Gold Bulletin

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 109–119 | Cite as

The role of gold in alchemy. Part III

  • George B. Kauffman
Open Access
Article

Abstract

Through the centuries gold-making has been alternately encouraged and banned by rulers and clergy, and the number of alleged transmutations is considerable. Undoubtedly, deliberate fraud or deception was involved although often it cannot be proved from the historical accounts. With the advent of modern nuclear physics and chemistry the alchemist’s goal of transmutation has finally been realized, although the process is far from cost-effective.

References

  1. 155.
    Egyptian directions for preparing alloys resembling silver and gold are given in ref. 67aGoogle Scholar
  2. 156.
    G.M. Ross, ‘Leibniz’, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1984Google Scholar
  3. 157.
    J. Lenihan, ‘Science in Action’, The Institute of Physics, Bristol and London, 1979, pp. 179–180Google Scholar
  4. 158.
    E.R. Caley,J. Chem. Educ., 1926,3, 1149–1166; 1927,4, 979–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 159.
    J.R. Partington, ‘A Short History of Chemistry’, 3rd Ed., Harper & Brothers, New York, 1957, p, 17Google Scholar
  6. 160.
    A. de Rochas,Popular Science Monthly, 1980,36, (6), 814–820Google Scholar
  7. 161.
    É.-F. Geoffroy,Mém., Acad. Roy. Sci., Paris,1722, 61Google Scholar
  8. 162.
    J. van Lennep, ‘Art & Alchimie: Étude del’lconographieHermétique et de ses influences’, Éditions Meddens, Paris, Brussels, 1966Google Scholar
  9. 163.
    N. Lenglet Dufresnoy, ‘Histoire de la Philosophie Hermétique’, Constelier, Paris, 1742, Vol. 2, pp. 35–40Google Scholar
  10. 164.
    For example, the review,L’Initiation, founded in 1888 by the celebrated Parisian occultist Papus, is still published in Paris by his son Dr. Philippe Encausse. August Strindberg published a number of his ‘scientific’ works in this review. For a biography of Papus see P. Encausse, ‘Papus (Dr. Gérard Encausse): Le “Balzac de l’Occultisme”: Vingt-Cinq Années d’Occultisme Occidental’, Pierre Belfond, Paris, 1949Google Scholar
  11. 165.
    Paracelsus College, Utah Institute of Parachemistry, P.O. Box 6006, Salt Lake City, Utah 84106, ‘a non-profit educational institution formerly named Paracelsus Research Society, chartered by the State of Utah in 1963 and recognized by the Government of the United States of America’, carries out ‘research in laboratory alchemy and related subjects,…publishes a quarterly journal “Essentia” [and provides] two-week residential classes… with dormitory facilities provided for a nominal fee,… Tuition is free for those accepted’ (letter from Viola Engel to George B. Kauffman, May 15th, 1981). The recent death of Frater Albertus, the college’s founder and Prime Teacher, has caused an interruption in its activities.Google Scholar
  12. 166.
    H. Davy, ‘Elements of Chemical Philosophy’, J.Johnson & Co., London, 1812, Vol. 1, pp. 478–489Google Scholar
  13. 167.
    Anon. [W. Prout],Ann. Phil., 1815,6, 321–330; 1816,7, 111–113; reprinted in L. Dobbin and J. Kendall, ‘Prout’s Hypothesis’, Alembic Club Reprint No, 20, Edinburgh, 1932 and in D.M. Knight (Editor), ‘Classical Scientific Papers — Chemistry, Second Series’, American Elsevier Publishing Co., New York, 1970, pp. 17–29. See also O.T. Benfey,J. Chem. Educ., 1952,29, 78–81; W.H. Brock,Medical History, 1965,9, 101–106;Ann. Sci., 1969,25, 49–80, 127–137; D.F. Larder,Centaurus, 1970,15, 44–50Google Scholar
  14. 168.
    W. Crookes,J. Chem. Soc., 1883,53, 487–504;Reports of the British Association, 1886, pp. 558–576; ‘Genesis of the Elements: A Lecture delivered at the Royal Institution, on Friday Evening, February 18, 1887’, [n.p.] London, 1887;Chem. News, 1889,60, 27–30, 39–41; 51–53; 63–66Google Scholar
  15. 169.
    W.V. Farrar,Brit. J. Hist. Sci., 1965,2, 297–323; D.M. Knight, ‘The Transcendental Part of Chemistry’, Dawson Publishing Co., Folkestone, Kent, England, 1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 170.
    F. Jollivet-Castelot, ‘La vic et l’âme de la matière: Essai de physiologie chimique; Études de dynamochimie’, Société d’Éditions scientifiques, Paris, 1894; ‘La révolution chimique et la transmutation des métaux’, Chacornac, Paris, 1925; ‘Études d’hyperchimie, chimie et alchimie’, Émile Noury, Paris, 1928; ‘La fabrication chimique de l’or: procédés Jollivet-Castelot’, Douai, 1928Google Scholar
  17. 171.
    R.F. Trimble,J. Chem. Educ., 1980,57, 645–646;The Hexagon, 1981,71, (3), 41–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 172.
    R. Schwabele,L’Echo de Mines et de la Métallurgie, 1904, 1341Google Scholar
  19. 173.
    A. Mercier,Rev. litt. comparée, 1969,43, 23–46Google Scholar
  20. 174.
    A. Cockren,Occult Rev., 1942,69, (2), 61–62, 65;Light, 1942,62, (3213), 257–258Google Scholar
  21. 175.
    C.R. Cammell, ‘Heart of Scotland’, Robert Hale, London, 1956Google Scholar
  22. 176.
    Fulcanelli, ‘Le mystère des Cathédrales et l’Interprétation Esotérique des Symboles Hermétiques du Grand-Oeuvre’, J. Schemit, Paris, 1926; ‘The Mystery of the Cathedrals: Esoteric Interpretation of the Hermetic Symbols of the Great Work’, transl. from the French by M. Sworder with prefaces by E. Canseliet, introd. by W. Lang, Neville Spearman, London, 1971. See also Fulcanelli, ‘Les Demeures philosophales et le symbolisme hermétique dans ses rapports avec l’Art sacré et l’ésotérisme du Grand Oeuvre’, J. Schemit, Paris, 1930Google Scholar
  23. 177.
    E. Rutherford, ‘The Newer Alchemy: The Transmutation of Elements’, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1937Google Scholar
  24. 178.
    T.J. Trenn, ‘Transmutation: Natural and Artificial’, Heyden & Son, London, Philadelphia, Rheine, 1981Google Scholar
  25. 179.
    A. Romer (Editor), ‘The Discovery of Radioactivity and Transmutation’, Dover Publications, New York, 1964Google Scholar
  26. 180.
    H. Becquerel,Compt. rend., 1896,122, 420–421, 501–503, 689–694, 1086–1088Google Scholar
  27. 181.
    J.J. Thomson,Electrician, 1897,39, 104–108;Proc. Roy. Inst.,1897, 418–432;Phil. Mag., 1897,44, 293Google Scholar
  28. 182 (a).
    E. Rutherford and F. SoddyJ. Chem. Soc., 1902,81, 321–350, 837–860;Phil. Mag., 1902, [6]4, 584–585; 1903, [6]5, 576–591;Google Scholar
  29. 182 (b).
    W. Ramsay and F. Soddy,Nature, 1903,68, 246. These articles are reprinted in ref. 179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 183.
    T.J. Trenn, ‘The Self-Splitting Atom: The History of the Rutherford-Soddy Collaboration’, Taylor & Francis, London, 1977Google Scholar
  31. 184.
    E. Rutherford,Phil. Mag., 1919,37, 537, 562, 571, 581;Proc. Roy. Soc., 1920, 97A, 374–400; T.J. Trenn,Ambix, 1974,21, 53–77Google Scholar
  32. 185.
    F. Joliot and I. Curie,Compt. rend., 1934,198, 254–256;J. Phys. Radium, 1934,5, 153–156Google Scholar
  33. 186.
    E. Fermi, E. Amaldi, O. D’Agostino, F. Rasetti and E. Segrè,Proc. Roy. Soc., 1934,A146, 483–500Google Scholar
  34. 187.
    J. Chadwick,Proc. Roy. Soc., 1932,A136, 692–708; 1933,A142, 1–25; H.A. Shadduck,J. Chem. Educ., 1936,13, 303–308Google Scholar
  35. 188.
    O. Hahn and F. Strassmann.Naturwiss., 1939,27, 451–453; O. Hahn,Scientific American, 1958,198, 76–84; H.G. Graetzer and D.L. Anderson, ‘The Discovery of Nuclear Fission’, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 189.
    H.D. Smyth, ‘A General Account of the Development of Methods of Using Atomic Energy for Military Purposes under the Auspices of the United States Government 1940–45’, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1945; F. Soddy, ‘The Story of Atomic Energy’, New Atlantis, London, 1949Google Scholar
  37. 190.
    G.T. Seaborg, ‘The Transuranium Elements’, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, 1958; ‘Man-made Transuranium Elements’, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963; ‘Transuranium Elements: Products of Modern Alchemy’, Dowden, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, 1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 191.
    D.S. Greenberg,Omni Jan., 1981,3, (4), 52–54, 109; R.B. McColm,Omni, Jan., 1981,3, (4), 46–51, 86–88; T. Kidder,Science 82, Mar., 1982, No. 2, 54–64; R.W. Conn,Scientific American, Oct., 1983,249, (4), 60–71; D.E. Thomsen,Science News, 1984,125, (1), 10–11; J.L. Bromberg, ‘Fusion: Science, Politics and the Invention of a New Energy Source’, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1982Google Scholar
  39. 192.
    A. Gaschler.Z angew. Chem., 1924,37, 666–667; A. Miethe,Naturwiss., 1924,12, 597–598; 1925,13, 635–637; A. Miethe and H. Stammreich,Naturwiss., 1924,12, 1211–1212; Zanorg. Chem., 1926,158, 185–243; H. Stammreich,Naturwiss., 1924,13, 744–745; H. Nagaoka,Naturwiss., 1925,13, 682–684;J Phys. Rad., 1924, [5]6, 209–216;Nature, 1925,116, 95–96; see also F. Soddy,Nature, 1924,114, 244–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 193.
    O. Hönigschmid and E. Zintl,Naturwiss., 1925,13, 644;Z. anorg. Chem., 1925,147, 262–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 194.
    F.W. Aston,Nature, 1925,116, 208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 195 (a).
    E. Tiede, A. Schleede and F. Goldschmidt,Naturwiss., 1925,13, 745–746;Ber., 1926,59, 1629–1641;or]195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 195 (b).
    Anon.,Scientific American, 1925,33, 296–298;Google Scholar
  44. 195 (c).
    H.H. Sheldon and R.S. Estey,Ind. Eng. Chem., News Ed., 1926,4, (23), 5–7;Google Scholar
  45. 195 (d).
    M.W. Garret,Nature, 1926,118, 84;Proc. Roy. Soc., 1926,A112, 391–406;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 195 (e).
    E. Paternò,Atti Accad. Lincei, 1926, [6]4, 541–544;Gazz. chim. ital., 1926, 57, 25–28;Google Scholar
  47. 195 (f).
    F. Bernardt,Phys. Z., 1926,27, 713–715;Google Scholar
  48. 195 (g).
    E. Duhme and A. Lotz,Ber., 1926,59, 1649–1651;Z. anorg. Chem., 1927,161, 180–182;Google Scholar
  49. 195 (h).
    E.H. Riesenfeld and W. Haase,Naturwiss., 1925,13, 745; 1925,58, 2828–2834;Ber., 1926,59, 1625–1629;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 195 (i).
    W. Machu,Österr. Chem. Ztg., 1938,41, 376–381Google Scholar
  51. 196.
    F. Haber, J. Jaenicke and F. Matthias,Ber, 1926,59, 1641–1648; Z.anorg. Chem., 1926,153, 153–183Google Scholar
  52. 197.
    R. Sherr, K.T. Bainbridge and H.H. Anderson,Phys. Rev., 1941,60, 473–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 198.
    P. Bendix,LBL Magazine, Fall, 1980, 29–30; K. Aleklett, D.J. Morrissey, G.T, Seaborg and W. Loveland, ‘Production of Gold Isotopes by Relativistic Heavy Ion Reactions with Bismuth’, paper presented before the Division of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, 179th National Meeting, American Chemical Society, Houston, Texas, 1980, 24th March; K. Aleklett. D.J. Morrissey, W. Loveland, P.J. McGaughey and G.T. Seaborg,Phys. Rev. C., 1981,23, 1044–1046Google Scholar
  54. 199.
    F. Soddy, ‘The Evolution of Matter’,Aberdeen University Review, Feb., 1917, reprinted in ‘Science and Life: Aberdeen Addresses’, E.P. Dutton & Co., New York, 1920, p. 107Google Scholar

Copyright information

© World Gold Council 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • George B. Kauffman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryCalifornia State UniversityFresnoUSA

Personalised recommendations