The Australian Educational Researcher

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 19–44 | Cite as

Perceptions of the prevalence and seriousness of academic dishonesty in Australian universities

  • Mark Brimble
  • Peta Stevenson-Clarke


Academic dishonesty is a fundamental issue for the academic integrity of higher education institutions, and one that has lately been gaining increasing media attention. This study reports on a survey of 1206 students and 190 academic staff across four major Queensland universities in relation to student academic misconduct. The aim of the survey was to determine the prevalence of academic misconduct, and to investigate the extent to which perceptions of dishonesty are shared between students and staff, as preliminary steps toward developing effective strategies to deal with the academic dishonesty/misconduct problem. Results indicate a higher tolerance for academic misconduct by students in comparison to staff, particularly with respect to falsification of research results and plagiarism, as well as considerable underestimation by staff of the prevalence of virtually all forms of student academic misconduct. Overall, the study’s findings confirm the significance of the issue of academic dishonesty within the Australian tertiary sector, indicating considerable divergence between students and staff in terms of perceptions of the seriousness and prevalence of student academic misconduct. We suggest that university administrators need to examine this issue closely in order to develop mechanisms for managing and curtailing the level of academic misconduct, since a failure to do so may lead to a further undermining of the academic integrity of the Australian tertiary sector.


Academic Staff Business Student Academic Dishonesty Academic Integrity Cheat Behaviour 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bernardi, R., R. Metzger, R. Bruno, M. Hoogkamp, L. Reyes and G. Barnaby (2004) Examining the decision process of students’ cheating behaviour: an empirical study,Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 50, pp. 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolin, A. (2004) Self-control, perceived opportunity and attitudes as predictors of academic dishonesty,The Journal of Psychology, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowers, W. (1964)Student Dishonesty and Its Control in College, Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Cole, B. and D. Smith (1995) Effects of ethics instruction on the ethical perceptions of college business students,Journal of Education for Business, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 351–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crown, D. and M. Spiller (1998) Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: a review of empirical research,Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 17, pp. 683–700.Google Scholar
  6. David, F., L. Anderson and K. Lawrimore (1990) Perspectives on business ethics in management education,SAM Advanced Management Journal, vol. 9, pp. 26–32.Google Scholar
  7. de Lambert, K., N. Ellen and L. Taylor (2003) Prevalence of Academic Dishonesty in Tertiary Institutions: The New Zealand Story, Working Paper, Christchurch College of Education.Google Scholar
  8. Dick, M., J. Sheard and S. Markham (2001) Is it OK to cheat — the views of postgraduate students, Proceedings of the 6th Annual SIGCSE/SIGCUE Conference on Innovation and Technology, Canterbury, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Diekhoff, G., E. LaBeff, R. Clark, L. Williams, B. Francis and V. Haines (1996) College cheating: ten years later,Research in Higher Education, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 487–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ford, R. and W. Richardson (1994) Ethical decision making: a review of the empirical literature,Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 13, pp. 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Godfrey, J. and R. Waugh (1997) Students’ perceptions of cheating in Australian independent schools,Education Australia, vol. 37, pp. 14–16.Google Scholar
  12. Gottfredson, M. and T. Hirschi (1990)A General Theory of Crime, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  13. Grimes, P. (2004) Dishonesty in academics and business: a cross-cultural evaluation of student attitudes,Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 49, pp. 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haines, V., G. Kiefhoff, E. Labeff and R. Clark (1986) College cheating: immaturity, lack of commitment and the neutralising attitude,Research in Higher Education, vol. 25, pp. 342–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haswell, S., P. Jubb and B. Wearing (1999) Accounting Students and Cheating: A Comparative Study for Australia, South Africa and the UK,Teaching Business Ethics, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lawson, R. (2004) Is classroom cheating related to business students’ propensity to cheat in the ‘real world’?,Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 189–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lupton, R., K. Chapman and J. Weiss (2000) A cross-national exploration of business students’ attitudes, perceptions, and tendencies toward academic dishonesty,Journal of Education for Business, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 231–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McCabe, D. and W. Bowers (1994) Academic dishonesty among male college students: a thirty year perspective,Journal of College Student Development, vol. 35, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
  19. McCabe, D. and G. Pavela (2000) Some good news about academic integrity,Change, September/October, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCabe, D. and L. Trevino (1993) Academic dishonesty: honour codes and other contextual influences,The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 522–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCabe, D. and L. Trevino (1996) What we know about cheating in college,Change, January/February, pp. 29–33.Google Scholar
  22. Nonis, S. and C. Swift (2001) An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: a multicampus investigation,Journal of Education for Business, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nowell, C. and D. Laufer (1997) Undergraduate student cheating in the fields of business and economics,Journal of Economic Education, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
  24. Roberts, D. and R. Toombs (1993) A scale to assess perceptions of cheating in examination-related situations,Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 53, pp. 755–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roig, M. and C. Ballew (1994) Attitudes toward cheating of self and others by college students and professors,The Psychological Record, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
  26. Roth, N. and D. McCabe (1995) Communication strategies for addressing academic dishonesty,Journal of College Student Development, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 531–539.Google Scholar
  27. Salter, S., D. Guffey and J. McMillan (2001) Truth, consequences and culture: a comparative examination of cheating and attitudes about cheating among US and UK students,Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 31, pp. 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sauser, J. (1990) The ethics of teaching business: toward a model for business professors,SAM Advanced Management Journal, vol. 9, pp. 33–37.Google Scholar
  29. Sheard, J., M. Dick, S. Markham, I. Macdonald and M. Walsh (2002) Cheating and plagiarism: Perceptions and practices of first year IT students, Working Paper, Monash University.Google Scholar
  30. Stern, E. and L. Havlicek (1986) Academic misconduct: results of faculty and undergraduate student surveys,Journal of Applied Health, vol. 5, pp. 129–142.Google Scholar
  31. Storch, J., E. Storch and P. Clark (2002) Academic dishonesty and neutralisation theory: a comparison of intercollegiate athletes and nonathletes,Journal of College Student Development, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 921–930.Google Scholar
  32. Sykes, G. and D. Matza (1957) Techniques of neutralisation: a theory of delinquency,American Sociological Review, vol. 22, pp. 664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Von Dran, G., E. Callahan and H. Taylor (2001) Can students’ academic integrity be improved? Attitudes and behaviours before and after implementation of an academic integrity policy,Teaching Business Ethics, vol. 5, pp. 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. West, T., S. Ravenscroft and C. Schrader (2004) Cheating and moral judgement in the college classroom: a natural experiment,Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Association for Research in Education 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Brimble
    • 1
  • Peta Stevenson-Clarke
    • 1
  1. 1.Griffith UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations