European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 105–112 | Cite as

Debridement could be a solution to promote healing of established oral mucositis in children

  • Ç. E. ÇubukçuEmail author
  • B. Sevinir


Aim: The aim of the study was to present a novel approach to promote healing of established oral mucositis and to alleviate symptom clusters in a group of children who were on induction chemotherapy. Study Design: A clinical prospective study. Methods: Children (40) diagnosed with Grade 3 or 4 oral mucositis were randomly assigned into two groups: In Group I (n=20), accumulated debris on ulcerations was removed (debridement); In Group II (n=20), subjects had no debridement. The condition of oral lesions, speech, lips, teeth, saliva, gingiva, and swallowing ability were examined 3 x week during the study. All subjects received the same oral care regimen. They were well balanced in respect of age, the type of antineoplastic treatment, and the number. Results: Debridement promoted resolution and decreased the severity of oral mucositis significantly. Thus, the subjects had less oral discomfort, pain, and nutritional difficulties. Statistics: The data were entered in the SPSS 13.0 program, and the tests used were Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Shapiro-Wilk, Mann-Whitney, and Spearman’s correlation coefficient with a 5% significance level. Conclusion: Well-controlled, prospective clinical studies related to the management of established oral mucositis will lead to the development of potential interventions and improved patient care.

Key words

Oral mucositis debridement/resolution children 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersson P, Persoson L, Hallberg IR, Renvert S. Testing an oral assessment guide during chemotherapy treatment in a Swedish care setting: a pilot study. J Clin Nurs 1999; 8:150–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armitage R Berry G. Inferences from proportions. In: Armitage P, Berry G, eds. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific 1994; 118–132.Google Scholar
  3. Barker GJ. Current practices in the oral management of the patient undergoing chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation. Support Care Cancer 1999; 7:17–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonnaure-Mallet M, Bunetel L, Tricot-Doleux S, et al. Oral complications during treatment of malignant diseases in childhood: effects of tooth brushing. Eur J Cancer 1998; 10:1588–1591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown CG, Yoder LH. Stomatitis: an overview. Oncol Nurs Update 2002; 4:20–23.Google Scholar
  6. Childers NK, Stinnett EA, Wheeler P, et al. Oral complications in children with cancer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 75:41–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dodd MJ, Larson PJ, Dibble SL, et al. Randomized clinical trial of chlorhexidine versus placebo for prevention of oral mucositis in patients receiving chemotherapy. Oncol Nurs Forum 1996; 6:921–927.Google Scholar
  8. Dodd MJ, Miaskowski C, Greenspan D, et al. Radiation-induced mucositis: a randomized clinical trial of micronized sucralfate versus salt and soda mouthwashes. Cancer Invest 2003; 21:21–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eilers J. Nursing interventions and supportive care for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis associated with cancer treatment. Oncol Nurs Forum 2004; 31:13–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epstein JB, Schubert MM. Oral mucositis in myelosuppresive cancer therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 3:273–276.Google Scholar
  11. Epstein JB, Schubert MM. Oropharyngeal mucositis in cancer therapy. Review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Oncology (Huntingt) 2003; 12:1767–1779.Google Scholar
  12. Hsiao G, Sonis S. Oral mucositis. In: Hsiao G., Sonis S., eds. Interactive textbook on clinical symptom research, 2006. Available at: Scholar
  13. Leggott PJ. Oral complications of cancer therapies. Oral complications in the pediatric population. NCI Monogr 1990; 9:129–132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Madeya ML. Oral complications from cancer therapy: Part 1-Pathophysiology and secondary complications. Oncol Nurs Forum 1996; 5:801–807.Google Scholar
  15. Saadeh CE. Chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis: review of preventive strategies and treatment. Pharmacotherapy 2005; 4:54–55.Google Scholar
  16. Schubert MM, Williams BE, Lloid ME, Donaldson G, Chapko MK. Clinical assessment scale for the rating of oral mucosal changes associated with bone marrow transplantation. Development of an oral mucositis index. Cancer 1992; 69:2469–2477.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Scully C, MacFarlane TW. Orafacial manifestations of childhood malignancy: clinical and microbiological findings during remission. J Dent Child 1983; 59:121–125.Google Scholar
  18. Sonis ST, Fazio R, Setkowicz A, Gottlieb D, Vorhaus C. Comparison of the nature and f frequency of medical problems among patients in general, specialty and hospital dental practices. J Oral Med 1983; 38:58–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wilkes JD. Prevention and treatment of oral mucositis following cancer chemotherapy. Semin Oncol 1998; 5:538–551.Google Scholar
  20. Williams MC, Martin MV. A longitudinal study of the effects on the oral mucosa of treatment for acute childhood leukemia. Int J Paediatr Dent 1992; 2:73–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Paediatric Dental Care UnitUludao University, Faculty of Medicine, Görükle CampusBursaTurkey
  2. 2.Dept. Paediatric OncologyUludao University, Medical FacultyBursaTurkey

Personalised recommendations