Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 122–130 | Cite as

Reasons for extractions, and treatment preceding caries-related extractions in 3–8 year-old children

  • N. Mansour Ockell
  • M. BågesundEmail author
Article

Abstract

AIM: This was to analyse the tooth types extracted and the reasons for extractions in 3–8 year-old Swedish children. Another aim was to determine what treatments and attendance patterns preceded the caries-related extractions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective study of all 5,045 dental records of the 3–8 year-olds at six public dental clinics in a Swedish county was performed to find all extractions performed during one year and the reason for each extraction. The dental records, that included a caries-related extraction of a primary molar, were further analysed to find possible non-attended dental visits and treatments preceding the extraction. STATISTICS: The data were analysed using Pearson correlation test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-2 test. RESULTS: 309 (4 permanent and 305 primary) extractions were performed in 206 (119M, 87F) (4.1%) of the patients. The primary molar was the tooth type most frequently extracted, while the central primary incisor was the tooth most frequently extracted. Reasons for extractions were; caries: 60.5%, orthodontics: 11.3%, trauma: 10.4%, other reasons: 17.8 %. Dental records from 100 children with caries-related extractions of primary molars were analysed. A previous treatment had been performed in 51.0% of the caries-related extractions of primary molars, but only 24.0% had any long term restoration material with glass ionomer cement, composite resin or compomer. Non-attendance frequency prior to caries-related extraction of primary molar was higher (P=0.004) among the non-treated children, but 40.1% of the non-treated children had no missed appointments. Caries-related extractions were more common among boys (p=0.0315). CONCLUSIONS: Every 25th child in the age-group 3–8 years had extractions performed during a one-year period. Only every second primary molar had received any treatment before caries-related extraction, and only 24% had received long-term restorations. A considerable number (40%) of the non-treated children had no missed appointments before the caries related extractions. The routines for dental care and caries treatment in the primary dentition need a revision.

Key words

attendance caries extraction reason treatment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agerholm D. Reasons for extraction by dental practitioners in England and Wales: a comparison with 1986 and variations between regions. J Dent 2001;29:237–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ak G, Sepet E, Pinar A, Aren G, Turan N. Reasons for early loss of primary molars. Oral Health Prev Dent2005;3:113–117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Alm A, Wendt LK, Koch G. Dental treatment in the primary dentition of 7–12 year-old Swedish schoolchildren. Swed Dent J 2003;27:77–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Alm A, Wendt LK, Koch G. Dental treatment of the primary dentition in 7–12 year-old Swedish children in relation to caries experience at 6 years of age. Swed Dent J 2004;28:61–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Alm A, Wendt LK, Koch G, Birkhed D. Oral hygiene and parent-related factors during early childhood in relation to approximal caries at 15 years of age. Caries Res 2008;42:28–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Shammari KF, Al-Ansari JM, Al-Melh MA, Al-Khabbaz AK. Reasons for tooth extraction in Kuwait. Med Princ Pract 2006;15:417–422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alsheneifi T, Hughes C. Reasons for extractions in children. Pediatr Dent 2001;23:109–112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Angelillo IF, Anfosso R, Nobile CG, Pavia M. Prevalence of dental caries in schoolchildren in Italy. Eur J Epidemiol 1998;14:351–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borum MK, Andreasen JO. Sequelae of trauma to primary maxillary incisors. I. Complications in the primary dentition. Endod Dent Traumatol 1998;14:31–44.Google Scholar
  10. Fried I, Erickson P. Anterior tooth trauma in the primary dentition: incidence, classification, treatment methods, and sequelae: a review of the literature. ASDC J Dent Child 1995;62:256–261.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Glendor U, Halling A, Andersson L, Eilert-Petersson E. Incidence of traumatic tooth injuries in children and adolescents in the county of Västmanland, Sweden. Swed Dent J 1996;20:15–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Glendor U. Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries-a 12 year review of the literature. Dent Traumatol 2008;24:603–611.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hugoson A, Koch G, Helkimo AN, Lundin SA. Caries prevalence and distribution in individuals aged 3–20 years in Jönköping, Sweden, over a 30-year period (1973–2003). Int J Paediatr Dent 2008;18:18–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Järvinen S, Lahtinen L. Prevalence of extracted primary canines and molars in children aged 3 to 6 years in the city of Lahti. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1978;74:27–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jovino-Silveira RC, Caldas Ade F Jr, de Souza EH, Gusmão ES. Primary reason for tooth extraction in Brazilian adult population. Oral Health Prev Dent 2005;3:151–157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kay EJ, Blinkhorn AS. The reasons underlying the extraction of teeth in Scotland. Br Dent J 1986;160:287–290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klock KS, Haugejorden O. An analysis of primary and contributing reasons for extraction of permanent teeth given by the dentist. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:371–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Restorative materials in the primary dentition of poli-caries patients. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2007;8:29–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levine RS, Pitts NB, Nugent ZJ. The fate of 1,587 unrestored carious deciduous teeth: a retrospective general dental practice based study from northern England. Br Dent J 2002;193:99–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewis MA. Why we must reduce dental prescription of antibiotics: European Union Antibiotic Awareness Day. Br Dent J 2008;205:537–538.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCaul LK, Jenkins WM, Kay EJ. The reasons for the extraction of various tooth types in Scotland: a 15-year follow up. J Dent 2001;29:401–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Menghini G, Steiner M, Thomet E, Roos M, Imfeld T. Caries prevalence in children in the city of Zürich. Community Dent Health 2008;25:154–160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Milsom KM, Tickle M, Blinkhorn AS. Dental pain and dental treatment of young children attending the general dental service. Br Dent J 2002;192:280–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Milsom KM, Tickle M, Humphris GM, Blinkhorn AS. The relationship between anxiety and dental treatment experience in 5-year-old children. Br Dent J 2003;194:503–506.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Richards W, Ameen J, Coll AM, Higgs G. Reasons for tooth extraction in four general dental practices in South Wales. Br Dent J 2005;198:275–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rönnerman A. The effect of early loss of tooth eruption and space conditions. A longitudinal study. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;35:229–2239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Skaret E, Raadal M, Berg E, Kvale G. Dental anxiety and dental avoidance among 12 to 18 year olds in Norway. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107:422–428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tickle M, Milsom K, King D, Kearney-Mitchell P, Blinkhorn A. The fate of the carious primary teeth of children who regularly attend the general dental service. Br Dent J 2002a;192:219–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tickle M, Milsom KM, Blinkhorn AS. Inequalities in the dental treatment provided to children: an example from the UK. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2002b;30:335–341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tickle M, Threlfall AG, Pilkington L, et al. Approaches taken to the treatment of young children with carious primary teeth: a national cross-sectional survey of general dental practitioners and paediatric specialists in England. Br Dent J 2007;203:102–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Trovik TA, Klock KS, Haugejorden O. Trends in reasons for tooth extractions in Norway from 1968 to 1998. Acta Odontol Scand 2000;58:89–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tunison W, Flores-Mir C, ElBadrawy H, Nassar U, El-Bialy T. Dental arch space changes following premature loss of primary first molars: a systematic review. Pediatr Dent 2008;30:297–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang NJ, Aspelund GØ. Children who break dental appointments. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2009;10:11–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Williamson R, Queis H, Cassamassimo PS, Thikkurissy S. Association between early childhood caries and behavior as measured by the child behavior checklist. Pediatr Dent 2008;30:505–509.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Orthodontics, Public Dental ServiceCounty of Västra GötalandGöteborgSweden
  2. 2.TAKO-centreLovisenberg Diakonale HospitalOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations