The Australian Educational Researcher

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 77–91 | Cite as

The nature of pedagogic teacher-student interactions: A phenomenographic study

  • Denise Beutel


Globally, teaching has become more complex and more challenging over recent years, with new and increased demands being placed on teachers by students, their families, governments and wider society. Teachers work with more diverse communities in times characterised by volatility, uncertainty and moral ambiguity. Societal, political, economic and cultural shifts have transformed the contexts in which teachers work and have redefined the ways in which teachers interact with students. This qualitative study uses phenomenographic methods to explore the nature of pedagogic teacherstudent interactions. The data analysis reveals five qualitatively different ways in which teachers experience pedagogic engagements with students. The resultant categories of description ranged from information providing, with teachers viewed as transmitters of a body of knowledge through to mentoring in which teachers were perceived as significant others in the lives of students with their influence extending beyond the walls of the classroom and beyond the years of schooling. The paper concludes by arguing that if teachers are to prepare students for the challenges and opportunities in changing times, teacher education programs need to consider ways to facilitate the development of mentoring capacities in new teachers.


Pedagogic Interaction High Education Research Complex Category Australian Educational Researcher Mentor Category 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akerlind, G. S. (2002, November).Academic’s awareness of their own growth and development: Five dimensions of variation. Paper presented at the Symposium on Current Issues in Phenomenography, Canberra.Google Scholar
  2. Ashworth, P., & Lucas, U. (1998). What is the “World” of phenomenography?Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 415–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Booth, S. (1997). On phenomenography, learning and teaching.Higher Education Research and Development, 16(2), 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boulton-Lewis, G. M., Marton, F., Lewis, D. C., & Wilss, L. A. (2001). A longitudinal study of learning for a group of indigenous Australian university students: Dissonant conceptions and strategies.Higher Education, 47, 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowden, J. A. (2000). The nature of phenomenographic research. In J. A. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.),Phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Carrington, V. (2006).Rethinking Middle years: Early adolescents, schooling and digital culture. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  7. Darling, N., Hamilton, S. F., & Shaver, K. H. (2003). Relationships outside the family: Unrelated adults. In G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Eds.),Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 349–370). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. DeBolt, G. P. (1992).Teacher induction and mentoring: School-based collaborative programs. Albany, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  9. Education Queensland. (2002).A guide to productive pedagogies: Classroom reflection manual. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Government.Google Scholar
  10. Fraser. B. J., & Wahlberg, H. J. (2005). Research on teacher-student relationships and learning environments: Context, retrospect and prospect.International Journal of Educational Research, 43(1–2), 102–109.Google Scholar
  11. Fried, R. J. (2001).The passionate teacher: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students.Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(8), 811–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2000). Mentoring in the new millennium.Theory into Practice, 39(1), 50–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harris, L. R. (2008). A phenomenographic investigation of teacher conceptions of student engagement in learning.The Australian Educational Researcher 35(1), 57–79.Google Scholar
  15. Hasselgren, B., & Beach, D. (1997). Phenomenography: A “good for nothing brother” of phenomenology? Outline of an analysis.Higher Education Research and Development, 16(2), 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Killen, R. (2007).Effective teaching strategies: Lessons from research and practice (4th Ed.). South Melbourne, VIC.: Thomson Social Science Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lave, J. (1991). Situated learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds.),Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lawton, D., & Gordon, P. (1993).Dictionary of education. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
  19. Lingard, R., Ladwig, J., Luke, A., Mills, M., Hayes, D., & Gore, J. (2001).The Queensland school reform longitudinal study: Final report (Research report). Brisbane: Education Queensland.Google Scholar
  20. Lingard, R., Martino, W., Mills, M., & Bahr, M. (2002).Addressing the educational needs of boys: Strategies for schools and teachers (Research report). Canberra: Department of Science, Education and Training.Google Scholar
  21. Lingard, R., Mills, M., & Hayes, D. (2000). Teachers, school reform and social justice: Challenging research and practice.Australian Educational Researcher, 27(3), 99–115.Google Scholar
  22. Lovat, T. J., & MacKenzie, C. (2003).The role of the ‘teacher’: Coming of age? [Discussion paper]. Bundoora, Australia: The Australian Council of Deans of Education Incorporated.Google Scholar
  23. Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality.Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49.Google Scholar
  24. Marton, F. (1988). Phenomenography: Exploring different conceptions of reality. In D. Fetterman (Ed.),Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education: The silent revolution (pp. 176–208). NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
  25. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997).Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  26. Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (1999, August).Two faces of variation. Paper presented at the 8th European conference for learning and instruction, Goteborg University, Goteborg, Sweden.Google Scholar
  27. Metcalfe, A. & Game, A. (2008). The teacher’s enthusiasm.Australian Educational Researcher, 33(3), 91–106.Google Scholar
  28. Newman, F. J., & Associates. (1996).Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2005).Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  30. Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community.Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323–367.Google Scholar
  31. Oswald, M., Johnson, B., & Howard, S. (2003). Quantifying and evaluating resiliencepromoting factors: Teachers’ beliefs and perceived roles.Research in Education, 70, 50–64.Google Scholar
  32. Ottewill, R. M. (2003). What’s wrong with instrumental learning? The case of business and management.Education and Training, 45(4/5), 189–196.Google Scholar
  33. Poulson, J., & Fouts, G. (2001). Facilitating academic achievement through affect attunement in the classroom.Journal of Educational Research, 94(3), 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Prosser, M. (2000). Using phenomenographic research methodology in the context of research in teaching and learning. In J. A. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.),Phenomenography (pp. 34–47). Melbourne, Australia: RMIT University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Taylor, P. (1994). A phenomenographic study of academics’ conceptions of science learning and teaching.Learning and Instruction, 4, 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Richardson, J. T. E. (1999). The concept and methods of phenomenographic research.Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 53–82.Google Scholar
  37. Rogoff, B., Turkanis, C., & Bartlett, L. (Eds.). (2001).Learning together: Children and adults in a school community. NY: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rowe, K. J. (2000, August).“Problems” in the education of boys and exploring “real” effects from evidence-based research: Useful findings in teaching and learning for boys and girls. Paper presented at the Teaching Boys Developing Fine Men Conference, Carlton Crest Hotel, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  39. Rowe, K. J., & Rowe, K. S. (2000).Inquiry into the education of boys. [Submission to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Employment, Education and Workplace relations]. Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  40. Samuelowicz, J. (1999). Academics’ educational beliefs and teaching practices. Unpublished PhD thesis, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  41. Sandberg, J. (2000). Understanding human competence at work: An interpretive approach.Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Svensson, L. (1997). Theoretical foundations of phenomenography.Higher Education Research and Development, 16(2), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Trepanier-Street, M. (2004/2005). Teachers: Mentors of children.Childhood Education, 81(2), 66–69.Google Scholar
  44. Trigwell, K. (2000). A phenomenographic interview on phenomenography. In J. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.),Phenomenography (pp. 47–61). Melbourne, Australia: RMIT University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Wentzel, K. R. (1997). Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring.Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 411–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wentzel, K. R. (2002). Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence.Child Development, 73(1), 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Association for Research in Education 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denise Beutel
    • 1
  1. 1.Queensland University of TechnologyAustralia

Personalised recommendations