Applied Health Economics and Health Policy

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 217–230 | Cite as

Does extending health insurance coverage to the uninsured improve population health outcomes?

Original Research Article

Abstract

Background

An ongoing debate exists about whether the US should adopt a universal health insurance programme. Much of the debate has focused on programme implementation and cost, with relatively little attention to benefits for social welfare.

Objective

To estimate the effect on US population health outcomes, measured by mortality, of extending private health insurance to the uninsured, and to obtain a rough estimate of the aggregate economic benefits of extending insurance coverage to the uninsured.

Method

We use state-level panel data for all 50 states for the period 1990–2000 to estimate a health insurance augmented, aggregate health production function for the US. An instrumental variables fixed-effects estimator is used to account for confounding variables and reverse causation from health status to insurance coverage. Several observed factors, such as income, education, unemployment, cigarette and alcohol consumption and population demographic characteristics are included to control for potential confounding variables that vary across both states and time.

Results

The results indicate a negative relationship between private insurance and mortality, thus suggesting that extending insurance to the uninsured population would result in an improvement in population health outcomes. The estimate of the marginal effect of insurance coverage indicates that a 10% increase in the population-insured rate of a state reduces mortality by 1.69–1.92%. Using data for the year 2003, we calculate that extending private insurance coverage to the entire uninsured population in the US would save over 75 000 lives annually and may yield annual net benefits to the nation in excess of $US400 billion.

Conclusion

This analysis suggests that extending health insurance coverage through the private market to the 46 million Americans without health insurance may well produce large social economic benefits for the nation as a whole.

Supplementary material

40258_2012_BF03256135_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (110 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 113 KB.

References

  1. 1.
    Hadley J, Holahan J. Covering the uninsured: how much would it cost? Health Aff 2003; Web Exclusive, W3–251Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    US Census Bureau. Current population survey, 1990–2000: annual social and economic supplements [online]. Available from URL: http://www.census.gov [Accessed 2006 Feb 21]
  3. 3.
    Henderson J. Health economics and policy. Florence (KY): South-Western Educational Publishing, 2005Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ruhm C. Are recessions good for your health? Q J Econ 2000; 115(2): 617–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Auster R, Leveson I, Sarachek D. The production of health, an exploratory study. J Hum Resour 1969; 4: 411–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thornton J. Estimating a health production function for the US: some new evidence. Appl Econ 2002; 34: 59–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weissman J, Stern R, Fielding S, et al. Delayed access to health care: risk factors, reasons, and consequences. Ann Int Med 1991; 114(4): 325–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freeman H, Aiken L, Blendon R, et al. Uninsured working-age adults: characteristics and consequences. Health Serv Res 1990; 24(6): 811–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mort E, Edwards D, Emmons D, et al. Physician response to patient insurance status in ambulatory care clinical decision making: implications for quality of care. Med Care 1996; 34(8): 783–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Comer J, Mueller K, Blumenau J. Losing and acquiring health insurance: consequences for health care. J Health Soc Policy 2000; 11(3): 1–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cunningham P. Employer-sponsored coverage: the role of public programs and implications for access to care. Med Care Res Rev 2002; 59(1): 79–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marquis M, Long S. The uninsured access gap: narrowing the estimates. Inquiry 1994; 31: 405–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Newhouse JP. Free for all? Lessons from the Rand health insurance experiment. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1993Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Burstin H, Lipsitz S, Brennan T. Socioeconomic status and risk for substandard medical care. J Am Med Assoc 1992; 268(17): 2383–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wennberg J, Freeman J, Shelton R, et al. Hospital use and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries in Boston and New Haven. N Eng J Med 1989; 321: 1168–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fisher EJ, Wennberg J, Strukel T, et al. Hospital readmission rates for cohorts of Medicare beneficiaries in Boston and New Haven. N Eng J Med 1994; 15: 989–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fisher E, Wennberg J, Stukel T, et al. Associations among hospital capacity, utilization, and mortality of US Medicare beneficiaries, controlling for sociodemographic factors. Health Serv Res 2000; 34(6): 1351–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fisher E, Wennberg D, Stukel TD, et al. The implications of regional variations in medicare spending: part 2. Health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Ann Int Med 2003; 138(4): 288–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hadley J. More medical care better health? An economic analysis of mortality rates. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press, 1982Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lichtenberg F. Sources of US longevity increase, 1960-1997 [NBER working paper 8755]. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research, 2002Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lichtenberg F. Sources of longevity increase, 1960-2001. Q Rev Econ Finance 2004; 44(3): 369–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cutler D, McClellan M, Newhouse J. The costs and benefits of intensive treatment for cardiovascular disease. In: Triplett J, editor. Measuring the prices of medical treatments. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999: 34–71Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cutler D, McClellan M. Is technological change worth it? Health Aff 2001; 20(5): 11–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cutler D, Kadiyala S. The return to biomedical research: treatment and behavioral effects. In: Murphy K, Topel R, editors. Measuring the gains from medical research. Chicago (IL): The University of Chicago Press, 2003; 110–62Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sorlie P, Johnson N, Backlund ED, et al. Mortality in the uninsured compared with that in persons with the public and private health insurance. Arch Int Med 1994; 154(21): 2409–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Franks P, Clancy C, Gold M. Health insurance and mortality: evidence from a national cohort. JAMA 1993; 270(6): 737–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hadley J. Sicker and poorer: the consequences of being uninsured. A review of the research on the relationship between health insurance, medical care use, health, work, and income. Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, 2002 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.kff.org [Accessed 2006 Feb 15]
  28. 28.
    Levy H, Meltzer D. What do we really know about whether health insurance affects health? In: McLaughlin C, editor. Health policy and the uninsured: setting the agenda. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press, 2004Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lurie N, Ward N, Shapiro M, et al. Termination from Medi-Cal: does it affect health? N Eng J Med 1984; 311(7): 480–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fihn S, Wicher J. Withdrawing routine outpatient medical services: effects on access and health. J Gen Int Med 1988; Jul-Aug: 356–62Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Haas J, Udvarhelyi S, Epstein A. The effect of providing health coverage to poor uninsured pregnant women in Massachusetts. JAMA 1993; 269: 87–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Currie J, Gruber J. Health insurance eligibility, utilization of medical care and child health. Q J Econ 1996; CXI: 431–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Currie J, Gruber J. Saving babies: the efficacy and cost of percent changes in the Medicaid eligibility of pregnant women. J Polit Econ 1996; 104(6): 1263–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lichtenberg F. The effects of Medicare on health care utilization and outcomes. Forum Health Econ Policy 2002; 5(1): 1028Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Perry C, Rosen H. The self-employed are less likely to have health insurance than wage earners: so what? [NBER working paper 8316]. Cambridge (MA): NBER, 2001Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Goldman D, Bhattacharya D, McCaffrey D, et al. The effect of insurance on mortality in an HIV+ population in care. J Am Stat Assoc 2001; 96(455): 883–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ackerman F, Heinzerling L. If it exists, it’s getting bigger: revising the value of a statistical life [working paper no. 01-06]. Medford (MA): Global Development and Environment Institute, 2001Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsEastern Michigan UniversityYpsilantiUSA

Personalised recommendations