European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 12, Issue 5, pp 245–249 | Cite as

Comparative evaluation of chlorhexidine mouthrinse versus cacao bean husk extract mouthrinse as antimicrobial agents in children

  • N. S. Venkatesh BabuEmail author
  • D. K. Vivek
  • G. Ambika


AIM: To compare the antimicrobial efficiency of chlorhexidine and cacao bean husk extract mouthrinses in children. STUDY DESIGN: A randomised comparative study which employed purpose sampling. METHODS: Study was conducted on 50 children of both sexes aged 6–10 years old. A group of 25 children were given 10 ml of 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinse and another 25 children were given 10 ml of 0.1% cacao bean extract mouthrinse to rinse twice daily for about 30 seconds. The salivary samples were collected from each child in Dentocult SM vials on day one (pre-rinse) and after 7 days, 1 month and 2 months. The readings were tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis. STATISTICS: Mann-Whitney test and the p-value were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: There was significant reduction in streptococcus mutans counts in saliva at all follow-up intervals for both mouthrinse groups. However, there was no significant difference in reduction of streptococcus mutans counts in saliva, between chlorhexidine mouthrinse group and cacao bean husk extract mouthrinse group. CONCLUSION: Cacao bean husk extract mouthrinse can be used in children as an alternative to chlorhexidine mouthrinse as it has similar antimicrobial properties and evades the side-effects of the latter.

Key words

Chlorhexidine mouthrinse cacao bean husk extract mouthrinse Dentoccult test 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beyth N, Redlich M, Harari D, Friedman M, Steinberg D. Effect of sustainedrelease CHX varnish on MS and Actinomyces viscosus in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123:345–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowden GHW. Which bacteria are cariogenic in man in markers of high and low risk groups and individuals for Dental Caries (ed. Johnson N.W.) 1991, Cambridge Univ Press PP: 266–286.Google Scholar
  3. Eriksen HM, Nordbo H, Kantanen H, Ellingsen JE. Chemical plaque control and extrinsic tooth discoloration. A review of possible mechanisms. J Clin Periodontol 1985; 12:345–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Greenstein G, Berman C, Jaffin R. CHX. An adjunct to periodontal therapy. J Periodontol 1986; 57:370–377.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hefti A, Huber B. The effect on early plaque formation gingivitis and salivary bacterial counts of mouth washes containing hexidine/zinc amine fluoride/tin or CHX. J Clinic Periodontal 1987; 14: 515–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heasman PA, Seymour SS. Pharmacological control of periodontal disease, Antiplaque agents. J Dent 1995; 22:323–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kashket, S, Paolino VJ, Lewis DA, Van Houte J. In-vitro inhibition of glucosyltransferase from the dental plaque bacterium streptococcus mutan by common beverages and food extracts. Arch Oral Biol 1985; 30:821–826.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kornmann KS. Antimicrobial agents. In: Loe H, Klienman DV, eds; Dental plaque control measures and oral hygiene practices. Oxford: IRL Press, 1986: 121–42.Google Scholar
  9. Löe H, Schiött CR. The effect of mouth rinses and topical application of CHX on the development of dental plaque and gingivitis in man. J Periodontal Res 1970; 5:79–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mandel ID. Chemotherapeutic agents for controlling plaque and gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol 1988; 15:488–493.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Matsumoto M, Tsuji M, Okuda J et al. Inhibitory effects of cocoa bean husk extract on plaque formation in vitro and in vivo. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112:249–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Osawa K, Miyazaki K, Shimura S et al. Identification of cariostatic substances in the cacao bean husk: Their anti-glucosyltransferase and antibacterial activities. J Dent Res 2001; 80:2000–2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Percival RS, Devine DA, Duggal MS, Chartron S, Marsh PD. The effect of cocoa polyphenols on the growth, metabolism and biofilm formation by MS and streptococcus sanguis; Eur J Oral Sci 2006; 114:343–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sari E, Birinci I. Microbiological evaluation of 0.2% CHX gluconate mouth rinse in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77:881–884.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Srikanth RK, Shashikiran ND, Subba Reddy VV. Chocolate mouth rinse: Effect on plaque accumulation and mutans streptococci counts when used by children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2008; 26:67–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Spets-Happonen S, Markanen H, Pollanen L, Kauppinen T, Luoma H. Salivary MS count and gingivitis in children after rinsing with a CHX-fluoride solution with or without strontium. Scand J Dent Res 1985; 93: 329–335.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Strålfors, A. Inhibition of Hamster Caries by Substances in Chocolate, Arch Oral Biol 1967; 12:959–962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. S. Venkatesh Babu
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. K. Vivek
    • 1
  • G. Ambika
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pedodontics and Preventive DentistryV.S. Dental College and HospitalBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations