The Australian Educational Researcher

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 107–122 | Cite as

Corporal Punishment in the Schools of Ghana: Does Inclusive Education Suffer?

  • Joseph S Agbenyega
Article

Abstract

This paper reports on a study that compared the practice of corporal punishment in ten basic schools in the Greater Accra District in Ghana. Five of the ten schools were designated as inclusive project schools (IPS) and the other five as non-inclusive project schools (NIS). The primary purpose was to find out if the inclusive project schools were more effective in eradicating corporal punishment from their schools than were the non-project schools. One hundred teachers responded to a six-item questionnaire. A further 22 participants comprising ten teachers from the survey group, ten pupils and two directors of education were interviewed. Observation of the classroom practices, where these teachers work, substantiated the questionnaire and interview findings. The overall results indicated that corporal punishment still persists in both school sites at relatively the same scale. Three themes were found to underpin the administration of corporal punishment to students in these schools. (1) Punishment as an effective learning imperative (2) Punishment as a moral imperative (3) Punishment as religious imperative. The implications of these findings pertaining to inclusive education are discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avoke, M. (2002) Models of disability in the labelling and attitudinal discourse in Ghana,Disability and Society, vol. 17, no. 7, pp.769–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boakye, K. (2001) Reintroducing caning in our schools?,Ghanaian Chronicle, 3 April, p.1.Google Scholar
  3. Booth, T., M. Ainscow, K. Black-Hawkins, M. Vaughan and L. Shaw (2000)Index for Inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools, Centre for Studies in Inclusive Education, Centre for Educational Needs, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  4. Canter, L. (1989) Assertive discipline: more than names on the board and marbles in a jar,Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 71, pp.57–61.Google Scholar
  5. Canter, L. (2000) Assertive discipline, in C.H. Edwards, ed.,Classroom Discipline and Management, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, MA, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Cowne, E. (2003)Developing Inclusive Practice: The SENCO’s role in managing change, David Fulton, London.Google Scholar
  7. Deppeler, J.M. and D. Harvey (2004) Validating the British index for inclusion for the Australian context, Stage one,International Journal of Inclusive Education, vol. 8, no. 2, pp.155–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edumadze, E. (2004) Banning of corporal punishment has contributed to indiscipline,Ghana News Agency, 10 March, p.1.Google Scholar
  9. Ernest, P. (1995) The one and the many, in L. Steffe and J. Gale, eds.,Constructivism in Education, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  10. Ghana Education Service (2003)Increasing Access to Quality Basic Education for Children with Special Needs: Special Education Project with VSO, GES, Accra.Google Scholar
  11. Gibson, R. (1986)Critical Theory and Education, Hodder & Stoughton, London.Google Scholar
  12. Giroux, H. (1997)Pedagogy and the Politics of Hope: Theory, Culture and Schooling, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  13. Greydanus, D., H. Pratt, C.R. Spates, A. Blake-Dreher, M. Greydanus-Gearhart and D. Patel (2003) Corporal punishment in schools: An update of a position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine,Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 32, no. 5, pp.385–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gyekye, K. (2002)African Cultural Values: An introduction, Sankofa Publications, Accra.Google Scholar
  15. Hogan, K. and M. Pressley (1997)Scaffolding Student Learning: Instructional Approaches and Issues (Advances in Learning & Teaching), Brookline Books, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  16. Holy Bible: The New King James Version, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  17. Hooks, B. (1994)Teaching to Transgress: Education as a practice of freedom, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Hyman, R. and C. Rathbone (2004)Corporal Punishment in Schools: Reading the law, Retrieved 11 May 2004. http://www.educationlaw.org/publication/corporal.html.Google Scholar
  19. Kochanska, G. and R.A. Thompson (1997) The emergence and development of conscience in todlerhood and early childhood, in J. E. Grusec and L. Kuczynski, eds.,Parenting and Children’s Internationalisation of Values, pp.53–77, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Loreman, T., J. Deppeler and D. Harvey (2005)Inclusive Education: A practical guide to supporting diversity in the classroom, Allen & Unwin, NSW.Google Scholar
  21. Lupton, J. and G. Jones (2002)Practicing Inclusion: A self-review framework for inclusion and special education needs. A practical guide for schools, East Reading of Yorkshire Council Publications, London.Google Scholar
  22. Oliver-Commey, J.O. (2001)The Disabled Child in Ghana: Whose fault and who cares? Ghana University Press, Accra.Google Scholar
  23. Republic of Ghana (1992)Constitution of the Republic of Ghana, Assembly Press, Accra.Google Scholar
  24. Republic of Ghana (2004)The Development of Education National Report of Ghana: The basic education division of Ghana Education Service, Assembly Press, Accra.Google Scholar
  25. Richie, J. and L. Spencer (1994) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research, in A. Bryan and R. Burgess, eds.,Analysing Qualitative Data, pp.173–194, Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rogers, B. (1994)Classroom Discipline: A Planned Approach, Jefferson College Publishers, Washington.Google Scholar
  27. Rosen, L. (1997)School Discipline: Best Practices for Administrators, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
  28. Slee, R. (1995)Changing Theories and Practices of Discipline, Falmer Press, London.Google Scholar
  29. UNESCO (1994)World Conference on Special Needs Education: Access and Quality, UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  30. UNESCO (1996)Legislation Pertaining to Special Needs Education, Author, Paris.Google Scholar
  31. UNESCO (2001)Overcoming Exclusion through Inclusive Approaches in Education: A Challenge and Vision, Author, Paris.Google Scholar
  32. United Nations (1989)Convention on the Rights of the Child, United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
  33. United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (1998)Convention on the Rights of the Child, Retrieved October 2002. http://ohchr.org/english/law/crc/htm.Google Scholar
  34. von Glaserfeld, E. (1995a) A constructivist approach to teaching, in L. Steffe and J. Gale, eds.,Constructivism in Education, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., New Jersey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Association for Research in Education 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph S Agbenyega
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Ghana-LegonGhana

Personalised recommendations