Pharmaceutical Medicine

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 75–84

Biobanking Human Biological Materials

Issues Surrounding the Collection of Samples for Use in Future Research
Review Article
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

The practice of collecting and storing human biological materials for use in future biomedical research protocols engenders a wide variety of complex legal, ethical and social concerns. In recent years these concerns have received an enormous amount of attention, both in the US and internationally, in public and professional discourse and literature. This article reviews, on a broadly inclusive but inevitably selective basis, the most significant professional literature published in this arena during the last several years.

The literature documents tremendous diversity in clinical practice, policy advocacy and lay perceptions concerning informed consent for research participation by the human sources of biological materials, the privacy implications of collection and storage of biological materials for future research purposes, and questions pertaining to tissue ownership and the possibility of lucrative commercialization of the products of molecular genetics research conducted with human biological materials. Despite this lack of uniformity heretofore, there appears to be consensus emerging (which this article endorses) in the professional literature and public opinion around the position that it is in the long-term prudential self-interest of researchers, medical clinicians, policy makers and the public for both policy and practice in this area to respect and protect to the greatest extent reasonably feasible the dignity, autonomy and privacy rights of those persons who are actual or potential sources of human biological materials for research purposes, even if that approach may occasionally result in impeding the conduct of a particular research project in the short term.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams M, Prentice ED, Oki GSF. Ethical considerations in informed consent for potential future use of human tissue samples. IRB 1996 Mar–Apr; 18 (2): 6–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Häyry M, Chadwick R, Árnason V, et al. The ethics and governance of human genetic databases: European perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bregman-Eschet Y. Genetic databases and biobanks: who controls our genetic privacy? Santa Clara Comput High Tech Law J 2006 Nov; 23 (1): 1–54Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gibbons SMV, Kaye J, Smart A, et al. Governing genetic databases: challenges facing research regulation and practice. J Law Soc 2007 Jun; 34 (2): 163–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roche PA, Annas GJ. DNA testing, banking, and genetic privacy. N Engl J Med 2006 Aug 10; 355 (6): 545–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Terry SF, Terry PF. A consumer perspective on forensic DNA banking. J Law Med Ethics 2006 Sum; 34 (2): 408–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meslin EM, Quaid KA. Ethical issues in the collection, storage, and research use of human biological materials. J Lab Clin Med 2004 Nov; 144 (5): 229–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Andrews LB. Harnessing the benefits of biobanks. J Law Med Ethics 2005 Spr; 33 (1): 22–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rothstein MA, Knoppers BM. Introduction. J Law Med Ethics 2005 Spr; 33 (1): 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wendler D. What research with stored samples teaches us about research with human subjects. Bioethics 2002 Feb; 16 (1): 33–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Malinowski MJ. Taking genomics to the biobank: access to human biological samples and medical information. LA Law Rev 2005 Dec; 66 (1): 43–67Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chalmers D. Research involving humans: a time for change? J Law Med Ethics 2004 Win; 32 (4): 583–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Naser C, Alpert S. Genetic information, ethics, ethical issues in tissue banking and human subject research in stored tissues. In: Murray TH, Mehlman MJ, editors. Encyclopedia of ethical, legal, and policy issues in biotechnology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000: 363–9Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Witte C. Cord blood storage: property and liability issues. J Leg Med 2005 Jun; 26 (2): 275–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rothstein MA. Expanding the ethical analysis of biobanks. J Law Med Ethics 2005 Spr; 33 (1): 89–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bauer K, Taub S, Parsi K. Ethical issues in tissue banking for research: a brief review of existing organizational policies. Theor Med 2004 Apr; 25 (2): 113–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Knoppers BM. Biobanking: international norms. J Law Med Ethics 2005 Spr; 33 (1): 7–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weir RF, Olick RS. The stored tissue issue: biomedical research, ethics, and law in the era of genomic medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004: 145Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia. National statement on ethical conduct in research involving humans [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/e35syn.htm [Accessed 2008 Feb 20]
  20. 20.
    Essentially yours: the protection of human genetic information in Australia [online]. Available from URL: http://www.alrc.gov.au/inquiries/title/alrc96/in-dex.htm [Accessed 2008 Feb 20]
  21. 21.
    Gassner UM. Legal aspects of tissue banking. Pathobiology 2007; 74 (4): 270–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rothstein MA. The role of IRBs in research involving commercial biobanks. J Law Med Ethics 2002 Spr; 30 (1): 105–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Winickoff DE, Winickoff RN. The charitable trust as a model for genomic biobanks. N Engl J Med 2003 Sep 18; 349 (12): 1180–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Research involving human biological materials: issues and policy guidance. Rockville (MD): 1999 Aug [online]. Available from URL: http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac/pubs.html [Accessed 2007 Feb 20]Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gibbs JN. State regulation of pharmaceutical clinical trials. Food Drug Law J 2004; 59 (2): 265–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Morreim EH. Litigation in clinical research: malpractice doctrines versus research realities. J Law Med Ethics 2004 Fall; 32 (3): 474–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Human Research Protection. Guidance on research involving coded private information or biological specimens. 2004 Aug [online]. Available from URL: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/cdebiol.pdf [Accessed 2007 Feb 20]
  28. 28.
    Clayton EW. So what are we going to do about research using clinical information and samples? IRB 2004 Nov/Dec; 26 (6): 14–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Clayton EW. Patients and biobanks. Villanova Law Rev 2006; 51 (4): 793–802Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Evans BJ, Meslin EM. Encouraging translational research through harmonization of FDA and Common Rule informed consent requirements for research with banked specimens. J Leg Med 2006 Jun; 27 (2): 119–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health and Center for Biologic Evaluation and Research. Guidance for sponsors, institutional review boards, clinical investigators and FDA staff: guidance on informed consent for in vitro diagnostic device studies using leftover human specimens that are not individually identified. Fed Reg 2006 Apr 25; 71 (79): 23924–5 [online]. Available from URL: http://crpac.od.nih.gov/FinalFDAGuidanceonICforIVDDeviceStudieswithLeftoverSpecimensthatAreNotIndividuallyIdentifiable.pdf [Accessed 2007 Feb 20]Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Deschênes M, Sallée C. Accountability in population biobanking: comparative approaches. J Law Med Ethics 2005 Spr; 33 (1): 40–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McHale J, Habiba M, Dixon-Woods M, et al. Consent for childhood cancer tissue banking in the UK: the effect of the Human Tissue Act of 2004. Lancet Oncol 2007 Mar; 8 (3): 266–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sade RM. Research on stored biological samples is still research. Arch Intern Med 2002 Jul 8; 162 (13): 1439–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Prime W, Sobel ME, Herrington CS. Utilization of human tissue in breast cancer research. Breast Cancer Res 2000 Apr; 2 (4): 237–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Liddell K, Hall A. Beyond Bristol and Alder Hey: the future regulation of human tissue. Med Law Rev 2005 Sum; 13: 170–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Najmabadi H, Neishabury M, Sahebjam F, et al. The Iranian Human Mutation Gene Bank: a data and sample resource for worldwide collaborative genetics research. Hum Mutat 2003 Feb; 21 (2): 146–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Merz JF, Leonard DGB, Miller ER. IRB review and consent in human tissue research. Science 1999 Mar 12; 283: 1647–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    White MT, Gamm J. Informed consent for research on stored blood and tissue samples: a survey of institutional review board practices. Account Res 2002 Jan; 9 (1): 1–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Strouse DS. Informed consent to genetic research on banked human tissue. Jurimetrics J 2005 Win; 45: 135–52Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Furness P. Consent to using human tissue. BMJ 2003 Oct 4; 327: 759–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cassell J, Young A. Why we should not seek individual informed consent for participation in health services research. J Med Ethics 2002 Oct; 28 (5): 313–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Greely HT. Breaking the stalemate: a prospective regulatory framework for unforeseen research uses of human tissue samples and health information. Wake Forest Law Rev 1999 Fall; 34 (3): 737–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Caulfield T. Tissue banking, patient rights, and confidentiality: tensions in law and policy. Med Law 2004; 23 (1): 39–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Malinowski MJ. Technology transfer in biobanking: credits, debits, and population health futures. J Law Med Ethics 2005 Spr; 33 (1): 54–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Clayton EW. Informed consent and biobanks. J Law Med Ethics 2005 Spr; 33 (1): 15–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Volk Jr MD, McAuliffe CM, Mowzoon M. Genebank management: a review of salient ethical, legal, and social issues. Jurimetrics J 2005 Win; 45 (2): 205–23Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Furness PN. The Human Tissue Act: reassurance for relatives, at a price. BMJ 2006 Sep 9; 333: 512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Effective implementation of the Human Tissue Act [editorial]. Lancet 2006 Sep 9; 368: 891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ironside J. Effective implementation of the Human Tissue Act [letter]. Lancet 2006 Nov 11; 368: 1648–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Korobkin R. Autonomy and informed consent in nontherapeutic biomedical research. UCLA Law Rev 2007 Feb; 54: 605–30Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    US Department of Health & Human Services. OCR privacy brief: summary of the HIPAA privacy rule [online]. Available from URL: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacysummary.pdf [Accessed 2008 Feb 20]
  53. 53.
    US Department of Health and Human Services. Research repositories, databases, and the HIPAA privacy rule. Posted 2004 Jan 12 [online]. Available from URL: http://privacyruleandresearch.nih.gov/research_repositories.asp [Accessed 2008 Feb 20]
  54. 54.
    Allen MD. Commercial tissue repositories: HIPAA raises sponsor’s fears. IRB 2004 Sep/Oct; 26 (5): 9–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Palmer LI. Should liability play a role in social control of biobanks? J Law Med Ethics 2005 Spr; 33 (1): 70–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Safeguards in the use of DNA databanks in genomic research. In: Code of medical ethics: current opinions with annotations. Chicago (IL): American Medical Association, 2007Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wiwanitkit V. Ethical concerns on the use of laboratory waste. J Med Assoc Thai 2007 Jun; 90 (6): 1259–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Nilstun T, Hermerén G. Human tissue samples and ethics. Med Health Care Philos 2006 Mar; 9 (1): 81–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, et al. Perceptions of potential donors in the Swedish public towards information and consent procedures in relation to use of human tissue samples in biobanks: a population-based study. Scand J Public Health 2007; 35 (2): 148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, et al. Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks: what do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think? Eur J Public Health 2006 Aug; 16 (4): 433–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kaphingst KA, Janoff JM, Harris LN, et al. Views of female breast cancer patients who donated biologic samples regarding storage and use of samples for genetic research. Clin Genet 2006 May; 69 (5): 393–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Andrews L. Who owns your body? A patient’s perspective on Washington University v. Catalona. J Law Med Ethics 2006 Sum; 34 (2): 398–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Greenberg v. Miami Children’s Hosp. Research Inst., Inc., 264 F. Supp.2d 1064 (S.D. Fla. 2003)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Moore v. Regents of the Univ. Of Cal., 793 P.2d 479 (Cal. 1990)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Gitter DM. Ownership of human tissue: a proposal for federal recognition of human research participants’ property rights in their biological material. WA Lee Law Rev 2004 Win; 61 (1): 257–345Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Charo RA. Body of research: ownership and use of human tissue. N Engl J Med 2006 Oct 12; 355 (15): 1517–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Washington University v. Catalona, 490 F.3d 667, 2007 WL 1758268 (C.A. 8)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Gamber G. Who owns my donated tissue? The public’s prostate inflammation: a case note on Washington University v. Catalona. St Louis U Pub L Rev 2007; 26: 357–87Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Glantz L, Roche P, Annas GJ. Rules for donations to tissue banks: what next? N Engl J Med 2008 Jan 17; 358 (3): 298–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Oberdorfer KLJ. The lessons of Greenberg: informed consent and the protection of tissue sources’ research interests. Georgetown Law J 2004 Nov; 93 (1): 365–94Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    71.-American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Commercial use of human tissue. In: Code of medical ethics: current opinions with annotations. Chicago (IL): American Medical Association, 2007Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Asai A, Ohnishi M, Nishigaki E, et al. Attitudes of the Japanese public and doctors towards use of archived information and samples without informed consent: Preliminary findings based on focus group interviews. BMC Med Ethics 2002 Jan 2; 3: 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southern Illinois University School of Law and School of MedicineCarbondaleUSA

Personalised recommendations