The Australian Educational Researcher

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 15–35 | Cite as

“I am smart and I am not joking”: Aiming high in the middle years of schooling

  • Brenton Prosser
  • Faye McCallum
  • Philippa Milroy
  • Barbara Comber
  • Helen Nixon
Article

Abstract

In this paper, we draw on accounts from students to inform a Middle Schooling movement that has been variously described as “arrested”, “unfinished” and “exhausted”. We propose that if the Middle Schooling movement is to understand the changing worlds of students and develop new approaches in the middle years of schooling, then it is important to draw on the insights that individual students can provide by conducting research with “students-as-informants”. The early adolescent informants to this paper report high hopes for their futures (despite their lower socioeconomic surroundings), which reinforces the importance of supporting successful learner identities and highlights the role of schooling in the decline of adolescent student aspirations. However, their insights did not stop at the individual learner, with students also identifying cultural and structural constraints to reform. As such, we argue that students may be both an important resource for inquiry into individual school reform and for the Middle Schooling movement internationally.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, P. (2006). Positioning behaviour: Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the post-welfare era.International Journal of Inclusive Education, 10, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anafara, V. A., Jr. (Ed.). (2001).The handbook of research in middle level education. Greenwich, USA: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Arhar, J. M. (2005). Action research for middle level education professionals. In M. Caskey (Ed.),Making a difference: Action research in middle level education. Greenwich, USA: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2005).Schools Australia (Catalogue Number 4221.0). Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.Google Scholar
  5. Barratt, R. (1998).Shaping middle schooling in Australia: A report of the National Middle Schooling Project. Deakin West: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.Google Scholar
  6. Beane, J. (1991). The middle school: Natural home of integrated curriculum.Educational Leadership, 49(2), 9–13.Google Scholar
  7. Beane, J. A. (1995). Curriculum integrations and the disciplines of knowledge.Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 616–22.Google Scholar
  8. Beane, J. A. (1996). On the shoulders of giants! The case for curriculum integration.Middle School Journal, 28, 6–11.Google Scholar
  9. Beane, J. A. (2001). Introduction. In T. S. Dickinson (Ed.),Reinventing the middle school (pp. xiii-xxi). New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  10. Boomer, G., Lester, N., Onore, C., & Cook, J. (Eds.). (1992).Negotiating the curriculum: Educating for the 21st century. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1984).Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  12. Braggett, E. (1997).The middle years of schooling: An Australian perspective. NSW: Hawker Brownlow Education.Google Scholar
  13. Brennan, M., & Sachs, J. (1998).Integrated curriculum: Classroom materials or the middle years. Deakin West: Australian Curriculum Studies Association/National Schools Network.Google Scholar
  14. Carnegie Group. (1989).Turning points. Boston: Center for Collaborative Education.Google Scholar
  15. Carrington, V. (2006).Rethinking the middle years: Early adolescents, schooling and digital culture. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  16. Centre for Labour Research. (2002).Living and learning: A profile of young people, employment, education and training in northern Adelaide. Adelaide: University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
  17. Chadbourne, R. (2001).Middle schooling for the middle years: What might the jury be considering? Southbank: Australian Education Union.Google Scholar
  18. City of Playford. (2006).City of Playford wellbeing plan (2006–2011). Adelaide: City of Playford.Google Scholar
  19. Comber, B., & Kamler, B. (2005).Turn-around pedagogies: Literacy interventions for at-risk students. Newtown: Primary English Teaching Association.Google Scholar
  20. Comber, B., & Nixon, H. (2006, November).Teacher identity and pedagogical change. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Annual Conference, Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
  21. Cormack, P. (1996). Constructions of the adolescent in newspapers and policy documents: Implications for middle schooling.South Australian Educational Leader, 7(6), 1–12.Google Scholar
  22. Cormack, P. (1998). Classroom discourse in the upper primary and early secondary years.Queensland Journal of Educational Research, 15(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
  23. Cormack, P., Johnson, B., Peters, J., & Williams, D. (1998). About authentic assessment. In P. Cormack (Ed.),Authentic assessment: A report on classroom research and practice in the middle. Deakin West: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.Google Scholar
  24. Cuban, L. (1992). What happens to reforms that last? The case of the junior high school.American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 227–251.Google Scholar
  25. Cumming, J. (1996).Extending reform in the middle years of schooling: Challenges and responses. Deakin West: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.Google Scholar
  26. Daniels, H., Bizar, M., & Zemelman, S. (2001).Rethinking high school: Best practice in teaching, learning and leadership. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  27. Dimitriadias, G., & Weis, L. (2001). Imagining possibilities with and for contemporary youth: (Re)writing and (re)visioning education today.Qualitative Research, 1(2), 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dickinson, T. S. (2001).Reinventing the middle school. New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  29. Dolby, N. (2003). Popular culture and democratic practice.Harvard Educational Review, 73(3), 258–284.Google Scholar
  30. Duncan-Andrade, J. (2004). Your best friend or your worst enemy: Popular culture, pedagogy and curriculum in urban classrooms.Review of Education Pedagogy & Cultural Studies, 26(4), 313–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Earl, L. M. (1999).Education for the middle years: The paradox of hope. Jolimont. Vic: IARTV.Google Scholar
  32. Elliott, M., Sandeman, P., & Winchester, H. (2005, July).Embedding community engagement: Northern Adelaide and the University of South Australia. Paper presented at the 4th Australian University Quality Forum, Sydney.Google Scholar
  33. Eyers, V., Cormack, P., & Barratt, R. (1993).The education of young adolescents in South Australian government schools: Report of the Junior Secondary Review. Adelaide: Education Department of South Australia.Google Scholar
  34. George, P. S., Stevenson, C., Thomason, J., & Beane, J. (1992).The middle school — and beyond. Virginia USA: Association for Supervision of Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  35. Gonzalez, N., & Moll, L. (2002). Cruzando el Puente: Building bridges to funds of knowledge.Educational Policy, 16(4), 623–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goodson, I. (1995). The story so far: Personal knowledge and the political.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Green, B., & Bigum, C. (1993). Aliens in the classroom.Australian Journal of Education, 37, 119–141.Google Scholar
  38. Groundwater-Smith, S., Mitchell, J., & Mockler, N. (2007).Learning in the middle years: More than a transition. South Melbourne: Thomson.Google Scholar
  39. Grunewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place.Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Harradine, J. (1996). What research tells us about school reform.National Schools Network Newsletter, 2, 4–5.Google Scholar
  41. Hattam, R. (2006, November).Easier said than done: “Strong connectedness” in the middle years. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Annual Conference, Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
  42. Hattam, R., & Smyth, J. (2003). Not everyone has a perfect life: Becoming somebody without school.Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 11, 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hayes, D., Mills, M., Christie, P., & Lingard, B. (2006).Teachers & schooling making a difference: Productive pedagogies, assessment and performance. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  44. Hill, P. W., & Russell, V. J. (1999). Systemic whole school reform of the middle years of schooling. In R. Bosker, P. Creemers, & S. Stringfield (Eds.),Enhancing Educational Excellence, Equity and Efficiency (pp. 167–196). Dordrecht: Klewer Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. lisahunter. (2007). Editorial: Machination in the middle.Australian Educational Researcher, 34(2), 1–6.Google Scholar
  46. Jackson, A. W., & Davis, G. A. (2000).Turning points 2000: Educating adolescents in the 21st century. New York: Teachers’ College Press.Google Scholar
  47. Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2003). Planning pedagogy for i-mode: From flogging to blogging via wi-fi.English in Australia — Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 139, 78–102.Google Scholar
  48. Lamb, S., & Teese, R. (2006).Equity programs for government schools in NSW: A Review. Melbourne: Centre for Post-compulsory Education and Lifelong Learning, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  49. Lingard, B. (2006). Series editor’s foreword. In B. Lingard (Ed.),Rethinking the middle years: Early adolescents, schooling and digital culture. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  50. Lingard, B. (2007). Pedagogies of indifference.International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lingard, B., Ladwig, J., Luke, A., Mills, M., Hayes, D., & Gore, J. (2001).Queensland School Reform Longitudinal Study: Final report. Brisbane: Education Department.Google Scholar
  52. Lingard, B., & Mills, M. (2007). Pedagogies making a difference: Issues of social justice and inclusion.International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Luke, A., Elkins, J., Weir, K., Land, R., Carrington, V., Sole, S. et al. (2003).Beyond the middle: A report about literacy and numeracy development of target group students in the middle years of schooling. Nathan: Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training, Griffith University.Google Scholar
  54. Main, K., & Bryer, F. (2007). A framework for research into Australian middle school practice.Australian Educational Researcher, 34(2), 91–106.Google Scholar
  55. Marks, G. N., & Fleming N. (1999).Early school leaving in Australia: Findings from the 1995 Year 9 cohort. Camberwell, Vic: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  56. Megalogenis, G. (2006).The longest decade. Carlton North: Scribe Books.Google Scholar
  57. Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms.Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Office of Employment. (2003).Regional profile: Northern Adelaide statistical subdivision. Adelaide: Department of Further Education, Employment, Science and Technology.Google Scholar
  59. Peel, M. (1995). Good times, hard times: The past and the future in Elizabeth. Carlton: Melbourne Uni Press.Google Scholar
  60. Powell, R. (2001). Middle school curriculum. In Anafara, V. A., Jr. (Ed.),The handbook of research in middle level education (pp. 107–124). Greenwich, USA: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  61. Prosser, B. (2006).ADHD: Who’s failing who? Lane Cove: Finch.Google Scholar
  62. Prosser, B. (2008a). Beyond ADHD: A consideration of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and pedagogy in Australian schools.International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12 (1), 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Prosser, B. (2008b). Critical pedagogy and the mythopoetic: A case study from Adelaide’s northern urban fringe. In T. Leonard, & P. Willis (Eds.),Pedagogies of the Imagination. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  64. Reid, A. (2004).Toward a culture of inquiry in DECS. Occasional paper series, no. 1. Retrieved October 10, 2007, from the Government of South Australia Web site: http://www.decs.sa.gov.au/corporate/files/links/OP_01.pdfGoogle Scholar
  65. Roche, M. (1987). Social theory and the lifeworld.British Journal of Sociology, 38, 283–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sapon-Shevin, M. (2005). Afterword. In E. Brown, & K. Saltman (Eds.),The critical middle school reader (pp. 521–523). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Sellar, S., & Cormack, P. (2007, May).Redesigning pedagogies in the middle years: Challenges for teachers working with disadvantaged students. Paper presented at the Redesigning Pedagogy: Culture, Knowledge and Understanding Conference, Singapore.Google Scholar
  68. Slee, R. (1994). Finding a student voice in school reform: Student disaffection, pathologies of disruption and educational control.International Studies in the Sociology of Education, 4, 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Smith, G. (2002). Place-based education: Learning to be where we are.Phi Delta Kappan, 83(8), 584–594.Google Scholar
  70. Smyth, J. (2001).Critical politics of teachers’ work. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  71. Smyth, J., Dow, A., Hattam, R., Reid, A., & Shacklock, G. (2000).Teachers’ work in a globalizing economy. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  72. Smyth, J., & McInerney, P. (2007).Teachers in the middle: Reclaiming the wasteland of the adolescent years of schooling. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  73. Smyth, J., McInerney, P., & Hattam, R. (2003). Tackling school leaving at its source: A case of reform in the middle years of schooling.British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(2), 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stevens, L. P., lisahunter, Pendergast, D., Carrington, V., Bahr, N., Kapitzke, C., et al. (2007). Reconceptualizing the possible narratives of adolescence.Australian Educational Researcher, 34(2), 107–128.Google Scholar
  75. Teese, R. (2006, March 23). Learning labs.The Australian Financial Review.Google Scholar
  76. Thomson, P. (2002).Schooling the rustbelt kids: Making the difference in changing Times. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  77. Wallace, J., Sheffield, R., Rennie, L., & Venville, G. (2007). Looking back, looking forward: Re-searching the conditions for curriculum integration in the middle years of schooling.Australian Educational Researcher, 34(2), 29–49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Association for Research in Education 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brenton Prosser
    • 1
  • Faye McCallum
    • 1
  • Philippa Milroy
    • 1
  • Barbara Comber
    • 1
  • Helen Nixon
    • 1
  1. 1.Hawke Research Institute for Sustainable SocietiesUniversity of South AustraliaAustralia

Personalised recommendations