Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift

, Volume 116, Issue 15–16, pp 536–541 | Cite as

Extracorporeal Shockwave treatment is effective in calcific tendonitis of the shoulder. A randomized controlled trial

  • Johannes Pleiner
  • Richard Crevenna
  • Herbert Langenberger
  • Mohammad Keilani
  • Martin Nuhr
  • Franz Kainberger
  • Michael Wolzt
  • Günther Wiesinger
  • Michael Quittan
Original Article

Summary

Background

Calcific tendonitis of the shoulder is often associated with chronic pain and impairment of function. Extracorporeal Shockwave therapy (ESWT) is considered to be a treatment option. We compared the effects of two different ESWT regimens.

Methods

43 patients (57 shoulders) with symptomatic calcific tendonitis of the shoulder for more than six months were included in a double-blinded study. Thirty-one shoulders were treated at the area of maximum pain with application of 2×2000 impulses of 0.28mJ/mm2 at an interval of two weeks (treatment group) and 26 shoulders with 2×2000 impulses of <0.07mJ/mm2 at an interval of two weeks (control group), without pretreatment analgesia. Shoulder function (Constant score) and pain (visual analogue scale, VAS) were assessed before treatment and at one week, three months and seven months after treatment. Shoulder X-rays were performed at the 3- and 7-month follow-up visits.

Results

Improvement in Constant score was significantly higher in the treatment group at all follow-up visits (p<0.05). Seven months post-treatment, calcifications dissolved completely in 19% of the treatment group and 8% of the control group, and a >50% reduction was observed in 19% and 8% respectively. With regard to reduction of pain, there was significant improvement in the treatment group compared with the control group at the 1-week follow-up (p<0.05). However, at the 3-month and 7-month visits, no significant between-group difference in pain could be detected.

Conclusion

As applied, ESWT with an energy flux density of 0.28mJ/mm2 led to a significantly greater improvement in shoulder function and a slightly higher, nonsignificant, rate of > 50% disintegration of calcific deposits compared with the control group. However, this did not result in reduction of pain.

Key words

Extracorporeal Shockwave therapy calcifications shoulder joint Visual Analogue Pain Scale Gärtner score 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Duplay S (1872) De la peri-arthrite scapulo-humerale et des raideurs de l’epaule qui en sont la consequence. Arch Gen Med 20: 513–542Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weiss W, Turk C, Brownstone E, Hruby W, Klose W, Kolbl C, et al (1989) Clinical relevance of extracorporeal Shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) in choledocholithiasis. Wien Klin Wochenschr 101: 629–631PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meiser G, Lexer G, Heinerman M, Zukriegel M, Kaindl H, Pimpl W, et al (1992) Extracorporeal shock wave treatment of calcium containing gallbladder calculi. Wien Klin Wochenschr 104: 451–455PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Valchanou VD, Michailov P (1991) High energy shock waves in the treatment of delayed and nonunion of fractures. Int Orthop 15: 181–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Loew M, Jurgowski W (1993) Initial experiences with extracorporeal Shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) in treatment of tendinosis calcarea of the shoulder. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 131: 470–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ogden JA, Toth-Kischkat A, Schultheiss R (2001) Principles of shock wave therapy. Clin Orthop 387: 8–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pleiner J, Imhof A, Quittan M (2002) Extracorporeal Shockwave therapy for diseases of bones and joints. Med Monatsschr Pharm 25: 236–240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rompe JD, Zoellner J, Nafe B (2001) Shock wave therapy versus conventional surgery in the treatment of calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 387: 72–82 or]9. International Society for Musculoskeletal Shockwave-therapy (ISMST) and European Society for Musculoskeletal Shockwave Therapy (ESMST):www.shockwavetherapy.org and www.ismst.com; special guidelines and recommendations available at www.ismst.com/quality_ standards.htmPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 10.
    Pan PJ, Chou CL, Chiou HJ, Ma HL, Lee HC, Chan RC (2003) Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for chronic calcific tendinitis of the shoulders: a functional and sonographic study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84: 988–993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 11.
    Gärtner J, Heyer A (1995) Calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Orthopäde 24: 284–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 12.
    Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 214: 160–164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 13.
    Erhart J, Heinz T, Schuster R, Greitbauer M, Vecsei V (2002) Stabilization of proximal humeral fractures with the intramedullary dynamic titanium helix wire. Wien Klin Wochenschr 114: 859–865PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 14.
    Böhm D (2002) Scores. In: Gohlke F, Hedtmann A (Hrsg) Schulter. Thieme, Stuttgart New York, S 103–104Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    Gerdesmeyer L, Wagenpfeil S, Haake M, Maier M, Loew M, Wortler K, et al (2003) Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of chronic calcifying tendonitis of the rotator cuff: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 290: 2573–2580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 16.
    Rompe JD, Burger R, Hopf C, Eysel P (1998) Shoulder function after extracorporal shock wave therapy for calcific tendinitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7: 505–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 17.
    Rompe JD, Rumler F, Hopf C, Nafe B, Heine J (1995) Extracorporal shock wave therapy for calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 321: 196–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 18.
    Cosentino R, De Stefano R, Selvi E, Frati E, Manca S, Frediani B, et al (2003) Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for chronic calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: single blind study. Ann Rheum Dis 62: 248–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 19.
    Ogden JA, Alvarez RG, Levitt R, Marlow M (2001) Shock wave therapy (Orthotripsy) in musculoskeletal disorders. Clin Orthop 387: 22–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 20.
    Ebenbichler GR, Erdogmus CB, Resch KL, Funovics MA, Kainberger F, Barisani G, et al (1999) Ultrasound therapy for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. N Engl J Med 340: 1533–1538PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 21.
    Crevenna R, Keilani M, Wiesinger G, Nicolakis P, Quittan M, Fialka-Moser V (2002) Calcific trochanteric bursitis: resolution of calcifications and clinical remission with non-invasive treatment. A case report. Wien Klin Wochenschr 114: 345–348PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 22.
    Haake M, Deike B, Thon A, Schmitt J (2002) Exact focusing of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for calcifying tendinopathy. Clin Orthop 397: 323–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 23.
    Speed CA, Richards C, Nichols D, Burnet S, Wies JT, Humphreys H, et al (2002) Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy for tendonitis of the rotator cuff. A double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84: 509–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 24.
    Maier M, Stabler A, Schmitz C, Lienemann A, Kohler S, Durr HR, et al (2001) On the impact of calcified deposits within the rotator cuff tendons in shoulders of patients with shoulder pain and dysfunction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121: 371–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 25.
    Schmitt J, Tosch A, Hunerkopf M, Haake M (2002) Extracorporeal Shockwave therapy (ESWT) as therapeutic option in supraspinatus tendon syndrome? One year results of a placebo controlled study. Orthopade 31: 652–657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 26.
    McKendry RJ, Uhthoff HK, Sarkar K, Hyslop PS (1982) Calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: prognostic value of clinical, histologic, and radiologic features in 57 surgically treated cases. J Rheumatol 9: 75–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 27.
    Ark JW, Flock TJ, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU (1992) Arthroscopic treatment of calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 8: 183–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 28.
    Maier M, Averbeck B, Milz S, Refior HJ, Schmitz C (2003) Substance P and prostaglandin E2 release after shock wave application to the rabbit femur. Clin Orthop 406: 237–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 29.
    Ohtori S, Inoue G, Mannoji C, Saisu T, Takahashi K, Mitsuhashi S, et al (2001) Shock wave application to rat skin induces degeneration and reinnervation of sensory nerve fibres. Neurosci Lett 315: 57–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 30.
    Takahashi N, Wada Y, Ohtori S, Saisu T, Moriya H (2003) Application of shock waves to rat skin decreases calcitonin gene—related peptide immunoreactivity in dorsal root ganglion neurons. Auton Neurosci 107: 81–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 31.
    Tomita Y, Shima A (1986) Mechanisms of impulsive pressure generation and damage pit formation by bubble collapse. J Fluid Mech 169: 535–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 32.
    Suhr D, Brummer F, Hulser DF (1991) Cavitation-generated free radicals during shock wave exposure: investigations with cell-free solutions and suspended cells. Ultrasound Med Biol 17: 761–768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 33.
    Forriol F, Solchaga L, Moreno JL, Canadell J (1994) The effect of Shockwaves on mature and healing cortical bone. Int Orthop 18: 325–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Pleiner
    • 1
    • 3
  • Richard Crevenna
    • 1
  • Herbert Langenberger
    • 2
  • Mohammad Keilani
    • 1
  • Martin Nuhr
    • 1
  • Franz Kainberger
    • 2
  • Michael Wolzt
    • 3
  • Günther Wiesinger
    • 1
  • Michael Quittan
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationUniversitätsklinik für Klinische Pharmakologie, Allgemeines Krankenhaus WienViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department of Radiology (Osteology)Austria
  3. 3.Department of Clinical PharmacologyMedical University of ViennaAustria
  4. 4.Kaiser Franz Josef SpitalViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations