Advertisement

Journal of Applied Genetics

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 177–184 | Cite as

Darwin’s contributions to genetics

  • Y. -S. Liu
  • X. M. Zhou
  • M. X. Zhi
  • X. J. Li
  • Q. L. Wang
Review Article

Abstract

Darwin’s contributions to evolutionary biology are well known, but his contributions to genetics are much less known. His main contribution was the collection of a tremendous amount of genetic data, and an attempt to provide a theoretical framework for its interpretation. Darwin clearly described almost all genetic phenomena of fundamental importance, such as prepotency (Mendelian inheritance), bud variation (mutation), heterosis, reversion (atavism), graft hybridization (Michurinian inheritance), sex-limited inheritance, the direct action of the male element on the female (xenia and telegony), the effect of use and disuse, the inheritance of acquired characters (Lamarckian inheritance), and many other observations pertaining to variation, heredity and development. To explain all these observations, Darwin formulated a developmental theory of heredity — Pangenesis — which not only greatly influenced many subsequent theories, but also is supported by recent evidence.

Keywords

Darwin genetics Pangenesis variation and heredity breeding 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin CR, Bishop MWH, 1959. Presence of spermatozoa in the uterine-tube mucosa of bats. J Endocrinol 18: R7-R8.Google Scholar
  2. Bartley MM, 1992. Darwin and domestication: studies on inheritance. J Hist Biol 25: 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateson W, 1906. The progress of genetic research. In: Scientific papers of William Bateson (edited by Punnett, R. C.), 1928, 2: 142–151.Google Scholar
  4. Bateson W, 1910. Heredity and variation in modern lights. In: Darwin and modern science. Cambridge University Press: 84–101.Google Scholar
  5. Beardmore JA, Lints FA, Al-Baldawi ALF, 1975. Parental age and heritability of sternopleural chaeta number inDrosophila melanogaster. Heredity 34: 71–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Belyaev DK, Ruvinsky AO, Borodin PM, 1981. Inheritance of alternative states of the fused gene in mice. J Hered 72: 107–112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bulant C, Gallais A, 1998. Xenia effects in maize with normal endosperm: I. Importance and stability. Crop Sci 38: 1517–1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bunting J, 1974. Charles Darwin. Bailey Brothers & Swinfen LTD: 114.Google Scholar
  9. Burbank L, 1927. The harvest of the years. Boston & New York: Hoghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  10. Cox CF, 1909. Charles Darwin and the mutation theory. Am Nat 43: 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Darwin C, 1872. On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life, 6th ed. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  12. Darwin C, 1868. The variation of animals and plants under domestication. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  13. Darwin C, 1987. Charles Darwin’s notebook, 1836–1844. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Davenport CB, 1933. An alleged case of inheritance of acquired characters. Am Nat 67: 549–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Denney JO, 1992. Xenia includes metaxenia. Hort Science 27: 722–728.Google Scholar
  16. de Vries, 1910. Intracellular Pangenesis. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Co. (translated from the German by C. Stuart Gager): 7.Google Scholar
  17. de Vries, 1911. The mutation theory. London: KeganGoogle Scholar
  18. Paul and Co. Duc G, Moessner A, Moussy F, Mousset-Declas C, 2001. A xenia effect on number and volume of cotyledon cells and on seed weight in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) Euphytica 117: 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunn LC, 1973. Xenia and the origin of genetics. Proc Am Philos Soc 117: 105–111.Google Scholar
  20. Endersby J, 2003. Darwin on generation, pangenesis and sexual selection. In: Hodge J, Radick G, eds. The Cambridge companion to Darwin. Cambridge University Press, 69–91.Google Scholar
  21. Engel ML, Chaboud A, Dumas C, MCormick S, 2003. Sperm cells ofZea mays have a complex complement of mRNAs. Plant J 34: 697–707.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Frankel R, 1956. Graft-induced transmission to progeny of cytoplasmic male sterility inPetunia. Science 124: 684–685.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Galton F, 1871. Experiments in Pangenesis, by breeding from rabbits of a pure variety, into whose circulation blood taken from other varieties had previously been largely transfused. Proc R Soc Lond 19: 393–410.Google Scholar
  24. Ghiselin MT, 1975. The rationale of Pangenesis, Genetics 79: 47–57.Google Scholar
  25. Gorcynski RM, Kennedy M, Macrae S, Ciampi A, 1983. A possible maternal effect in the abnormal hyporesponsiveness to specific alloantigens in offspring born to neonatally tolerant fathers. J Immunol 131: 1115–1120.Google Scholar
  26. Hall BK, 1995. Atavisms and atavistic mutations. Nat Genet 10: 126–127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hammond J, 1958. Darwin and animal breeding. In: Barnet A, ed. A Century of Darwin. London: Heinemann: 85–101.Google Scholar
  28. Hui L, 1989. Why does my newborn daughter resemble my former husband?Family (9): 1.Google Scholar
  29. Landman OE, 1991. The inheritance of acquired characteristics. Annu Rev Genet 25: 1–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu YS, 2005. Reversion: going back to Darwin’s works. Trends Plant Sci 10: 459–460.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu YS, 2006. The historical and modern genetics of plant graft hybridization. Adv Genet 56: 101–129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu YS, 2007. Like father like son: a fresh review of the inheritance of acquired characters. EMBO Rep 8: 798–803.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu YS, 2008a. A new perspective on Darwin’s Pangenesis. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 83: 141–149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu YS, 2008b. A novel mechanism for xenia?HortScience 43: 706.Google Scholar
  35. Lizana GB, Prado JAS, 1994. Effects of parents’ age on the level of polymorphism at the Adh locus inDrosophila melanogaster: I. Effects on the genic and genotypic segregation of the offspring. J Hered 85: 327–331.Google Scholar
  36. Lolle SJ, Victor JL, Young JM, Pruitt RE, 2005. Genome-wide non-Mendelian inheritance of extra-genomic in formation inArabidopsis. Nature 434: 505–509.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lucas WJ, Yoo B-C, Kragler F, 2001. RNA as a long-distance information macromolecule in plants. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2: 849–857.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Mayr E, 1991. One long argument: Charles Darwin and the genesis of modern evolutionary thought. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Mei D, 2000. The son who resembles his mother’s former husband. Healthy Life 11: 37.Google Scholar
  40. Michurin IV, 1949. Selected Works. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
  41. Mole, 2006. How we know I: strange dreams. J Cell Sci 119: 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moore JA, 1963. Heredity and development. New York: Oxford University Press: 1–14.Google Scholar
  43. Muntzing A, 1959. Darwin’s views on variation under domestication in the light of present-day knowledge. Proc Am Philos Soc 103: 190–220.Google Scholar
  44. Ohta Y, 1991. Graft-transformation, the mechanism for graft-induced genetic changes in higher plants. Euphytica 55: 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pahlavani, MH, Abolhasani K, 2006. Xenia effect on seed and embryo size in cotton. J Appl Genet 47: 331–335.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sopikov PM, 1954. Changes in heredity by the parenteral administration of blood. Agrobiologiia 6: 34–45.Google Scholar
  47. Steele EJ, Lindley RA, Blanden RV, 1998. Lamarck’s signature: how retrogenes are changing Darwin’s natural selection paradigm. Massachusetts: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
  48. Stegemann S, Bock R, 2009. Exchange of genetic material between cells in plant tissue grafts. Science 324: 649–651.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Stroun M, Anker P, 2005. Circulating DNA in higher organisms cancer detection brings back to life an ignored phenomenon. Cell Mol Biol 51: 767–774.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Sturtevant AH, 1965. A history of genetics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  51. Taller J, Yagishita N, Hirata Y, 1999. Graft-induced variants as a source of novel characteristics in the breeding of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Euphytica 108: 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tchang TR, Shi XB, Pang YB, 1964. An induced monster ciliate transmitted through three hundred and more generations. Sci Sin 13: 850–853.Google Scholar
  53. Wallace HM, Lee LS, 1999. Pollen source, fruit set and xenia in mandarins. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 74: 82–86.Google Scholar
  54. Weismann A, 1904. The evolution theory. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  55. Winther RG, 2000. Darwin on variation and heredity. J Hist Biol 33: 425–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. -S. Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • X. M. Zhou
    • 1
  • M. X. Zhi
    • 1
  • X. J. Li
    • 1
  • Q. L. Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Henan Institute of Science and TechnologyXinxiangChina
  2. 2.Department of BiochemistryUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations