Households’ willingness to pay for a motorcycle helmet in Hanoi, Vietnam

  • Khanh H. Pham
  • Quynh X. Le Thi
  • Dennis J. Petrie
  • Jon Adams
  • Christopher M. Doran
Original Research Article

Abstract

Background

Injuries caused by both non-use of and substandard helmets in motorcycle accidents place a substantial cost on both the Vietnamese government and on victims and their families who are unfortunate enough to experience such an event.

Objective

To estimate Vietnamese households’ willingness to pay (WTP) for a standard motorcycle helmet and to determine factors that affect the households’ decision regarding the price at which they would purchase a motorcycle helmet.

Method

A contingent valuation survey was administered to 420 households in two urban districts and one suburban district of Hanoi from January 2007 to February 2007. Both discrete-choice format and open-ended questions were used to examine households’ WTP for a motorcycle helmet. Descriptive analysis and multivariate analysis were used to estimate possible predictors of households’ WTP.

Result

A total of 414 households agreed to participate in the study, giving a response rate of 98%. Eighty-seven percent of respondents owned a motorcycle helmet. Sixty-two percent of respondents agreed to purchase a helmet at the market priceofVietnameseDong(VND)150 000 ($US9.38) [year 2007 values]. Households’ WTP varied from VND81635 to VND289674 ($US5.1-18.1), with a mean of VND163 794 ($US10.24) and a median of VND161 718 ($US10.11). It was estimated that if the government subsidizes VND61043 ($US3.82) for a helmet, 99% of the study population are willing to pay the additional cost for a standard helmet. Those households with a higher income and where the respondents were aged 40–55 years were more likely to purchase a helmet than those with a lower income and those of other ages.

Conclusion

Respondents were prepared to pay a higher price than the market price of a standard helmet. To improve the quality of helmets in Vietnam, it is recommended that the government subsidize a helmet programme in conjunction with other programmes (such as education and strict enforcement policies) in order to increase the ownership of quality helmets in Vietnam and thereby reduce the severity of motorcycle road traffic injuries.

References

  1. 1.
    Jacobs G, Aeron-Thomas A, Astrop A. Estimating global road fatalities. Crowthorne: Transport Research Laboratory, 2000Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nguyen TT. Road traffic accidents in Vietnam 2001-2005. The 1st National Scientific Conference on Injury Prevention; 2006 Nov 4–6; HanoiGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Traffic Safety Committee. Report on the situation of traffic safety and order in 2007. Hanoi: NTSC, 2008Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Health Organization. World report on road traffic injury prevention. Geneva: WHO, 2004Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    World Health Organization. Helmets: a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners. Geneva: WHO, 2006Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Norton R, Hyder AA, Bishai D, et al. Unintentional injuries. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, et al., editors. Disease control priorities in developing countries. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: IBRD/The World Bank, 2006: 591–603Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu B, Ivers R, Norton R, et al. Helmets for preventing injury in motorcycle riders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (1): CD004333Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Outllet JV, Kasantikul V. Motorcycle helmet effect on a percrash basis in Thailand and the United States. Traffic Injury Prev 2006; 7: 49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ming-Che T, Hemenway D. Effect ofthe mandatory helmet law in Taiwan. Injury Prev 1999; 5: 290–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dribben M. Vietnam shows effect of motorcycle helmets: injuries drop by up to 30% after their use becomes mandatory. Philadelphia Inquirer 2008 Jun 28 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.phiUy.com/inquirer/health_science/daily/20080628_Vietnam_shows_effect_of_motorcycle_helmets.html [Accessed 2008 Oct 15]Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hung DV, Stevenson MR, Ivers RQ. Prevalence of helmet use among motorcycle riders in Vietnam. Injury Prev 2006; 12: 409–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nguyen TT. Study on motorcycle helmet situation in Vietnam: investigating into motorcyclists behavior and attitude towards helmet wearing. Vietnam Helmet Workshop; 2006 Dec 12; HanoiGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nearly 90% of motorbike riders wear helmets incorrectly. In: Viet Nam News 2008 Mar 1 [online]. Available from URL: http://english.vietnamnet.vn/social/2008/01/762488/ [Accessed 2008 Oct 29]
  14. 14.
    Hung DV, Stevenson MR, Ivers RQ. Quality, ownership, purchase price and affordability for helmets in Vietnam. Traffic Injury Prev 2008; 9(2): 138–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bayoumi AH. The measurement of contingent valuation for health economics. Pharmacoeconomics 2004; 22(11): 691–700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith R, Olsen JA, Harris A, et al. A review of methodological issues in the conduct of WTP studies in health care II: administration of a CV survey [working paper 85]. Monash (VIC): Monash University, 1999Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PR, et al. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation [online]. Available from URL: http://www.darrp.noaa.gov/library/pdf/cvblue.pdf [Accessed 2008 Oct 29]

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Khanh H. Pham
    • 1
  • Quynh X. Le Thi
    • 1
  • Dennis J. Petrie
    • 2
  • Jon Adams
    • 1
  • Christopher M. Doran
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Population HealthUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Economic StudiesUniversity of DundeeDundeeScotland
  3. 3.National Drug and Alcohol Research CentreUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations