, et al. Phenotypically concordant and discordant monozygotic twins display different DNA copy-number-variation profiles Am J Hum Genet 2008; 82: 763–771.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Couburne MT. Familial human hypodontia—is it all in the genes? Br Dent J 2007; 203:203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Das P, Stockton DW, Bauer C, et al. Haploinsufficiency of PAX9 is associated with autosomal dominant hypodontia. Hum. Genet 2002; 110:371–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dempsey PJ, Townsend GC. Genetic and environmental contributions to variation in human tooth size. Heredity 2001; 86: 685–693.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Paz MF, et al. Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005; 102:10604–10609.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gerits A, Nieminen P, De Muynck S, Carels C. Exclusion of coding region mutations in MSX1, PAX9 and AXIN2 in eight patients with severe oligo-dontia phenotype Orthod Craniofac Res 2006; 9:129–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gringras P and Chen W. Mechanisms for differences in monozygous twins. Early Hum. Dev 2001; 64:105–117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kapadia H, Frazier-Bowers S, Ogawa T, D’Souza RN. Molecular characterization of a novel PAX9 missense mutation causing posterior tooth agenesis. Europ. J. Hum. Genet 2006; 14:403–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kapadia H, Mues G, D’Souza R. Genes affecting tooth morphogenesis Orthod Craniofac Res 2007; 10:237–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kotsomitis N, Dunne MP, Freer TJ. A genetic aetiology for some common dental anomalies: a pilot twin study. Aust Orthod J 1996; 14:172–178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lapter M, Slaj M, Skrinjarić I, Muretić Z. Inheritance of hypodontia in twins. Coll Antropol 1998; 22:291–298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Larmour CJ, Mossey PA, Thind BS, Forgie AH, Stirrups DR. Hypodontia—a retrospective review of prevalence and etiology. Part I. Quintessence Int 2005; 36:263–270.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Martín N, Boomsma D, Machin G. A twin pronged attack on complex traits. Nat Genet 1997;17:387–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matalova E, Fleischmannova J, Sharpe PT, Tucker AS. Tooth agenesis: from molecular genetics to molecular dentistry. J Dent Res 2008; 87:617–623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Markovic M. Hypodontia in twins. Swed Dent J Suppl 1982; 15:153–162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Polder BJ, Van’t Hof MA, Van der Linden FP, Kuijpers-Jagman AM. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004; 32:217–226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Seddon RP, Johnstone SC, Smith PB. Mesiodentes in twins: a case report and a review of the literature. Int J Paediatr Dent 1997; 7:177–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Singh SM, Murphy B, O’Reilly R. Epigenetic contributors to the discordance of monozygotic twins Clin Gen 2002; 62:97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stapleton P, Weith A, Urbanek P, Kozmik Z, Busslinger M. Chromosomal localization of seven PAX genes and cloning of a novel family member, PAX-9. Nature Genet 1993; 3:92–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stockton DW, Das P, Goldenberg M, D’Souza RN, Patel PI. Mutation of PAX9 is associated with oligodontia (Letter). Nature Genet 2000; 24:18–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Swinnen S, Bailleul-Forestier I, Arte S, et al. Investigating the etiology of multiple tooth agenesis in three sisters with severe oligodontia. Orthod Craniofac Res 2008; 11:24–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Theslef I. Genetic basis of tooth development and dental defects. Acta Odontol Scand 2000; 58:191–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Townsend GC, Richards L, Hughes T, Pinkerton S, Schwerdt W. Epigenetic influences may explain dental differences in monozygotic twin pairs. Aust Dent J 2005; 50:95–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhu JF, Marcushamer M, King DL, Henry RJ. Supernumerary and congenitally absent teeth: a literature review. Clin Pediatr Dent 1996; 20:87–95.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Varela
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. J. Trujillo-Tiebas
    • 2
  • P. García-Camba
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept Orthodontics, Jiménez Díaz FoundationAutonomous UniversityMadridSpain
  2. 2.Genetics, Jiménez Díaz FoundationAutonomous UniversityMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations