Macromolecular Research

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 14–18 | Cite as

Grafting of glycidyl methacrylate upon coralline hydroxyapatite in conjugation with demineralized bone matrix using redox initiating system

  • R. Murugan
  • K. Panduranga Rao
Article

Abstract

Grafting of glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) upon coralline hydroxyapatite in conjugation with demineralized bone matrix (CHA-DBM) using equal molar ratio of potassium persulfate/sodium metabisulfite redox initiating system was investigated in aqueous medium. The optimum reaction condition was standardized by varying the concentrations of backbone, monomer, initiator, temperature and time. The results obtained imply that the percent grafting was found to increase initially and then decrease in most of the cases. The optimum temperature and time were found to be 50 δC and 180 min, respectively, to obtain higher grafting yield. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD)method were employed for the proof of grafting. The FT-IR spectrum of grafted CHA-DBM showed epoxy groups at 905 and 853 cm−1 and ester carbonyl group at 1731 cm−1 of poly(glycidyl methacrylate) (PGMA) in addition to the characteristic absorptions of CHA-DBM, which provides evidence of the grafting. The XRD results clearly indicated that the crystallographic structure of the grafted CHA-DBM has not changed due to the grafting reaction. Further, no phase transformation was detected by the XRD analysis, which suggests that the PGMA is grafted only on the surface of CHA-DBM backbone. The grafted CHA-DBM will have better functionality because of their surface modification and hence they may be more useful in coupling of therapeutic agents through epoxy groups apart from being used as osteogenic material.

Keywords

coralline hydroxyapatite DBM GMA grafting FT-IR 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    K. Ono, T. Yammamura, T. Nakammura, and T. Kokubo,Biomater.,11, 265 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    M. Jarcho,Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res.,157, 259 (1981).Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    K. De Groot,Biomater.,1, 47 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    C. Muller-Mai, C. Voigt, S. R. De Almeida Reis, H. Herbst, and U. M. Gross,J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.,7, 479 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    J. Glowaki and J. B. Mulliken,Clin. Plast. Surg.,12, 233 (1985).Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    S. Mizuno and J. Glowacki,Biomater.,17, 1819 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    M. R. Urist,Science,150, 893 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    T. K. Sampath and A. H. Reddi,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,80, 6591 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    T. Sato, M. Kavamura, K. Sato, and T. Miura,Clin. Orthop.,263, 254 (1991).Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    S. Kotani, T. Yammamura, T. Nakamura, T. Kitsugi, Y. Furita, K. Kawanable, and T. Kokubo,Clin. Orthop.,278, 226 (1992).Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    A. W. Eckert, D. Grobe, and U. Rothe,Biomater.,21, 441 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    R. Murugan and K. Panduranga Rao,J. Appl. Polym. Sci., (2002, under revision).Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    T. Sathian, T. P. Sastry, Y. L. Narayana, and G. R. Krishnan,Proceedings of XXV IULTCS Congress,CTO-4, 576 (1999).Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    K. Panduranga Rao,J. Biomat. Sci. Polym. Ed.,7, 623 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    M. Sivakumar, T. S. Sampathkumar, K. L. Shantha, and K. Panduranga Rao,Biomater.,17, 1709 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    S. Mizuno and J. Glowaki,Biomater.,17, 1819 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Y. Ikada, Y. Nishizaki, and I. Sakurada,J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed.,12, 1829 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    P. H. Von Hippel, Treatise on Collagen, G.N. Ramachandran, Ed., Academic Press, New York, 1967, Vol.1, pp 253.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Polymer Society of Korea and Springer 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Murugan
    • 1
  • K. Panduranga Rao
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomaterials LaboratoryCentral Leather Research InstituteChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations