European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 131–135 | Cite as

In Vitro and ln Vivo Assessment of Newly Developed Slow-Release Fluoride Glass Device

  • Nahla S. Al IbrahimEmail author
  • J. F. Tahmassebi
  • K. J. Toumba


BACKGROUND: The concept of constant and low levels of F intra-orally has been applied in dentistry using a controlled-release delivery system in different forms of slow-release F intra-oral devices. AIM: To investigate the effect of newly shaped plastic brackets on the level of fluoride released by the devices in vitro and to compare the level of fluoride released by unilateral versus bilateral slow-release fluoride glass devices in adults in vivo. STUDY DESIGN: The phase I, in vitro assessment involved 15 slow-release fluoride glass devices divided into three groups. Group A contained five glass beads, Group B, five fluoride devices placed with the plastic brackets facing down, and Group C, five fluoride devices placed with the plastic brackets facing up. Evaluation of fluoride release was carried out daily for a week, weekly for a month, and monthly for 18 months. The In vivo phase II involved 20 adults (mean age 29.7 ± 2.3 years) randomly divided and had unilateral or bilateral slow-release fluoride glass devices placed for six months. RESULTS: Groups A and B released fluoride for up to ten months. In Group C, the glass beads became loose at the end of the first month and were excluded from further analysis. There was no statistical significant difference in the mean of total fluoride released by Groups A and B. All participants showed higher salivary fluoride levels than at baseline. There was no statistically significant difference in the level of fluoride released by the bilateral and unilateral groups. CONCLUSIONS: The newly shaped slow-release fluoride glass devices showed continuous, safe, and effective fluoride release.

Key words

slow-release Fluoride Glassdevice 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andreadis GA. Slow-release fluoride glass devices, fluoride release and retention, in vivo and in vitro study. MDSc thesis. University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. Andreadis GA, Toumba KJ, Curzon MEJ. Slow-release fluoride glass devices: in vitro fluoride release and retention of devices in children. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2006; 7(4):258–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benzo Z, Escalona, Salas J, Gomez C, Quintal M, Maracono, Ruiz F, Garaboto A, Bartoli F. Evaluation of select variables in the ion chromatographic determination of F-, Cl-, Br-, NO-3, SO-24, and PO-34 in serum samples. J Chromatogr Sci 2002; 40:101–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooks ES, Miller BH, Nakajima H, Guo I. Manipulation effects on fluoride release from chemically-cured and resin-modified glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1997; 10:120–122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. De Moor RJ, Verdeck RM, De Maeyer EA. Fluoride release profiles of restorative glass ionomer formulations. Dent Mater 1996; 12:88–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Featherstone JDB. Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level Fluoride. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999; 27(1):31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Featherstone JDB. Delivery challenges for fluoride, chlorhexidine and Xylitol. BMC Oral Health 2006; 15(6) Suppl (1):S8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forsten L. Short and long-term fluoride release from glass ionomers and other fluoride-containing filling materials in vitro. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 98:179–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fritz JS. Early milestones in the development of ion-exchange chromatography: a personal account. J Chromatogr 2004; 1039(1–2):3–12.Google Scholar
  10. Kapetania I. Effect of fluoride slow release glass devices on salivary and plaoue levels of fluoride, calcium and phosphorus. MDSc thesis. University of Leeds, Leeds, England, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. Leverett DH, Featherstone JD, Proskin HM, Adair SM, Eisenberg AD, Mundorff-Shrestha SA, Shields CP, Shaffer CL, Billings RJ. Caries risk assessment by a cross-sectional discrimination model. J Dent Res 1993; 72(2):529–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McCabe JF. Resin-modified glass-ionomers. Biomaterials 1998; 19(6):521–527.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McCabe JF, Carrick TE, Sidhu SK. Determining low levels of fluoride released from resin based dental materials. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110:380–384.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Paul S, Tandon S, Murthy K. Effect of fluoride dentifrices on salivary fluoride levels in children. Indian J Dent Res 1993; 4:95–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Shaw AJ, Carrick T, McCabe JF. Fluoride release from glass-ionomer and compomer restorative materials: 6 months data. J Dent 1998; 26:355–359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shields CP, Leverett DH, Adair SM, Featherstone JDB. Salivary fluoride levels in fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities. J Dent Res 1987; (Spec Iss)141 (Abstract No. 277).Google Scholar
  17. Tatsi C. Effect of fluoride slow release glass devices on salivary and gingival crevicular fluid levels of fluoride, a pilot study. MDSc thesis. University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, 2006.Google Scholar
  18. ten Cate JM. Review on fluoride, with special emphasis on calcium fluoride mechanism in caries prevention. Eur J Oral Sci 1997; 105:461–465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ten Cate JM. Current concepts on the theories of the mechanism of action of fluoride. Acta Odontol Scand 1999; 57(6):325–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Toumba KJ. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of a slow —release fluoride glass for the prevention of dental caries in high-risk children. Ph.D. thesis. University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, 1996.Google Scholar
  21. Toumba KJ, Curzon MEJ. Slow release fluoride. Caries Res 1993; 27 Suppl (1):43–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Toumba KJ, Curzon MEJ. A clinical trial of a slow-releasing fluoride device in children. Caries Res 2005; 39(3):195–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nahla S. Al Ibrahim
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. F. Tahmassebi
    • 1
  • K. J. Toumba
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Child Dental Health, Leeds Dental InstituteUniversity of LeedsLeedsEngland

Personalised recommendations