The Australian Educational Researcher

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 21–49 | Cite as

Defining educational research: A perspective of/on presidential addresses and the australian association for research in education

  • Bob Lingard
  • Trevor Gale
Article

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the definition of the field of educational research and the changing and developing role of the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) in representing and constituting this field. The evidence for the argument is derived from AARE Presidential Addresses across its 40-year history. The paper documents the enhanced complexity and diversity of the field over these 40 years, including the emergence of a global educational policy field, theoretical and methodological developments in the social sciences and new research accountabilities such as the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) measure. Specifically, the paper suggests that the evidence-based movement in public management and education policy, and the introduction of the ERA, potentially limit and redefine the field of educational research, reducing the usefulness and relevance of educational research to policy makers and practitioners. This arises from a failure to recognise thatEducation is both a field of research and a field of policy and practice. Located against both developments, the paper argues for a principled eclecticism framed by a reassessment of quality, which can be applied to the huge variety of methodologies, theories, epistemologies and topics legitimately utilised and addressed within the field of educational research. At the same time, the paper argues the need to globalise the educational research imagination and deparochialise educational research. This call is located within a broader argument suggesting the need for a new social imaginary (in a post-neoliberal context of the global financial crisis) to frame educational policy and practice and the contribution that educational theory and research might make to its constitution. In relation to this, the paper considers the difficulties that political representations of such a new imaginary might entail for the President and the Association, given the variety of its membership and huge diversity of its research interests.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anyon, J., with Dumas, M. J., Linville, D., Nolan, K., Perez, M., Tuck, E., & Weiss, J. (2009).Theory and educational research: Toward critical social explanation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Appadurai, A. (1996).Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  3. Appadurai, A. (2001). Grassroots globalization and the research imagination. In A. Appadurai (Ed.),Globalization (pp. 1–21). Durham, USA: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Appadurai, A. (2006).Fear of small numbers: An essay on the geography of anger. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Australian Research Council. (1992).Educational Research in Australia. Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
  6. Ball, S. J. (2006).Education Policy and Social Class. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Bartlett, L. (1989) New and old testaments of alliance in educational research: AARE Presidential Address. In T. Gale and B. Lingard (Eds.)Educational research by Association (pp. 59–79). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, U. (2000). The cosmopolitan perspective.British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 70–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernstein, B. (2001). From pedagogies to knowledge. In A. Marais, I. Neves, B. Davies, & H. Daniels (Eds.),Towards a sociology of pedagogy: The contribution of Basil Bernstein to research (pp. 363–368). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  10. Bessant, B., & Holbrook, A. (1995).Reflections on Educational Research in Australia. Melbourne: AARE.Google Scholar
  11. Blackmore, J. (2003). Tracking the nomadic life of the educational researcher: What future for feminist public intellectuals and the performative university?Australian Educational Researcher, 30(3), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blackmore, J. (2008). Anticipating policy and the logics of practice: Australian institutional and academic responses to the globalising “quality research” agenda.ACCESS, 27(1/2), 97–113.Google Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P. (1994).In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, P. (2008).Political interventions: Social science and political action. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  15. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1977).Reproduction in education, wociety and culture. Sage: London.Google Scholar
  16. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992).An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Campbell, A., & Groundwater-Smith, S. (Eds.). (2009).Connecting inquiry and professional learning in education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge and social science. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  19. Coryn, C. (2008.) The fundamental characteristics of international models and mechanisms for evaluating government-funded research.ACCESS, 27(1/2), 9–25.Google Scholar
  20. Figgis, J., Zubrick, A., Butorac, A., & Alderson, A. (2000). Backtracking practice and policies to research. In Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (Ed.),The Impact of Educational Research (pp. 279–373). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  21. Furlong, J., & Oancea, A. (2006). Assessing quality in applied and practice based educational research: A framework for discussion. In J. Blackmore, J. Wright, & V. Harwood (Eds.),Counterpoints on the quality and impact of educational research (pp. 89–104). Coldstream, Vic: AARE.Google Scholar
  22. Gale, T. (2006). Towards a theory and practice of policy engagement: Higher education research policy in the making.Australian Educational Researcher, 33(2), pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gale, T., & Lingard, B. (Eds.). (2009).Educational research by association: AARE presidential addresses and the field of educational research. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Gale, T., & Wright, J. (2008). Utility as a first principle for educational research: Reworking autonomy in Australian higher education.ACCESS, 27(1/2), 115–129.Google Scholar
  25. Griffiths, M. (1998).Educational research for social justice: Getting off the fence. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Head, B. (2008). Evidence-based policy: Three lenses.Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jennings, M. W. (Ed.).(1999).Walter Benjamin: Selected writings 1927–1934 (Vol 2.1 & 2.2). Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard.Google Scholar
  28. Lingard, B. (2001). Some lessons for educational researchers: Repositioning research in education and education in research.Australian Educational Researcher, 28(3), 1–46.Google Scholar
  29. Lingard, B. (2006). Globalisation, the research imagination and deparochialising the study of education.Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4(2), 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lingard, B. (2008). Globalising research accountabilities.ACCESS, 27(1/2), 175–188.Google Scholar
  31. Lingard, B., Ladwig, J., Mills, M., Bahr, M., Chant, D., Warry, M., et al. (2001).The Queensland School Reform Longitudinal Study. Brisbane: Education Queensland.Google Scholar
  32. Lingard, B., Nixon, J., & Ranson, S. (2008). Remaking education for a globalized world: Policy and pedagogic possibilities. In Lingard, B., Nixon, J., & Ranson, S. (Eds.),Transforming Learning in Schools and Communities (pp. 3–33). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  33. Lingard, B., Rawolle, S., & Taylor, S. (2005). Globalizing policy sociology in education: Working with Bourdieu.Journal of Education Policy, 20(6), 759–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lingard, B., & Renshaw, P. (2009). Teaching as a researched-informed and a researchinforming profession. In A. Campbell & S. Groundwater-Smith (Eds.),Connecting Inquiry and Professional Learning in Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Luke, A., & Hogan, D. (2006). Redesigning what counts as evidence in educational policy: The Singapore model. In J. Ozga, T. Seddon, & T. S. Popkewitz (Eds.),Education research and policy: Steering the knowledge based economy (pp. 170–184). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. McMeniman, M., Cumming, J., Wilson, J., Stephenson, J., & Sim, C. (2000). Teacher knowledge in action. In Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (Ed.),The impact of educational research (pp. 375–549). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  37. Moss, P., Phillips, D., Erickson, D., Floden, R., Lather, P., & Schneider, B. (2009). Learning from our differences: A dialogue across perspectives on quality in education research.Educational Researcher, 38(7), 501–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Munn, P. (2008). Building research capacity collaboratively: Can we take ownership of our future?British Educational Research Journal, 34(4), 413–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ozga, J. (2009). Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self-evaluation.Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ozga, J., & Lingard, B. (2007). Globalisation, education policy and politics. In B. Lingard and J. Ozga (Eds.),The RoutledgeFalmer reader in education policy and Politics (pp.65–82). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Ozga, J., Seddon, T. & Popkewitz, T. S. (Eds.) (2006).Education research and policy: Steering the knowledge based economy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Power, M. (1997). The audit society:Rituals of verification. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Power, M. (2004). Counting, control and calculation: Reflections on measuring and management.Human Relations, 57(6), 765–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rawolle, S., & Lingard, B. (2008). The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu and researching education policy.Journal of Education Policy, 23(6), 729–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010).Globalizing education policy. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Rudd, K. (2009). The global financial crisis.The Monthly, February, 20-29.Google Scholar
  47. Said, E. (1983).The world, the text and the critic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Said, E. (1993).Culture and Imperialism. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  49. Said, E. (2003/1978).Orientalism. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  50. Spivak, G. (1993).Outside in the teaching machine. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Thomson, P. (2006). Policy scholarship against depoliticisation. In J. Ozga, T. Seddon, & T. S. Popkewitz (Eds.),Education research and policy: Steering the knowledge based economy (pp. 316–331). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Thrift, N. (2005).Knowing Capitalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Trowler, P. (2003).Education Policy (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Tuhiwai Smith, L. (1999).Decolonizing methodologies, research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  55. Vertovec, S. (2009).Transnationalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Watson, L. (2008). Developing indicators for a new ERA: Should we measure the policy impact of education research?Australian Journal of Education, 52(2), 117–128.Google Scholar
  57. Weiss, C. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization.Public Administration Review, 39(5), 426–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Whitty, G. (2006). Education(al) research and education policy-making: Is conflict inevitable?British Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wiseman, A. W. (2010). The uses of evidence for educational policymaking: Global contexts and international trends. In A. Luke, J. Green, & G. J. Kelly (Eds.), What counts as evidence in educational settings? Rethinking equity, diversity, and reform in the 21stCentury. Review of Research in Education,34.Google Scholar
  60. Yates, L. (2004).What does good education research look like? Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Yates, L. (2008). Revisiting feminism and Australian education: Who speaks? What questions? What contexts? What impact?Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 29(4), 471–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Young, M. (1996).The curriculum of the future. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  63. Zizek, S. (2008).In defence of lost causes. New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Association for Research in Education 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bob Lingard
    • 1
  • Trevor Gale
    • 2
  1. 1.The University of QueenslandAustralia
  2. 2.University of South AustraliaAustralia

Personalised recommendations