Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 11, Issue 5, pp 247–252 | Cite as

Validation of a Greek version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) in adolescents

  • T. Roumani
  • Constantine J. OulisEmail author
  • V. Papagiannopoulou
  • J. Yfantopoulos
Article

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Greek version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) (short form) in adolescents. METHODS: A total of 112 healthy adolescents (15–18 years) from various socioeconomic backgrounds were randomly selected and participated in a clinical oral examination conducted by a calibrated dentist and on the same day a face to face interview was held for assessing the psychometric properties of the OHIP-14 in Greek adolescents. RESULTS: Cronbach’s coefficient, was used to evaluate the internal consistency of the instrument and a value of a=0.8 was found indicating exceptional internal consistency. Discriminant validity and convergent validity was assessed and the inter-item correlation coefficients ranged from −0.01 to 0.8 and the item-total correlation coefficients varied from 0.17 to 0.6. Important statistical correlations were also observed between the OHIP-14 and all the clinical measures, confirming that the questionnaire can distinguish between individuals with and without impacts on their oral health. The OHIP-14 total score proved to have high associations with both self-perceived oral health status (rs=0.36; p=0.01) and self-assessment of oral satisfaction (rs=0.4; p=0.01). Examination of the relationship between these parameters and the score of each domain also lead to similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The Greek version of OHIP-14 instrument was found to be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing oral health-related quality of life in Greek adolescents.

Keywords

Adolescents validation Oral health impact profile 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen PF, McMillan AS, Locher D. An assessment of sensitivity to change of the Oral Health Impact Profile in a clinical trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2001; 29:175–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison P, Locker D, Jokovic A, Slade G. A cross-cultural study of oral health values. J Dent Res. 1999;78:643–649.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biazevic MG, Rissotto RR, Crosato EM, Mendes LA, Mendes MO. Relationship between oral health and its impact on quality of life among adolescents. Brazil Oral Res 2008;22:36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broder HL, Slade G, Caine R, Reisine S. Perceived impact of oral health conditions among minority adolescents. J Public Health Dent 2000;60:189–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Oliveira BH, Nadanovsky P. Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-short form. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005;33:307–314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dolan TA, Peek CW, Stuckm AE, Beck JC. Three-year changes in global oral health rating by elderly dentate adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:62–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ekanayake L, Perera I. Validation of a Sinhalese translation of the Oral Health Impact profile-14 for use with older adults. Gerodontology 2003;20:95–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foster Page LA, Thomson WM, Jocovic A, Locher D. Validation of the child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ 11–14). J Dent Res 2005; 84:649–652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garratt A, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of Life Measurement: Bibliographic Study of Patients Assessed Health Outcome Measures. BMJ 2002;324:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greene JC, Vermillion JR. The simplified oral hygiene index. J Amer Dent Assoc 1964;68:7–13.Google Scholar
  11. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of healthrelated quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:1417–1432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jocovic A, Locher D, Stephens M, et al. Validity and reliability of a questionnaire for measuring child oral-health related quality of life. J Dent Res 2002;81:459–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. John MT, Patrick DL, Slade GD. The German version of the oral health impact profile-translation and psychometric properties. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110:425–433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Locker D, Allen PF. Developing short-form measures of oral health-related quality of life. J Public Health Dent 2002;62:13–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Locker D, Jokovic A, Clarke M. Assessing the responsiveness of measures of oral health-related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32:10–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Locker D, Slade GD. Oral health and the quality of life among older adults: the Oral Health Impact Profile. J Can Dent Assoc. 1993;59:830–833, 837–838, 844.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lopez R, Baelum V. Spanish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-sp). BMC Oral Health 2006;6:11–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Montero-Martín J, Bravo-Peréz M, Albaladejo-Martínez A, et al. Validation of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14sp) for adults in Spain. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14:44–50.Google Scholar
  19. Oulis C.J, Theodorou M., Mastrogiannakis T., et al. Oral health status and treatment needs of the Hellenic population. Proposals for improvement. Hellenic Stomatol. Review 2009;53:97–120.Google Scholar
  20. Pitts NB, Evans DJ, Pine C. British association for the study of community dentistry (BASCD) diagnostic criteria for caries prevalence surveys-1996/1997. Community Dent Health 1997;14(suppl 1):6–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Papagiannopoulou V, Pittadaki J, Peistreris P, Pokas ?, Yfantopoulos. J. Health-related quality of life of people with haemophilia in Greece. Arch Hellenic Medicine 2007;24:85–92.Google Scholar
  22. Population Census of Greece (2001): General Secretariat of the National Statistical Service of Greece. Distribution of economically active de facto population based on socioeconomic status and sex for the whole country, rural and urban areas. http://www.statistics.gr/portal/page/portal/ESYE/BUCKET/.pdf
  23. Robinson PG, Gibson B, Khan FA, Birnbaum W. Validity of two oral health-related quality of life measures. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003;31:90–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Slade GD, Spenser AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health.1994;11:3–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Soe KK, Gelbien S, Robinson PG. Reliability and validity of two oral health related quality of life measures in Myanmar adolescents. Community Dental Health 2004;21:306–311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Streiner DL, Norman GL. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. p. 144–162.Google Scholar
  27. Tsakos G, Marcenes W, Sheiham A. Evaluation of a modified version of the index of oral impacts on Daily performances (OIDP) in elderly populations in two European countries. Gerodontology 2001;18:121–130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yfantopoulos J. The Greek version of the EuroQol (EQ-5D) instrument. Arch Hellenic Medicine 2001;18:180–191.Google Scholar
  29. Von Rueden U, Gosch A, Rajmil L, Bisegger C, Ravens-Sieberer U. Socioeconomic determinants of health related quality of life in childhood and adolescence: Results from European Study. J Epidemiol Health 2006;60:130–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wong MC, Lo EC, McMillan AS. Validation of a Chinese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2002;30:423–430.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Roumani
    • 1
  • Constantine J. Oulis
    • 1
    Email author
  • V. Papagiannopoulou
    • 2
  • J. Yfantopoulos
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Paediatric Dentistry, School of DentistryUniversity of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.Dept. of School of Law, Economic and Political SciencesUniversity of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations