Education policy, welfare and the language of the market
Article
- 96 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Keywords
Welfare State Government Printer Education Policy National Curriculum Compulsory Education
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Boston, J. (1991) The theoretical underpinnings of public sector restructuring in New Zealand, in J. Boston, J. Martin, J. Pallot and P. Walsh eds,Reshaping the State, Oxford University Press, Auckland.Google Scholar
- Boston, J., Levine, S., Levine, E. and Roberts, N. (1996)New Zealand Under MMP: A New Politics?, Auckland University Press & Bridget Williams Books, Auckland.Google Scholar
- Capper, P. (1992) Curriculum 1991,New Zealand Annual Review of Education, vol. 1, pp. 15–27.Google Scholar
- Crocombe, G. T., Enright, M. and Porter, M. (1991)Upgrading New Zealand’s Competitive Advantage, Oxford University Press, Auckland.Google Scholar
- Delcourt, J. (1985) Social policy: Crisis or mutation, in R. Girod, P. de Laubier, A. Gladstone eds,Social Policy in Western Europe and USA: 1950–80. An Assessment, MacMillan, London.Google Scholar
- Department of Education (1988)Administering for Excellence: Effective Administration in Education, (The Picot Report), Government Printer, Wellington.Google Scholar
- Department of Education (1988)Report of the Working Group on Post-Compulsory Education and Training, (The Hawke Report), Government Printer, Wellington.Google Scholar
- Department of Education (1988)Tomorrow’s Schools: The Reform of Educational Administration in New Zealand, Government Printer, Wellington.Google Scholar
- Department of Education (1988, 1989)Learning for Life & Learning for Life Two, Government Printer, Wellington.Google Scholar
- Durie, M. (1988) Social policy perspectives, in J. Martin and J. Harper eds,Devolution and Accountability, GP Books, Wellington, pp. 37–45.Google Scholar
- Edwards, D. (1991) A study in conflict: Inside the porter project,New Zealand Listener and TV Times, September, vol. 23, pp. 39–42.Google Scholar
- Ferge, S. (1997) The changed welfare paradigm: the individualisation of the social,Social Policy and Administration, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 20–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Habermas, J. (1981) New social movements,Telos, vol. 49, pp. 33–37.Google Scholar
- Illich, I. (1971)Deschooling Society, Calder & Boyars, London.Google Scholar
- Joppke, C. (1987) The crisis of the welfare state, collective consumption, and the rise of new social actors,Berkeley Journal of Sociology, vol. XXXII, pp. 237–260.Google Scholar
- Keat, R. and Abercrombie, N. (1991) (eds)Enterprise Culture, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
- Kelsey, J. (1993)Rolling Back the State: Privatisation of Power in Aotearoa/New Zealand, Bridget Williams Books, Wellington.Google Scholar
- Le Grand, J. (1982)The Strategy of Equality: Redistribution and the Social Services, Allen & Unwin, London & Boston.Google Scholar
- Marshall, J. (1992) Principles and the National Curriculum: Centralised Development, New Zealand Council for Teacher Education Conference, Auckland College of Education.Google Scholar
- Miller, R. (1997) (ed)New Zealand Politics in Transition, Oxford University Press, Auckland.Google Scholar
- Minister of Education, Lockwood Smith (1991)Education Policy: Investing in People, Our Greatest Asset, Government Printer, Wellington.Google Scholar
- Minister of Finance, Ruth Richardson (1991)Budget 1991, Government Printer, Wellington.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education (1993)The New Zealand Curriculum Framework, Learning Media, Wellington.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education (1991)The National Curriculum of New Zealand: A Discussion Document, Learning Media, Wellington.Google Scholar
- New Zealand Qualifications Authority (1991)Designing the Framework: A Discussion Document About Restructuring National Qualifications, NZQA, Wellington.Google Scholar
- O’Connor, J. (1973)The Fiscal Crisis of the State, St. Martin’s Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Offe, C. (1984) Some contradictions of the modern welfare state, in C. Offe,Contradictions of the Welfare State, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Peters, M. and Marshall, J. (1996)Individualism and Community: Education and Social Policy in the Postmodern Condition, Falmer Press, London.Google Scholar
- Peters, M. (1992) A critique of the Porter Report,Delta, vol. 46, May, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
- Peters, M. (1994) Educational reform and the politics of the curriculum in New Zealand, in M. O’Neill and D. Carter eds,International Perspectives on Educational Reform and Curriculum Implementation, Falmer Press, London.Google Scholar
- Peters, M. (1997) Neoliberalism, welfare dependency and the moral construction of poverty, New Zealand,New Zealand Journal of Sociology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
- Peters, M., Marshall, J. and Smith, G. (1991) The business roundtable and the privatisation of education: Individualism and the attack on Maori, in L. Gordon and J. Codd eds,Education Policy and the Changing Role of the State, Delta Studies in Education, Palmerston North, pp. 81–98.Google Scholar
- Philpott, B. (1991)Review of Upgrading New Zealand’s Competitive Advantage, New Zealand Economic Papers, 25, pp. 275–282.Google Scholar
- Scott, G. and Gorringe, P. (1989) Reform of the core public sector: The New Zealand experience,Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sexton, S. (1991)New Zealand Schools: An Evaluation Of Recent Reforms and Future Directions, Business Roundtable, Wellington.Google Scholar
- State Services Commission (1990)Briefing to the Incoming Government, Government Printer, Wellington.Google Scholar
- The Treasury (1984)Economic Management, Government Printer, Wellington.Google Scholar
- The Treasury (1987)Government Management: Brief to the Incoming Government, vols. I & II, Government Printer, Wellington.Google Scholar
- Upton, S. (1987)The Withering of the State, Oxford University Press, Auckland.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Australian Association for Research in Education 2000