School self-evaluation in the Netherlands: Development of the ZEBO-instrumentation

Cremers-van Wees, L.M.C.M., et al. 1996a.Instrumenten voor zelfevaluatie: inventarisatie en beschrijving [Instruments for school self-evaluation: inventory and description]. Enschede, Netherlands, Universiteit Twente, OCTO.Google Scholar

——. 1996b.Instrumenten voor zelfevaluatie: beschrijving van 31 instrumenten [Instruments for school self-evaluation: description of 31 instruments]. Enschede, Netherlands, Universiteit Twente, OCTO.Google Scholar

Engelen, R., et al. 1997.Schoolzelfevaluatie in het basisonderwijs: interimrapportage van het gezamenlijke project van Cito, SLO en OCTO (periode maart 1995-december 1996) [School self-evaluation in primary education: interim report of the collaborative project of Cito, SLO and OCTO (period March 1995-December 1996)]. Enschede, Netherlands, Universiteit Twente, OCTO.Google Scholar

Fullan, M. 1991.The new meaning of educational change. London, Cassell Educational Limited.Google Scholar

Hendriks, M.A. 2000.Kwaliteitszorg voortgetzet onderwijs: instrumenten en organisaties. [Quality assurance in secondary education: instruments and organizations]. Utrecht, Netherlands, VVO.Google Scholar

Hendriks, M.A.; Doolaard, S.; Bosker, R.J. 2001. Using school effectiveness as a knowledge base for self-evaluation in Dutch schools.In: Coe, R.; Visscher, J., eds.School improvement through performance feedback. Lisse, Netherlands, Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.Google Scholar

Ministry of Education, Culture & Sciences. 1995.De school als lerende organisatie: ktualiteitsbeleid op scholen voor primair en voortgezet onderwijs [The school as a learning orga-nization: quality policy in schools for primary and secondary education]. The Hague, SDU, DOP.Google Scholar

-- 1999.Diversity and a guarantee. Proposals for the development of the supervision of education. The Hague.Google Scholar

Moelands, H.A.; Ouborg, M.J. 1995. School self-evaluation in primary education in the Netherlands. (Paper for the conference for Senior European Community Officials in Brussels.)Google Scholar

Moelands, H.A., et al. 2000.Zelfevaluatie basisonderwijs (ZEBO): naar een geïntegreerd instrumentarium. Eindrapport van het gezamenlijke project van Cito, OCTO en SLO [Self-evaluation in primary education. Final report of the collaborative project of Cito, SLO and OCTO]. Enschede, Netherlands, Universiteit Twente, OCTO.Google Scholar

Scheerens, J. 1995.Towards an integrated instrumentation of school self-evaluation descrip-tion of the Cito, SLO, OCTO-joint project on school self evaluation in primary education. (Internal paper.)Google Scholar

Scheerens, J.; Bosker, R.J. 1997.The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford, Elsevier Science/Pergamon.Google Scholar

Solomon, J., ed. 1998. Trends in the evaluation of education systems school (self-) evaluation and decentralization. (European Workshop-Papers, Reports, Discussion Outcomes. Athens. Hellenic Ministry of National Education and Religious Affairs, Pedagogical Institute Department of Evaluation and European Commission, D.G. XXII, Education, Training and Youth, Directorate A Unit 1.)Google Scholar

VVO. 1998a. Met gefaseerde aanpak. Invoering schoolplan is geen moordklus [Approach in phases. Implementating school plan no tough job].VVO-magazine (Utrecht, Netherlands), no. 3, p. 19–20.Google Scholar

--. 1998b. Planlast van scholen. Nieuwe regels fungeren als knellend confectiepak [Planning burden of schools: new rules act as tight ready-to-wear suit].VVO-magazine (Utrecht, Netherlands), no. 3, p. 21–22.Google Scholar

WVO. 1998.Wet op het voortgezet onderwijs. Tekst & toelichting [Law on secondary education. Text and explanation]. Elsevier bedrijfsinformatie bv. http://www.ebi.nl/uk/index.php3Google Scholar