Regarding the ongoing efforts to reduce CO2 emissions of internal combustion engines, the potential friction benefits of toothed-belt drives become more important. In the course of the present study — which has been carried out by FEV on behalf of the belt drive system suppliers Contitech, Dayco and Gates — differences between chain and toothed-belt drives, with respect to friction, as well as noise-relevant excitations were quantified based on test bench investigations, also, the impact on fuel consumption and NVH was evaluated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Schulte, H.: Zahnriemen, Entwicklungsmeilensteine und Innovationen. In: Motortechnische Zeitschrift MTZ (66) 2005 Nr. 12
Körfer, W.; Lacy, F.: Zahnriementriebe und ihre Vorteile hinsichtlich Reibverlusten und Akustik. In: Motortechnische Zeitschrift MTZ (67) 2006 Nr. 7/8
Kyoul, OH.; Plaumann, M.; Romanick, J.; Farmer, I.; Aimone, M.; Barnaby, D.: Performance Comparison between Chain and Belt Cam-Drive Systems. SAE Paper 2001-01-0365, SAE 2001 World Congress Detroit, Michigan, March 5–8, 2001
About this article
Cite this article
Tiemann, C., Steffens, C., Wedowski, S. et al. Belt versus chain. MTZ Worldw 70, 30–35 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03226951
- Engine Speed
- Chain Drive
- Timing Drive
- Belt Drive
- Consumption Benefit