Journal of Applied Genetics

, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 105–107 | Cite as

High-quality plant DNA extraction for PCR: an easy approach

  • I. Ahmed
  • M. Islam
  • W. Arshad
  • A. Mannan
  • W. Ahmad
  • B. Mirza
Short Communication

Abstract

Polymerase chain reaction has found wide applications in modern research involving transformations and other genomic studies. For reproducible PCR results, however, the quantity and quality of template DNA is of considerable importance. A simple and efficient plant DNA extraction procedure for isolation of high-quality DNA from plant tissues is presented here. It requires maceration of plant tissue of about 1.0 cm2 (e.g. of a leaf blade) in DNA extraction buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM EDTA, 250 mM NaCl) using 1.5-mL microfuge tubes, followed by cell lysis with 20% SDS, and DNA extraction with phenol: chloroform: iso-amyl alcohol (25:24:1). Hydrated ether is then used to remove polysaccharides and other contaminants from the DNA preparation. Average DNA yield is 20–30 μg cm−2 for fresh tissues, and ratio of absorbance at 260 nm to absorbance at 280 nm is 1.5–1.8. The DNA is quite suitable for PCR using microsatellites, RAPD and specific markers for recombinant selection. Amplifications have been obtained for these markers by using template DNA extracted from fresh as well as frozen leaf tissues of various plants, including barley, oat, potato and tomato. DNA stored for more than 2 years has been successfully amplified with microsatellite markers, which shows suitability of this method after long-term storage of DNA. Besides, the ease of use and cost-effectiveness make the procedure attractive.

Keywords

DNA extraction hydrated ether microsatellites phenol chloroform isoamyl alcohol plant tissues polysaccharides 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cheng YJ, Guo WW, Yi HL, Pang XM, Deng X, 2003. An efficient protocol for genomic DNA extraction from citrus species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 21: 177a-177g.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL, 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19: 11–15.Google Scholar
  3. Fang G, Hammar S, Grumet RA, 1992. A quick and inexpensive method for removing polysaccharides from plant genomic DNA. Biofeedback 13: 52–54.Google Scholar
  4. Hill-Ambroz KL, Brown-Guedira GL, Fellers JP, 2002. Modified rapid DNA extraction protocol for high throughput microsatellite analysis in wheat. Crop Sci 42: 2088–2091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Huang X, Zeller FJ, Hsam SLK, Wenzel G, Mohler V, 2000. Chromosomal location of AFLP markers in common wheat, utilizing nulli-tetrasomic stocks. Genome 43: 298–305.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Jobes D V, Hurley DL, Thien LB, 1995. Plant DNA isolation: a method to efficiently remove polyphenolics, polysaccharides, and RNA. Taxon 44: 379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kang TJ, Yang MS, 2004. Rapid and reliable extraction of genomic DNA from various wild-type and transgenic plants. BMC Biotechnol. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-4-20.Google Scholar
  8. Lodhi MA, Ye GN, Weeden NF, Reisch BI, 1994. A simple and efficient method for DNA extractions from grapevine cultivars andVitis species andAmpelopsis. Plant Mol Biol Rep 12: 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mogg RJ, Bond JM, 2003. A cheap, reliable and rapid method of extracting high-quality DNA from plants. Mol Ecol Note 3: 666–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Porebski S, Bailey LG, Baum BR, 1997. Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant Mol Biol Rep 15: 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schlink K, Reski R, 2002. Preparing high-quality DNA from moss (Physcomitrella patens). Plant Mol Biol Rep 20: 423a-423f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sharma AD, Gill PK, Singh P, 2002. DNA isolation from dry and fresh samples of polysaccharide-rich plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep 20: 415a-415f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Ahmed
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Islam
    • 1
    • 3
  • W. Arshad
    • 1
  • A. Mannan
    • 1
  • W. Ahmad
    • 1
  • B. Mirza
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiochemistryQuaid-i-Azam University IslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and EvolutionMassey UniversityPalmerston NorthNew Zealand
  3. 3.Department of GeneticsHazara UniversityMansehraPakistan

Personalised recommendations