Advertisement

The Australian Educational Researcher

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 129–146 | Cite as

Feyerabend revisited: Epistemological anarchy and disciplined eclecticism in educational research

  • David R Geelan
Article

Abstract

Discussion between the adherents of various orientations within educational research has often generated more heat than light. A pervasive analogy drawn in these discussions has been between the philosophy of science and educational research. In this paper I explore the value of several influential perspectives within twentieth century philosophy of science as means of understanding what researchers in education do, and why. I suggest that Paul Feyerabend’s ‘anything goes’ epistemological perspective has much to offer in supporting rich educational research. If positivist standards of validity and reliability are no longer considered appropriate for some forms of educational research, however, new standards for justification and representation, explicitly stated within the research, will be necessary.

Keywords

Educational Research Educational Researcher Scientific Revolution Discipline Inquiry Epistemological Perspective 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bauersfeld, Heinrich (1988) Interaction, construction and knowledge: alternative perspectives for mathematics education, in Douglas A. Grouws, Thomas J. Cooney & Douglas Jones, (eds.),Perspectives on Research on Effective Mathematics Teaching, Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Reston, VA.Google Scholar
  2. Chalmers, Alan F. (1982)What is this Thing Called Science? (2nd ed.). University of Queensland Press, St Lucia, QLD.Google Scholar
  3. Corbett, Dick & Bruce Wilson (1995) Make a difference with, not for, students.Educational Researcher 24(5), pp. 12–17.Google Scholar
  4. Cronbach, Lee and Patrick Suppes (1969)Research for Tomorrow’s Schools: Disciplined Inquiry in Education. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Denzin, Norman K. (1988) Triangulation. In John P. Keeves, ed.,Educational Research, Methodology and Measurement: An International Handbook (pp. 511–513). Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. Denzin, Norman K. & Lincoln, Yvonna S. (1994)Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Fals Borda, Orlando (1979) Investigating reality in order to transform it: The Colombian experience. In Stephen Kemmis & Robin McTaggart, eds.,The Action Research Reader. Deakin University, Geelong.Google Scholar
  8. Feyerabend, Paul K. and Imre Lakatos (1999a)For and Against Method. Edited and with an introduction by Matteo Motterlini. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. Feyerabend, Paul K. (1999b)Conquest of Abundance: A Tale of Abstraction versus the Richness of Being. Edited by Bert Terpstra. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Feyerabend, Paul K. (1988)Against Method: Outline of An Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, 2 nd ed., Verso, London.Google Scholar
  11. Feyerabend, Paul K. (1987)Farewell to Reason. Verso, London.Google Scholar
  12. Feyerabend, Paul K. (1978)Science in A Free Society. New Left Books, London.Google Scholar
  13. Feyerabend, Paul K. (1975)Against Method: Outline of An Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, New Left Books, London.Google Scholar
  14. Feyerabend, Paul K. (1974) How to be a good empiricist — A plea for tolerance in matters epistemological. In P.H. Nidditch, ed.,The Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Friere, Paulo (1982) Creating alternative research methods: Learning to do it by doing it. In Stephen Kemmis & Robin McTaggart, eds.,The Action Research Reader. Deakin University, Geelong.Google Scholar
  16. Friere, Paulo (1971)Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Herder and Herder, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Gage, Nathaniel L. (1989) The paradigm wars and their aftermath: a “historical” sketch of research on teaching since 1989.Educational Researcher 18(7), 4–10.Google Scholar
  18. Gage, Nathaniel L. (1996) Confronting counsels of despair for the behavioural sciences.Educational Researcher 25(3), pp. 5–15, 22.Google Scholar
  19. Gage, Nathaniel L. (1963)Handbook of Research on Teaching: A Project of the American Educational Research Association. Rand McNally, Chicago.Google Scholar
  20. Geertz, Clifford (1973) Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In Clifford Geertz,The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Gergen, Kenneth J. (1994)Toward Transformation of Social Knowledge (2nd ed.). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  22. Guba, Egon, & Yvonna Lincoln (1989)Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  23. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1970)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  24. Lakatos, Imre (1970) ‘Falsifications and the methodology of scientific research programs’, in Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave, eds.,Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  25. Paulston, Rolland G. (1990) From paradigm wars to disputatious community.Comparative Education Review 34(3), 395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Polkinghorne, Donald E. (1992) Postmodern epistemology of practice. In Steniar Kvale, ed.,Psychology and Postmodernism. Sage, London.Google Scholar
  27. Popper, Karl R. (1968)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
  28. Popper, Karl R. (1965)Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (2nd ed.). Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Shulman, Lee S. (1986) Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In Merlin C. Wittrock, ed.,Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed.). (pp. 3–36). Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Stenhouse, David (1986) Conceptual change in science education: paradigms and language games,Science Education 70(4), 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Maanen, John (1988)Tales of the Field: on Writing Ethnography. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Association for Research in Education 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • David R Geelan
    • 1
  1. 1.Edith Cowan UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations