Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Parents’ views of composite classes in an Australian primary school

Abstract

Parents of children in a large primary school in New South Wales were asked questions related to their attitudes towards and beliefs about composite (multigrade) classes. Parental concerns about composite classes are commonly reported as negative and this study confirmed this concern. Issues identified as causing concern for parents were a belief that some grades and some children are more suited than others to being part of a composite class, position in the class (younger or older grade), cohesion both within the class (class identity) and with grade peers in monograde classes (grade identity), perceived choice (between composite and monograde classes) and selection bias. Selection of particular teachers and students for the composite classes had both positive and negative effects — a positive effect on the composite class but a negative effect on the monograde classes because of the removal of the good role models and the ‘best’ teachers. Many parents reported more favourable attitudes after a positive experience with a composite class but not all such parents were prepared to indicate their support for composite classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. ASCD (Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development) (2005) The importance of schools in rural communities,Research Brief, vol. 3, no. 2, 18 January.www.ascd.org

  2. Brown, K. G. and A. B. Martin (1989) Student achievement in multigrade and single grade classes,Education Canada, vol. 29, no. 2, Summer, pp. 10–13, 47.

  3. Campbell, G. (1993) Assessing the impact of multigrade classes: An annotated bibliography,The Canadian Modern Language Review, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 345–364.

  4. Craig, C. and J. McLellan, (1987) Split grade classrooms: an educational dilemma,Education Canada, vol. 27, no. 4, Winter, pp. 4–9.

  5. Curriculum Directorate (1997) Multi-age classes in New South Wales, New South Wales Department of Education and Training, Sydney. Available online via www.schools.nsw.edu.au:80 [click on: Supporting Students, Programs and Services, Class Size Reduction Program, Multi Age Classes and Stage Based Learning, Multiage Classes in New South Wales (pdf 192 kb)]

  6. Dunn, M. A. (2000) Staying the course of open education,Educational Leadership, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 20–24.

  7. Forlin, P. R. and I. K. F. Birch (1995) Preparatory survey for drawing up a methodological guide to one teacher primary schools and multigrade classes: The Australian case study,Education Research and Perspectives, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 90–102.

  8. Gayfer, M., ed. (1991)The Multi-grade Classroom: Myth and Reality; A Canadian Study, Canadian Education Association, Toronto.

  9. Gomolchuk, S. L. and W. E. Piland (1995) Teacher attitudes toward multi-age classes,Education Canada, vol. 35, no. 4, Winter, pp. 28–32.

  10. Hohl, J. (1991) Multi-program classrooms in Quebec, Ch.3, pp.19–29, in M. Gayfer,The Multi-grade Classroom: Myth and Reality; A Canadian Study, Canadian Education Association, Toronto.

  11. Johnson, D. W., R. Johnson, W. T. Pierson, and V. Lyons (1985) Controversy versus concurrence seeking in multi-grade and single-grade learning groups,Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 835–848.

  12. Lloyd, L. (1997) Composite classes and teachers’ beliefs,Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 225–259.

  13. Lloyd, L. (1999) Multi-age classes and high ability students,Review of Educational Research, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 187–212.

  14. Mason, D. A. and R. B. Burns (1996) ‘Simply no worse and simply no better’ may simply be wrong: A critique of Veenman’s conclusion about multigrade classes,Review of Educational Research, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 307–322.

  15. Mason, D. A. and R. W. Doepner (1998) Principals’ views of combination classes,The Journal of Educational Research, vol. 91, no. 3, Jan/Feb, pp. 160–172.

  16. Mason, D. A. and T. L. Good (1996) Mathematics instruction in combination and single-grade classes: An exploratory investigation,Teachers College Record, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 236–265.

  17. Mason, D. A. and J. Stimson (1996) Combination and nongraded classes: Definitions and frequency in twelve states,The Elementary School Journal, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 439–452.

  18. Miller, B. (1994)Children at the Center: Implementing the multi-age classroom, Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, Portland, OR.

  19. Mulcahy, D. (1993) Developing a ‘distinctive approach’ for multi-grade classrooms; Some preliminary considerations,Education Canada, Spring, pp. 24-29.

  20. New South Wales Department of School Education (1989; update of Roseth, 1981)Evaluation Study of Composite Classes in Primary Schools, NSW DSE, Sydney.

  21. Pratt, C. and K. Treacy (1986) A study of student grouping practices in early childhood classes in Western Australian government primary schools,Co-operative Research Series No. 9, Education Department of Western Australia, Nedlands.

  22. Reed, S. E. and K. L. Westberg (2003) Implementing enrichment clusters in a multiage school: Perspectives from a principal and consultant,Gifted Child Today, vol. 26, no. 4, Fall, pp. 26–29.

  23. Roseth, N. (1981)Evaluation Study of Composite Classes in Primary Schools, New South Wales Department of Education, Sydney.

  24. Veenman, S. (1995) Cognitive and noncognitive effects of multigrade and multi-age classes: A best-evidence synthesis,Review of Educational Research, vol. 65, no.4, pp. 319–381.

  25. Veenman, S. (1996) Effects of multigrade and multi-age classes reconsidered,Review of Educational Research, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 323–340.

  26. Vincent, S., ed. (1999) The Multigrade Classroom; A Resource for Small, Rural Schools. Book 1:Review of the Research on Multigrade Instruction, Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, Portland, OR. Based on Miller, B. (1989) The Multigrade Classroom.

  27. Watson, A. J., R. D. Phillips, and C. Y. Wille (1995) What teachers believe about teaching composite classes,South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 133–164.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cornish, L. Parents’ views of composite classes in an Australian primary school. Aust. Educ. Res. 33, 123–142 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216837

Download citation

Keywords

  • Class Identity
  • Grade Identity
  • Composite Class
  • Rade Class
  • Lower Grade Student