Acceptance by Spanish parents of behaviour-management techniques used in Paediatric Dentistry
- 157 Downloads
- 6 Citations
Abstract
AIM: This was to examine the attitude of a group of Spanish parents towards behaviour-management techniques used in paediatric dentistry. METHODS: A video with 8 different behaviour-management techniques used in paediatric dentistry was shown to 50 parents whose children were being treated at the International University of Catalonia (Barcelona, Spain). The techniques shown were: tell-show-do, nitrous-oxide sedation, passive restraint, voice control, handover-mouth (HOM), oral premedication, active restraint and general anaesthesia. Parents gave an acceptance rating of each of these techniques according to a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being the lowest level of acceptance and 10 the highest. RESULTS: The technique rated as most acceptable was the tell-show-do technique, while the least accepted was the HOM technique. An association was found between acceptance of the different techniques and the socioeconomic status and gender of the parent, and the differences were statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were found regarding the age or gender of the child treated, or the previous dental experiences of those interviewed or of their children, with acceptance of each of the techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The techniques were well accepted by all those surveyed with the exception of HOM technique and the use of the papoose board. On comparing this study to other studies previously carried out in other areas of the world, similar results were found.
Key words
Behaviour management behaviour-management techniques parental attitudePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Bowers LT. The legality of using hand-over-mouth exercise for management of child behavior. J Dent Child 1982; 49:257–65.Google Scholar
- Casamassimo PS, Wilson S, Gross L. Effects of changing US parenting styles on dental practice:Perceptions of diplomates of the American Board of Paediatric Dentistry presented to the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Paediatric Dentistry 16th Annual Session, Atlanta, Ga, May 26, 2001. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24:18–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davis MJ. Conscious sedation in paediatric dentistry:A survey of members of the American Board of Paediatric Dentistry College of Diplomates. Pediatr Dent 1988; 10:328–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eaton JJ, McTigue DJ, Fields HW, Beck FM. Attitudes of contemporary parents toward behavior management techniques used in paediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent 2005; 27:107–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frankel RI. The Papoose Board and mothers’ attitudes following its use. Pediatr Dent 1991; 13:284–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Foley J. Nitrous oxide inhalation sedation:what do patients, carers and dentists think about it? Eur J Paediatr Dent 2005; 6:23–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Havelka C, McTigue D, Wilson S, Odom J. The influence of social status and prior explanation on parental attitudes toward behavior management techniques. Pediatr Dent 1992; 14:376–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Houpt M. Project USAP:The use of sedative agents in paediatric dentistry:1991 update. Pediatr Dent 1993; 15:36–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klingberg G, Berggren U, Norén JG. Dental fear in an urban Swedish population:prevalence and concomitant factors. Community Dent Health 1994; 11:208–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klingberg G, Broberg AG. Dental fear/anxiety and dental behaviour management problems in children and adolescents:a review of prevalence and concomitant psychological factors. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007; 17:391–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Klingberg G. Dental anxiety and behaviour management problems in paediatric dentistry-a review of background factors and diagnostics. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2008; 9(Suppl 1):11–5.Google Scholar
- Lee CY, Chang YY, Huang ST. Prevalence of dental anxiety among 5-to 8-year-old Taiwanese children. J Public Health Dent 2007; 67:36–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kuhn BR, Allen KD. Expanding child behavior management technology in paediatric dentistry:A behavior science perspective. Pediatr Dent 1994; 16:13–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lawrence SM, McTigue DJ, Wilson S, et al. Parental attitudes toward behavior management techniques used in paediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent 1991; 13:151–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Long N. The changing nature of parenting in America. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26:121–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murphy MG, Fields HW, Machen JB. Parental acceptance of paediatric dentistry behavior management techniques. Pediatr Dent 1984; 6:193–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oueis HS, Ralstrom E, Miriyala V, Molinari GE, Cassamassinmo P. Alternatives for Hand Over Mouth Exercise after its elimination from the clinical guidelines of the American Academy of Paediatric Dentistry. Pediatr Dent 2010;32:223–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Quinby DJ, Sheller B, Williams BJ, Grembowski D. Parent satisfaction with emergency dental treatment at a Children’s Hospital. J Dent Child (Chic) 2004; 71:17–23.Google Scholar
- Scott S, Garcia-Godoy F. Attitudes of Hispanic parents toward behavior management techniques. J Dent Child 1988; 65:128–31.Google Scholar
- Sheller B. Challenges of managing child behavior in the 21 st century dental setting. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26:111–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wogelius P, Poulsen S, Sørensen HT. Prevalence of dental anxiety and behavior management problems among six to eight years old Danish children. Acta Odontol Scand 2003; 61:178–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wright GZ. Behavior Management in Dentistry for Children. Ed. WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia; 1975.Google Scholar