The correlations between oxidative stress markers and indoor volatile organic compounds among the general population in Ansan and Incheon cities, Korea

  • Eunyoung Hong
  • Eunil Lee
  • Yanghee Kim
  • Eunha Oh
  • Young Whan Kim
  • Kyoung Whan Moon
  • Jae Wook Choi
  • Junghwa Lee
  • JooYoung Roh
Original Paper

Abstract

Indoor VOC and aldehydes may increase oxidative stress for home dwellers. Our study aim was to determine the correlations between oxidative stress markers in subjects and exposure to VOC and aldehydes in homes. Among ninety five control subjects in Ansan and Incheon (South Korea), blood samples were collected for evaluation of total antioxidant capacity, malondialdehyde (MDA) in plasma, protein carbonyl, and DNA damage of lymphocytes. Indoor VOC and aldehydes were measured in the homes of the subjects. A partial correlation analysis was performed to assess the association between oxidative stress markers and VOC/aldehydes with adjustment for formaldehyde levels. There were significant correlations between the total antioxidant capacity and some chemicals, including heptanes, α-pinene, β-pinene, and decanal in the young age (10–19 years) group. The many correlations between VOC/aldehydes and DNA damage expressed as the Olive tail moment showed statistically significant in the middle (20–39 years) and older age (40–59 years) groups, but not in the young age group. These correlation could not account for the exposure to specific chemicals being related to an increase in DNA damage because most VOC/aldehydes were highly correlate exac other except some chemicals. In conclusion, we found that DNA damage of T- and B-lymphocytes evaluated by the Comet assay could be sensitive oxidative stress markers to evaluate the human response to VOC/ aldehydes exposure in middle and older age groups. Our study also showed that age affected the association between VOC/aldehydes exposure and oxidative stress markers including DNA damage and antioxidants. However, further studies are needed to confirm these correlations in a larger number of subjects because of limitations of this study, including a lack of personal exposure.

Keywords

Indoor air pollution Organic compounds Formaldehyde DNA damage Comet assay Oxidative stress 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Suh, H. E., Bahadori, T., Vallarino, J. & Spengler, J. D. Criteria air pollutants and toxic air pollutants.Environ Health Perspect 108, 625–633 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sexton, K.et al. Comparison of personal, indoor, and outdoor exposures to hazardous air pollutants in three urban communities.Environ Sci Technol 38, 423–430 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wallace, L., Nelson, W. & Ziegenfus, R. The Los Angels TEAM study: Personal exposures, indoor-outdoor air concentrations, and breath concentrations of 25 volatile organic compounds.J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 1, 157–192 (1991).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ayoko, G. A. inThe Handbook of Environmental Chemistry Vol. 4 (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York, 2004).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wolkoff, P., Wilkins, C. K., Clausen, P. A. & Nielsen, G. D. Organic compounds in office environmentssensory irritation, odor, measurements and the role of reactive chemistry.Indoor Air 16, 7–19 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sunesson, A. L., Rosen, I., Stenberg, B. & Sjostrom, M. Multivariate evaluation of VOC in buildings where people with non-specific building-related symptoms perceive health problems and in buildings where they do not.Indoor Air 16, 383–391 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saijo, Y.et al. Symptoms of sick house syndrome and contributory factors: Study of general dwellings in Hokkaido.Nippon Koshu Eisei Zasshi 49, 1169–1183 (2002).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ando, M. Indoor air and human health-sick house syndrome and multiple chemical sensitivity.Kokuritsu Iyakuhin Shokuhin Eisei Kenkyusho Hokoku 120, 6–38 (2002).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koyasu, Y.et al. Epidemiologic study on the prevalence of the sick house syndrome in Japan.Arerugi 53, 484–493 (2004).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seki, A.et al. Review of sick house syndrome.Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi 62, 939–948 (2007).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kwon, K. D., Jo, W. K., Lim, H. J. & Jeong, W. S. Characterization of emissions composition for selected household products available in Korea.J Hazard Mater 148, 192–198 (2007).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Park, S., Kim, H., Sim, S. H., Lee, S. H. & Koo, J. W. Concentrations of VOC and formaldelhyde in newly constructed apartment buildings before and after residence.Kor J Env Hlth 33, 98–103 (2007).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brauer, C., Kolstad, H., Orbaek, P. & Mikkelsen, S. No consistent risk factor pattern for symptoms related to the sick building syndrome: A prospective population based study.Int Arch Occup Environ Health 79, 453–464 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Park, J. S. & Ikeda, K. Exposure to the mixtures of organic compounds in homes in Japan.Indoor Air 14, 413–420 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rumchev, K., Spickett, J., Bulsara, M., Phillips, M. & Stick, S. Association of domestic exposure to volatile organic compounds with asthma in young children.Thorax 59, 746–751 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mendell, M. J. Indoor residential chemical emissions as risk factors for respiratory and allergic effects in children: A review.Indoor Air 17, 259–277 (2007).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Garrett, M. H., Hooper, M. A., Hooper, B. M., Rayment, P. R. & Abramson, M. J. Increased risk of allergy in children due to formaldehyde exposure in homes.Allergy 54, 330–337 (1999).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Arif, A. A. & Shah, S. M. Association between personal exposure to volatile organic compounds and asthma among US adult population.Int Arch Occup Environ Health 80, 711–719 (2007).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wieslander, G., Norbäck, D., Björnsson, E., Janson, C. & Boman, G. Asthma and the indoor environment: the significance of emission of formaldehyde and volatile organic compounds from newly painted indoor surfaces.Int Arch Occup Environ Health 69, 115–124 (1997).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kelly, F. J. Oxidant stress; Its role in air pollution and adverse health effects.Occup Environ Med 60, 612–616 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lu, C. Y., Ma, Y. C., Lin, J. M., Chuang, C. Y. & Sung, F. C. Oxidative DNA damage estimated by urinary 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine and indoor air pollution among non-smoking office employees.Environ Res 103, 331–337 (2007).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gulec, M.et al. Antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation products in heart tissue of subacute and subchronic formaldehyde-exposed rats: A preliminary study.Toxicol Ind Health 22, 117–124 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mayne, S. T. Antioxidant nutrients and chronic disease: Use of biomarkers of exposure and oxidative stress status in epidemiologic research.J Nutr 133, 933S-940S (2003).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ghiselli, A., Serafini, M., Natella, F. & Scaccini, C. Total antioxidant capacity as a tool to assess redox status: critical view and experimental data.Free Radic Biol Med 29, 1106–1114 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Briggs, D. Environmental pollution and the global burden of disease.Br Med Bull 68, 1–24 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Georghiou, P. E., Snow, D. & Williams, D. T. Formaldehyde monitoring in urea-formaldehyde foam-insulated houses in St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada; Correlative field evaluation of a real-time infrared spectrophotometric method.Environ Int 9, 279–287 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Clarisse, B.et al. Indoor aldehydes: Measurement of contamination levels and identification of their determinants in Paris dwellings.Environ Res 92, 245–253 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Habif, S.et al. Age and gender dependent alterations in the activities of glutathione related enzymes in healthy subjects.Clinical Biochemistry 34, 667–671 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ashok, B. T. & Ali, R. The aging paradox: Free radical theory of aging.Exp Gerontol 34, 293–303 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yeh, C. C.et al. No effect of cigarette smoding dose on oxidized plasma proteins.Environ Res 106, 219–225 (2008).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mariani, E.et al. Antioxidant enzyme activities in healthy old subjects; Influence of age, gender and zinc status.Biogerontology 7, 391–398 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Barja, G. Rate of generation of oxidative stress-related damage and animal longevity.Free Radic Biol Med 33, 1167–1172 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ichiba, M.et al., Significance of urinary excretion of 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine in healthy subjects and liver disease patients.Hepato-Gastroenterology 54, 1736–1740 (2007).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mentese, S. & Güllü, G. Variations and sources of formaldehyde levels in residential indoor air in ankara, Turkey.Indoor Built Environment 15, 273–281 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moon, K. W.et al. Risk assessment of aldehydes in some residential indoor air included atopy patient’s homes.Kor J Env Hlth 32, 19–26 (2006).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sul, D.et al. Single strand DNA breaks in T- and Blymphocytes and granulocytes in workers exposed to benzene.Toxicology Letters 134, 87–95 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sul, D.et al. DNA damage in T- and B-lymphocytes and granulocytes in emission inspection and incineration workers exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.Mutat Res-Gen Tox En 538, 109–119 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Habdous, M.et al. Serum total antioxidant status, erythrocyte superoxide dismutase and whole-blood glutathione peroxidase activities in the Stanislas cohort: Influencing factors and reference intervals.Clin Chem Lab Med 41, 209–215 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bolzan, A. D., Bianchi, M. S. & Bianchi, N. O. Superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase activities in human blood: Influence of sex, age and cigarette smoking.Clin Biochem 30, 449–454 (1997).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ho, S. P., Chan-Yeung, M., Chow, K. K., Ip, M. S. & Mak, J. C. Antioxidant enzyme activities in healthy Chinese adults: Influence of age, gender and smoking.Respirology 10, 305–309 (2005).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rush, J. W. & Sandiford, S. D. Plasma glutathione peroxidase in healthy young adults: Influence of gender and physical activity.Clin Biochem 36, 345–351 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bates, C. J., Prentice, A. & Finch, S. Gender differences in food and nutrient intakes and status indices from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey of people aged 65 years and over.Eur J Clin Nutr 53, 694–699 (1999).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Picot, I. C., Trivier, J. M., Nicole, A., Sinet, P. M. & Thevenib, M. Age correlated modifications of copperzinc superoxide dismutade and glutathione related enzyme activities in human erythrocytes.Clin Chem 38, 1–66 (1992).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mendoza-Nunez, V. M., Ruiz-Ramos, M., Sanchez-Rodriguez, M. A., Retana-Ugalde, R. & Munoz-Sanchez, J. L. Aging-related oxidative stress in healthy humans.Tohoku J Exp Med 213, 261–268 (2007)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jones, D. P., Mody, V. C., Carlson, J. L., Lynn, M. J. & Sternberg, P. Redox analysis of human plasma allows separation of pro-oxidant events of aging grom decline in antioxidant defenses.Free radic Biol Med 33, 1290–1300 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1999b, Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in Air Collected in specially-prepared canisters and analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass spectrometry (GC /MS): Method TO-14: EPA-625/R-96-010b, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1999a, Determination of Formaldehyde in Ambient Air Using Absorbent Cartridge Followed by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) (active sampling method): Method TO-11: EPA-625/R-96-010b, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Singh, N. P., McCoy, M. T., Tice, R. R. & Scnider, E. L. A simple technique for quantification follow levels of DNA damage in individual cells.Exp Cell Res 175, 184–191 (1988).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Seljeskog, E., Hervig, T. & Mansoor, M. A. A novel HPLC method for the measurement of thiobabituric acid reactive substances (TBARS). A comparison with a commercially available kit.Clin Biochem 39, 947–954 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Fagan, J. M., Sleczka, B. Z. & Istvan, S. Quantitation of oxidative damage to tissue proteins.Int J Biochem Cell Biol 31, 751–757 (1999).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Environmental Risk Assessment and Health Science and Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eunyoung Hong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eunil Lee
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yanghee Kim
    • 1
    • 4
  • Eunha Oh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Young Whan Kim
    • 5
  • Kyoung Whan Moon
    • 5
  • Jae Wook Choi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Junghwa Lee
    • 6
  • JooYoung Roh
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of Preventive Medicine & Medical Research Center for Environmental Toxico-Genomics and ProteomicsKorea UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Graduate School of MedicineKorea UniversitySeoulKorea
  3. 3.Cellular and Developmental Biology, Division of Brain Korea 21 Program for Biomedical Science, Graduate SchoolKorea UniversitySeoulKorea
  4. 4.Department of Environmental Health Science, School of Public HealthKorea UniversitySeoulKorea
  5. 5.Department of Environmental Health Science, College of Health SciencesKorea UniversitySeoulKorea
  6. 6.Department of Pediatrics, College of MedicineKorea UniversitySeoulKorea
  7. 7.Department of DermatologyGachon Univeristy of Medicine, Gil Medical CenterIncheonKorea

Personalised recommendations